Final
Vote Totals – Raytown Sales Use Tax
YES 1023 votes 53.59%
NO 886
votes 46.41%
Some interesting statistics:
Area
wide voter turnout: 11.6%
Cost
per ballot cast: $15.31
Today
is Election Day
Voters will decide the fate of a new
2.5% Sales Use Tax. This Band-Aid approach of slowly ratcheting up the cost of
living with a new sales tax is deeply flawed.
Pro tax forces have run a campaign of
misinformation to persuade voters to buy into this unfair and regressive tax
increase.
They speak in general terms
of improving streets, sewers, and city services.
Yet they refuse to ear-mark the money for
specific projects.
The reality is if this tax is
passed, the money will go directly to the general fund where it can be used on
anything they wish.
VOTE NO Sales Use Tax
Special Election
Tuesday, November 2, 2021
Reprinted FROM THE Kansas City Star OCTOBER 29, 2021
 |
| BY GREG WALTERS |
Greg Walters is serving in his 30th year as a member of the Raytown Board of Aldermen. He has published the Raytown Report news/blog since 1997. The Raytown Report can be accessed at www.raytownreport.blogspot.com
Raytown Voters do not need to hand
over a blank check in Sales Use Taxes
On Tuesday Raytown voters will decide the fate of a new 2.5% Sales Use Tax. This Band-Aid approach of slowly ratcheting up the cost of living with a new sales tax is deeply flawed.
Pro tax forces have run a campaign of misinformation to persuade voters to buy into this unfair and regressive tax increase.
They complain inflation is costing the city tax dollars, particularly in franchise tax fees.
That is nonsense.
Franchise taxes in Raytown are paid for by homeowners and businesses when they pay utility bills. These taxes are assessed on how much you pay for electricity, natural gas, telephone service (cell and landline), and cable services.
Franchise taxes are tied directly to inflation. If the cost of your service goes up, so does the franchise tax you pay.
All sales taxes are tied directly to inflation as well. For instance, the more you spend on groceries, the more the city makes.
The pro tax people claim the city has had declining revenues.
That is simply not true.
In fact, in 2019/2020 (at the beginning of the Covid-19 Pandemic) the city actually had a banner year. Sales tax revenues have remained robust into 2021. Because of inflation, city tax revenues will continue to rise.
Real estate and personal property tax revenue is on the rise as well. Want proof? Check out the increase of what homes are selling for in the Raytown area. There is a housing shortage. Demand has driven prices up. Higher values means more real estate tax revenue for the city.
Another falsehood being spread by the pro-tax people is that this new Sales Use Tax is a tax on internet retailers.
That is extremely misleading.
If this Sales Use Tax passes purchases from out of state internet sellers would be charged an additional 2.5%. The vendor does not pay the tax.
As with all sales taxes, the vendor acts as an agent for the taxing entity. The retailer remits the sales tax collected to the State of Missouri. The state redistributes the tax collected to local governing entities.
An interesting fact about the Sales Use Tax is that less than half the cities in the State of Missouri collect it.
There is also a question of what is fair and equitable for Raytown taxpayers.
The Use Tax is a regressive tax.
It hurts those most who have the least. It is a financial drain on low and fixed income households as compared to those with higher incomes.
A seatmate of mine on the Raytown Board of Aldermen, Derek Ward, has suggested the city should look at Municipal Bonds.
A Better Way.
Municipal Bonds would raise more money, more quickly, than levying a Sales Use Tax on Raytowners.
Best of all, it would jump start long overdue improvements to city streets, particularly in our neighborhoods.
What Raytown really needs is more accountability from its elected leaders.
The proposed 2.5% Sales Use Tax provides none.
All the money collected under the proposed Sales Use Tax will go into the general fund. No earmarks for improving our city’s infrastructure. No money set aside for improvements to neighborhoods.
A Municipal Bond is different because the money from bonds can only be spent on what the voters are promised.
Such bonds are valuable because they are enforced by Bond Covenants that are iron clad.
If voters approve the Sales Use Tax there is no guarantee where the money will be spent.
Therefore, no accountability.
It would be accurate to say you are writing a blank check to City Hall. Those blank checks to City Hall have not worked in the past.
Those blank checks will not work now.
VOTE NO Sales Use Tax
Special Election
Tuesday, November 2, 2021
Better yet, Vote No and remind your neighbors, friends and family to do the same.
PAID FOR BY GREG WALTERS
USE THIS LINK TO . . . Comment
About a week ago we received the following comment on the
blog portion of the Raytown Report. We thought the subject merited more comment
than just two sentences.
ANONYMOUS WROTE . . .
How do you figure they're
sneaking in an election? It's everywhere on social media that the election is
coming up!
 |
| BY ALDERMAN GREG WALTERS |
OUR REPLY . . . The
decision to hold a stand-alone election on November 2, 2021 is a costly one.
The Jackson County Election Board estimates Raytown cost for this election to
come to approximately $40,200.
Had the
Board changed the date of the election to April of 2022, the city would realize
a savings of at least $20,000!
To
understand why there is such a difference in cost is easily explained. The
State of Missouri has set aside the first Tuesday in April as the time for
local governmental bodies to hold their elections.
An example
of what this election should cost can be found in 2019. The 19 governmental
bodies listed below held City Elections in April of 2019. Because all of the
elections were held at the same time, the cost of the election was shared.
City of Blue Springs, City of Grain Valley, City of Grandview, City of Lake
Lotawana, City of Oak Grove, City of Raytown, Town of River Bend, Town of
Sibley, Town of Unity Village, Blue Springs R4 School District, Fort Osage R1
School District, Grain Valley R5 School District, Grandview C4 School District,
Hickman Mills C1-School District, Lee’s Summit R-7 School District, Oak Grove
R6 School District, Raytown C2 School District, Lotawana Fire Protection
District, Raytown Fire Protection District.
According to
the Jackson County Election Board, this “Special Election” will cost the City
of Raytown approximately $40,200. By comparison Raytown’s “share” of the April,
2019 election came to $20,640.
OUR VIEW . . .
This is
not the first time the City held a special election to push a tax through. In
August of 2018 the City of Raytown placed three tax increase questions on the ballot.
The voters in Raytown turned down all three of the tax increase questions.
Two of
those tax increase questions lost by landslide margins of 70% NO to 30% YES. The third tax was a gasoline tax, lost by a smaller margin.
As in
2018, the tax increase in 2021 is being held as a “special election”.
This is
not a coincidence or accident. These elections are scheduled purposely for a “low
turn-out” event. The reason is simple, historically speaking, tax increase questions have a better chance of passing in a low turnout election.
The Mayor
has been known to brag about his political base on Facebook. He and his
supporters plan is simple. Keep the election low profile and hope his base will
follow his instructions and vote for a 2.5% Sales Use Tax.
THE 2.5% SALES USE TAX IS FLAWED
Here’s a
little secret the “more taxes crowd” will not share with you. The tax revenue a
2.5% Sales Tax is not dedicated to any particular service. Ward 5 Alderman
Derek Ward attempted to have the money earmarked for street maintenance. However
the Mayor and the majority of the Board were clearly opposed to a tax dedicated
to street maintenance.
The 2.5% Sales Use Tax is a
regressive tax. The
burden of paying for it hits hardest on those who can least afford it. Those on
fixed incomes will especially feel the burden of this new tax.
City Hall
is not starved for money. But it is lacking accountability. The following list
is of questionable expenditures enacted since 2019.
$40,000 – spent on an electronic
billboard in front of city hall on one of the least travelled streets in
Raytown. The sign only faces one way, north towards Raytown Road. Is very
difficult to read, and does not even face two of the three directions. Which
means if you are travelling on 59th Street, you cannot see what
is on the sign.
$20,000 – approved in the 2021/2022 City
Budget for replacing a sign located on the City Hall Parking lot that points
the direction to the Raytown Police Department. Industry professionals place
the cost of replacement at no more than $2,500.
$40,000 – spent on this upcoming election
when it could be held for as little $20,000 if held in April, 2022. The savings
would be even greater if held during a regular election cycle when the city regularly municipal elections.
$5,000 – estimated cost of the City printing
and mailing a “5 Facts to Know” and “Use Tax FAQ’s” to “educate” the voters of
Raytown.
The
disclaimer on the Flyer read: “For informational purposes only. Paid for by the
City of Raytown, Michael McDonough Mayor.
Do the math . . . that is just four examples. The
total comes to $105,000.00! Raytown needs more accountability and some common
sense at City Hall. The city does not need to burden taxpayers with an unfair and
regressive Sales Use Tax.
That $105,000 would more than pay
for another policeman, or, do some serious repair work to our neighborhood
streets.
VOTE NO Sales Use Tax
Special Election
Tuesday, November 2, 2021
GUEST EDITORIAL BY WARD 5 ALDERMAN DEREK WARD
A Better
Way
alderman_derek_ward@raytown.mo.us
In several
conversations with constituents and Raytown residents over the last several
weeks, two points were universally agreed.
First, our roads are in deplorable condition and fixing them is the top
priority. Second, sales taxes are
regressive (they hurt the poor far more than the wealthy).
It is
clear to anyone who drives in Raytown that although Raytown Road and State Route
350 are in decent shapes, the roads that lead past our homes are crumbling. In
the 16 years I’ve lived in Raytown, I don’t recall the city conducting any
maintenance on our neighborhood streets. But I’m one of the lucky residents; my
street is only starting to fail. Many of
my 5th Ward constituents are not so lucky.
Below are
two pictures showing just one (but representative of many) road very near my
home.
Although I
am not a civil engineer or a road expert, I’m fairly certain that once the road
surface has a consistency of sand and grass is growing through the pavement, the
road needs to be completely replaced.
Our
current band-aid approaches are not working.
To be
clear, this is not a criticism of our wonderful city staff. They do the best
they can with what they are given. And pointing fingers won’t solve the
problem. Only a pro-active approach and a commitment to continuous improvement
will get us where we need to go.
I voted
against the effort to place the use-tax question on the ballot for two
reasons. First, as noted above, I
believe that sales and use taxes punish our poorest for simply living. With year over year inflation currently
exceeding 5%, adding another 2-3% in taxes seems like a sure way to stress
already strained household budgets. Most
families have not seen their wages go up 7-8% in the last year (or even the
last three years combined).
Second,
and perhaps equally importantly, I believe that the only realistic way Raytown
has to pay for the roughly $50 million dollars we need in street repairs to
issue bonds.
Interest
rates are at historic lows and there may never be a better time to borrow.
Yes, this
will lead to a tax increase. But it will be tied to the ownership or real
property that will increase in value when the roads are fixed or that will
decrease in value if they are not fixed.
Make no
mistake, if we don’t fix the roads, your home will be worth less. Whatever we
can spend today will save us money in the long term while preserving or even
increasing today’s property values.
As always,
I am always happy to talk with Raytown residents and Ward 5 constituents. If you have any questions, please feel free
to reach out to me.
Raytown Democrat Association turns back
request for endorsement of 2.5% Sales Use Tax
The
Raytown Democrat Association (RDA) met last week for a two hour meeting. About
30 people were on hand to discuss a number of topics. Those topics included a
lively discussion on Covid-19 Mask Restrictions and the need for more Jackson
County residents to get vaccinated.
Guest
speakers included Ward 3 Alderman Ryan Myers and Ward 1 Alderman Greg Walters.
Myers and Walters held a short debate on the upcoming 2.5% Sales Use Tax to be
voted on November 2nd by Raytown Voters.
Myers
spoke in favor of the tax. Walters spoke in opposition. In his presentation Myers
asked the RDA to endorse the tax. However, none of the members present made a
formal motion to make an endorsement, so the question was not voted.
Also in
attendance were Jackson County Legislators Jalen Andersen and Tony Miller.
Andersen and Miller spoke on many topics. The discussion included plans for a
new Jackson County Jail, Covid-19, legislative redistricting, and next year’s
elections (August and November, 2022 elections).
The
next meeting of the RDA will be held on November 18, 2021. The monthly meetings
are held at Las Chili’s Restaurant located at 6210 Raytown Trafficway. Meetings
formally begin at 7:00 p.m. However many members arrive for a social hour at the
restaurant beginning at 6:00 p.m.
USE THIS LINK TO . . . Comment
 |
| BY TRUTH WATCH |
Truth Watch Returns!
We contacted a friend of ours who used to write a column for the Raytown Report that he called “Truth Watch”. He shared his thoughts about the upcoming Special Election. We found it enlightening. We hope you do too.
SALES USE TAX “Fun Facts” AND A PINOCCHIO
COUNT*
*A pinocchio is a term used by Washington Post Fact Checker Glenn
Kessler. It is a scale to determine the truth in a given statement. He grades
lies from "one pinocchio" (some shading of the facts and selective
telling of the truth), to "five
pinocchios" (whoppers).
This past week Raytowners were treated to an infomercial of sorts
via the United States mail. Taxpayers found a flier entitled “Facts to Know and
Use Tax FAQ’s” about the upcoming November 2nd Special Election.
Voters will decide the fate of a 2.5% Sales Use Tax on that day. The following list of "fun facts" should help clarify any questions people have about the the 2.5% Sales Use Tax.
FUN FACT 1: According to the flyer, the City can expect to gain
$200,000 annually from a Sales Use Tax. This is odd. When the issue first came
forward, the city placed the amount of money it would collect at $400,000. Just a personal observation, but those folks at City Hall need to get their story straight.
FUN FACT 2: Supporters of the new tax have made some claims that are simply not true. My favorite is "This is not a new tax." Untwist the words and you come up with a different statement that is factual.
Raytowners are not currently paying the tax. If the tax passes they will pay 2.5% on every internet purchase they make they currently do not pay. Sounds like a new tax to me.
FUN FACT 3: In the flyer it is clearly stated that nearly half of
Missouri cities have a Sales Use Tax. Doesn’t that mean that more than half do NOT
have a Use Tax? I am not sure what the pro side is trying to say here. Their logic went right past me.
FUN FACT 4: The pro tax people at city hall want people to believe
this is not a sales tax. Plainly speaking, that is not a true statement. The
tax is calculated and charged at a percentage of 2.5% on the value of the goods
being purchased.
That is the definition of a sales tax. You can call it a different name. But it is still a tax based on the amount of the sale. If the tax passes 2.5% will be added to every purchase you make on the internet.
Make no mistake about it. The Sales Use Tax is a Sales Tax.
It is a new tax you do not currently pay. But you most certainly will pay it if
this tax passes on November 2nd.
My grade on the Fact Sheet from City Hall?
THREE PINOCCHIOS (Significant factual errors and/or contradictions)
REMEMBER TO VOTE NO SALES USE TAX
Election Day, Tuesday, November 2, 2021
USE THIS LINK TO . . . Comment
EUPHEMISM: a word or phrase used in place of
a term that might be considered too direct, harsh, unpleasant, or offensive
EXAMPLES OF A EUPHEMISM
“Sales Use
Tax” instead of “Sales Tax”
“Concentration
Camp instead of “Death Camp”
 |
| BY GREG WALTERS |
Sales Taxes are regressive. They benefit the rich. explained . . .
Imagine two individuals each purchase $100 of
clothing per week, and they each pay $7 in tax on their retail purchases.
The first individual earns $2,000 per week, making the sales tax rate on her purchase 0.35 percent of her income.
In contrast, the other individual earns $320 per week, making her clothing
sales tax 2.2 percent of her income.
Although the percentage of the tax is the same
rate in both cases, the person with the lower
income pays a higher percentage of her personal income.
The person making the higher income pays a lower percentage of her personal income.
Make no mistake about it. The 2.5% Sales Use Tax is a regressive sales tax. It that hurts people
on limited incomes the most.
On November 2nd, join your neighbors
in voting NO on this regressive and unfair tax.
USE THIS LINK TO . . . Comment
Doughboys . . . is
Back in Business! BY GREG WALTERS
We like
to check back on some of our “Upcoming Events” stories to see how things panned
out for the owners. Last Monday and Tuesday Doughboys Donuts re-opened their
doors for business after being closed for nearly two months.
Marjain
Breitenbach told us they actually had two openings this week. The first opening
was a “soft” opening (Monday) was done to make sure everything was still in
working order after a two month hiatus.
The
only items not working properly were the telephone and credit card machine.
Elisa Breitenbach said that despite those two bumps in the road, everything
went swimmingly!
The “grand re-opening” went very well. Marjain
said, “we surpassed our regularly opening crowd by over 30%. Given that we were
closed for nearly two months, we are pleased with the results,” continued
Marjain.
“People were coming into the store doing “happy
dances”, said Elisa. “It was like a party atmosphere.
The
Breitenbachs told us, “We love our customers and from our point of view, they
showed they care as well, by voting with their feet and showing up after our
being closed for two months.”
This
story truly has a Happy Ending.
Paul's Rant! BY PAUL LIVIUS
THIS WEEK: Recent
Tax Increases and Future Tax Increases
Those who are pounding the drum for a 2.5% Sales (use) Tax are not
alone in their effort to raise taxes. The City of Raytown, the Raytown School
District and the State of Missouri have quietly put into motion changes in
fees, tax increase and planned tax increase elections within the near future.
In fact, some of these "new" taxes have already been
established.
MISSOURI GASOLINE TAX: Missouri
voters have defeated attempts by the State of Missouri to increase the tax on
gasoline in the state. What our State Government could not accomplish at the
ballot box they legislated into a recent increase on the tax we all pay
for gasoline in Missouri.
You may have noticed this recent increase of 2.5 cents per gallon. Coupled
with inflationary pressures and changes in how gasoline is provided to the
public by Washington, DC, has increased the price of gasoline to the $3.00 per
gallon level.
LICENSE FEES: The City of Raytown recently increased the fees it charges
utilities and property owners for inspection and license fees of street cuts and construction in the city right of way. License fees are charged by municipalities on utility companies when public streets are cut for repair of utilities that frequently run under the street.
These increases have been noticed by utility companies. Mr. Pat
Ertz, President of the Raytown Public Water Supply District No. 2, asked the
Board Aldermen to reconsider reducing some of the fee increases that ranged from 66% to 900%.
Mr. Ertz told City Officials the fee increases would ultimately be
passed down to everyone who purchases water from Water Supply District Number
2. The same would be true for fees paid by Evergy (electricity), Spire (natural
gas), and Raytown Water Company*.
Those fee increases would ultimately be paid for by utility users.
Despite his warning, the Board of Aldermen approved ALL of the
rate increases.
These fees will affect what we pay for electricity, natural gas,
water, cable service, literally any utility that cuts into a street or right of
way in Raytown. The cost will be passed down to us when we pay our utility
bills.
In a classic case of cause and effect, the city will then tax us
more for the total amount we pay the utility companies!
*Raytown is served by two water companies.
RAYTOWN SCHOOL DISTRICT: The
Raytown School District is considering another property tax increase for voters
to vote on in April of 2022. Look for property taxes to be increased or
extended as a result of a school bond election if voters approve the proposal.
INFLATION: If approved by the
voters the Sales (use) Tax will be applied to all internet purchases in
Raytown. If you purchase food, medicine, vitamins, literally anything you would
purchase in a retail grocery store in Raytown. You will be charged the 2.5%
sales use tax by the City of Raytown.
As with all sales taxes, the city’s “take” on the sales tax is tied
to inflation. So as your dollar’s purchasing power becomes less, the city
actually receives more.
NEXT WEEK:
“Sales taxes are regressive and benefit the wealthy” . . . explained.
