BY GREG WALTERS |
Publisher's Desk . . .
This week we are presenting the results of an opinion poll we published two weeks ago. The opinion poll is the brainchild of Ward 5 Alderman Derek Ward.
Mr. Ward to us, “My
intent was to create an accurate poll to gauge the needs and desires of
the people of Raytown.”
In our view, Alderman
Ward has succeeded. He has taken into account all of the needs of Raytown. Not just that of one department. The answers from the public tell the rest of the story.
The Board of Aldermen should use this valuable tool as they work together to guide Raytown to a better future.
We thank Mr. Ward for his service to the community and his willingness to think outside the box to bring focus to the needs of community.
SPECIAL THANKS: Special thanks to Raytown’s “Wizard of the Web”, Richard Tush. The Raytown Report does not have the software to convert the graphics in Alderman Ward’s story. Mr. Tush came to the rescue and changed over the graphics for us. Looks 500% better than what we started with. Some may recognize the name Richard Tush. He serves as one of the three Executive Directors of the Raytown Fire Protection District.
The Board of Aldermen should use this valuable tool as they work together to guide Raytown to a better future.
We thank Mr. Ward for his service to the community and his willingness to think outside the box to bring focus to the needs of community.
SPECIAL THANKS: Special thanks to Raytown’s “Wizard of the Web”, Richard Tush. The Raytown Report does not have the software to convert the graphics in Alderman Ward’s story. Mr. Tush came to the rescue and changed over the graphics for us. Looks 500% better than what we started with. Some may recognize the name Richard Tush. He serves as one of the three Executive Directors of the Raytown Fire Protection District.
Alderman Derek Ward’s Survey Results
BY WARD
5 ALDERMAN DEREK WARD
Over the last year, I
have consistently and publicly stated that my immediate priorities for Raytown
are roads and police. While our city has
many pressing challenges, I believe none are more important than taking
immediate action on fixing our crumbling physical infrastructure and ensuring
that we have a properly staffed and enthusiastic police department. And while I am very supportive of a strong
and thriving parks system, I cannot support additional taxes for parks before
we design and implement a solution addressing roads and police.
Last year, the city
hired a consultant to evaluate the present (first half of 2018) road
conditions. The report indicated that as
of the report date, our roads required roughly $36 million dollars in
repairs. The consultant advised that if
immediately began spending about $3 million per year, we could improve our
average road from a score of 46 (out of 100) to a score of 55 (out of 100) over
10years. Obviously, an average score of
55 is still quite poor. Most
importantly, every year we spend less than that, our roads will get worse and
the cost to repair will increase, rapidly.
Very rapidly. If we can’t afford
$36 million today, what chance do we have to afford $100 million ten years from
now?
Against that
backdrop, the advisory Raytown Parks Board of Directors wishes to double the
amount of taxes every shopper pays towards the parks system. It is my opinion, shared by a majority of
other alderman (based upon past votes), that it is not appropriate to raise
taxes to build new, expensive park facilities, when (1) we are not maintaining
our existing park facilities despite having nearly $1 million in the parks bank
account, (2) we are facing upwards of $50 million in present street and sewer
needs, and (3) our police department is not properly staffed.
During various
presentations to the Board of Aldermen over the last 12 months, Park staff have
repeatedly referred to a survey they conducted.
According to the testimony of Park’s staff, the survey shows strong
support for various park projects.
However, according to the same testimony, the survey did not ask
respondents to rank or compare their interest in the various park proposals
against other City needs.
In other words, the
Park’s survey did not ask whether the person believed it was more important to
build a new splash pad or fix the roads that a resident would drive on to get
to the splash pad. Accordingly, to help
fill in that gap, I created a very simple survey last week. The link to the surveywas provided to
multiple news and blog sites and was posted by a group member to an active
Facebook page dedicated to Raytown. The
survey was available for approximately five days. Below are the results and a few summary
comments.
Total
Number of Responses: 81
Percentage
living in Raytown: 93%
Average
number of years in Raytown: 20
Drilling into the details, only 15% of people ranked Parks as #1, compared to 43% ranking Parks as #5 (lowest priority).
Drilling into the details, only 15% of people ranked Parks as #1, compared to 43% ranking Parks as #5 (lowest priority).
As a comparison, here are the details on Roads and Police.
Looking at these last three graphs, it appears that an overwhelming number of people chose Parks as the least important, where very few chose streets as least important and virtually no one chose police as least important.
To be clear, this
doesn’t mean that people don’t believe our parks aren’t important. At all.
It simply means that among competing priorities, our park system is less important than roads and police.
I, and others, have
frequently criticized our Park Board leadership for failing to maintain
existing park facilities, while both (a) sitting on a mountain of money nearly
equal to $1 million dollars, and (b) asking to increase taxes to building new
facilities. For example, most of the
tennis courts at the parks south of 350 highway are either unplayable or nearly
unplayable. The Parks Board could easily
repair these courts and still have a budget reserve larger than most cities.
One of the survey questions asks whether the Parks department should focus more on maintaining existing park facilities or building new amenities. By a wide margin, 83% of people said parks should focus on maintaining existing facilities.
Finally, my survey asked people to make a very simply “A vs B ” choice. Specifically, the question asked whether the city should focus on basic and essential services, such as roads, or should instead focus on park amenities and facilities. Nearly 72% of people chose basic and essential city services.
One of the survey questions asks whether the Parks department should focus more on maintaining existing park facilities or building new amenities. By a wide margin, 83% of people said parks should focus on maintaining existing facilities.
Finally, my survey asked people to make a very simply “A vs B ” choice. Specifically, the question asked whether the city should focus on basic and essential services, such as roads, or should instead focus on park amenities and facilities. Nearly 72% of people chose basic and essential city services.
I’m sure that some people will criticize my poll and my conclusions. They will point out that polling is difficult, that I’m not a professional poll maker and that I have a bias. All of those facts may be true. But that doesn’t change the following:
·
The
Parks survey did not ask to directly rank Park Amenities vs. Good Roads,
Properly Staffed Police or any other competing need.
·
The
Parks survey showed that less than half of respondents (45%) were satisfied
with Raytown Parks. Nothing in the
survey indicates or proves that more money spent on parks is necessary to
improve satisfaction.
·
The
survey was conducted in 2015, focuses heavily on Super Splash and assumes the
presence of a local YMCA. Raytown in
2019 is a very different city in important respects than it was in 2015.
But most importantly,
even the Parks paid-for survey barely has the proposed ½ cent tax passing. Maybe.
Only 38% of people said that they would definitely vote for the tax
increase. Combined with the 13% that
said they “might vote in favor” means that at best, in 2015, the measure may
have passed with 51% of the vote. Or
failed with 38% of the vote.
I remain committed to
supporting our Parks Department, while remaining firmly resolved to immediately
addressing our current road and police needs as the highest priorities. Accordingly, if presented with the opportunity,
I will vote to renew the existing tax, but I will not vote to double it.
For more information
the survey results, please visit https://bit.ly/2IP0O9T
for the summary or https://bit.ly/2PCFXHj
for the full results.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
Loretha
Hayden told the Board the aldermen need to work together to build up Raytown,
not tear it down. They should be willing
to represent the people who voted for them.
If not, they should reconsider their positions. Also, the Park Board is attempting to
complete some of the project the residents indicated they wanted when they
returned the survey. The current tax is
sunsetting in 2020. The citizens have
told the Park Board they want a dog park, splash pad, and redevelop the Super
Splash property, but these can’t be done without more money.
The
Board heard the first reading of an ordinance declaring a nine-month moratorium
on the acceptance, processing and issuance of business license applications,
building permits, occupancy permits, package liquor licenses and development
approval applications for liquor stores, smoke shops, and convenience stores
and similar uses within neighborhood commercial zoned districts within the city
of Raytown.
For the
past year, numerous Raytown citizens have contacted City Staff and several
Aldermen expressing concerns regarding the number of liquor stores, smoke
shops, and convenience stores opening in Neighborhood Commercial Districts
throughout Raytown. An analysis of the City's current zoning and licensing
regulations, the City's economic development plan and goals, and other
pertinent information, especially national, regional, and local economic
trends, is required to reach an informed decision as to the propriety and
direction of resolving the apparent conflict between the stated intent of the
Neighborhood Commercial District and the aforementioned uses.
As a result,
the Municipal Committee instructed staff to come up with some recommendations.
The Assistant City Administrator
suggested imposing a nine (9) month moratorium on processing
applications for these businesses so that the ordinances, including the zoning
and licensing ordinances, can be evaluated and if necessary amended. The
proposed delay would take effect upon passage of the resolution and last until
new ordinances are approved or until January 31, 2020, whichever occurs sooner.
The
moratorium would not impact the processing of business license renewal
applications for these types of businesses, filed after the approval date of
the ordinance. Staff would also process any renewal applications for package
liquor licenses for these types of businesses, if filed after the approval date
of the ordinance, but the businesses must maintain a valid Raytown business
license and be issued a renewal package liquor license from the State of
Missouri. Should a business with a package liquor license need to change
ownership of the business and keep the business in the same location within
Neighborhood Commercial Districts, staff would process the new package liquor license.
The
Board approved a resolution authorizing the continuation of an agreement with
Mize Houser & Company for the performance of professional audit services
and the expenditure of funds in an amount not to exceed $22,890. The fiscal audit was completed and presented
in April 2019 and services are completed as requested.
The
Board approved a resolution authorizing the city administrator to enter into an
agreement with Sak Construction for the infiltration & inflow reduction
& rehabilitation project, east sewer basin in a total amount not to exceed
$177,969.
The
Public Works Department received two (2) sealed bids that were opened on
Tuesday, August 14 at 2:00 p.m. A third company decided not to turn in a bid.
SAK Construction, LLC is the lowest, responsive, responsible bidder with a
total bid of $161,790.00 and is being recommended for approval. This East Basin
Sanitary Sewer Shed has been investigated with our flow meters in multiple
locations to try to pinpoint areas with the most inflow and infiltration. This
project is designed to tighten up the sanitary sewer system to try to keep more
rain water & groundwater out of the sewers.
This
project includes doing point repairs, repairs to private sewer line connections
at the sewer main and installing cured-in-place pipe to seal long runs of sewer
main. The base bid was in the amount of $161,790.00. Staff is requesting
purchasing authority up to $177,969.00 to accommodate for potential change
orders. This is an additional 10% of the total bid cost. Construction
inspection services will be performed with City staff. The Sewer Fund has
$240,000.00 budgeted for sewer rehabilitation in Capital Expenditures.
The
Board approved a resolution authorizing the professional services of Leath
& Sons for emergency sanitary sewer repairs at 10200 E. 85th Terrace in an
amount not to exceed $15,080. On Monday,
April 1, 2019, the sanitary sewer crew was called out to a sewer backup in the
10200 block of E. 85th Terrace. Upon arrival, the crew discovered there was a
backup within the City main line, and after a considerable amount of time we
were unable to free the clog and open the City main line.
Ace
Pipe Cleaning, Inc. was called and helped us clear the line. During post backup
investigation, our CCTV crew discovered some heavily cracked and collapsing
pipe along with tree roots. Staff reviewed the CCTV work and found 3 segments
of clay pipe that needed to be immediately replaced to prevent further backups
(about 10’ of pipe to replace that we can readily identify). Due to the condition
of the pipe, we are unable at this time to determine if additional may be
required to be replaced, until this project is underway.
Staff
initially received an estimate of $5,870.00 from Leath & Sons Inc. on April
3, 2019. Due to the unknown condition of the downstream sewer pipe (possibly
20’ to 100’ in length) beyond this area to be repaired, and staff wasn’t able
to safely estimate a contingency amount at that time. Leath & Sons, Inc.
started work on this emergency dig-up on Monday, April 8th.
On
Tuesday, April 9th we identified 35 additional feet of work at the top of the
project area. Staff was able to CCTV the remainder of the line downstream and
found a failed drop structure at the manhole connection and another 15’ of pipe
to remove and replace just outside of this manhole. The original emergency memo
in the amount of $5,870.00 was for 10’ of sanitary sewer pipe removal and
replacement. The revised emergency memo for $15,080.00 in repairs is for 60’ of
sanitary sewer pipe removal and replacement. That is the difference in the
price increase.
The
Board approved a resolution approving the purchase two stainless- steel augur
spreaders from American Equipment Company off the city of Kansas City Missouri
cooperative purchase contract in an amount not to exceed $35,000.The Public
Works Department staff obtained a quote from the KCMO cooperative purchasing
agreement with American Equipment Company ($14,419.00) for the stainless-steel
auger spreader. Public works will purchase 2 of these, as budgeted. The attached
quote is for $14,419.00 and x2 is $28,838.00, which is within the budgeted
amount of $35,000.00. The remainder of the budgeted amount, $6,162.00, will be
used for contingency. The Capital Sales Tax Fund has $35,000.00 budgeted for
salt spreaders.
The
Board approved a resolution approving the purchase of a 2020 Ford Explorer from
Shawnee Mission Ford, off the Johnson County Kansas cooperative purchasing
contract in an amount not to exceed $35,000.The current Ford Escape owned by
the City is a 2008 model. The bodywork (rust) on the existing vehicle is half
the value of the vehicle to repair. The Public Works Department staff obtained
quotes from the Johnson County Kansas Cooperative Contract with Shawnee Mission
Ford, Inc. for a new 2020 Ford Explorer base model 4x4.
The
attached quote is for $29,097.00 and is within the budgeted amount of
$35,000.00. The remainder of the budgeted amount, $5,903.00, will be used for
the in-house upfitting for lights, decals, and contingency. The existing Ford
Escape will be put up for auction. The Capital Sales Tax Fund has $35,000.00
budgeted for the replacement vehicle.
The
Board approved a resolution authorizing participation by the city in the “Click
It or Ticket” Enforcement Campaign and authorizing an application through the
Missouri Department of Transportation Highway Safety & Traffic division.
The Police Department would like to participate and make an application for
grant funding for the 2019 Click It or Ticket Enforcement Campaign through the
Missouri Department of Transportation’s Highway & Safety Division for the
2019 fiscal year. If awarded, the billed hours worked by officers of the
Raytown, Missouri Police Department will be reimbursed at the rate of 100%.
The
Raytown Police Department intends to utilize these funds to locate, apprehend
and deter hazardous driving, with attention focused on the utilization of
safety belts, within the Raytown City limits. With the extra officers
designated to participate in this grant, it is perceived that injuries
associated with non-use of factory installed safety belts during motor vehicle
crashes within the Raytown city limits will be decreased as well. The grant, if
awarded, allows for $750.00 dollars to be used for overtime assignments, and
will be reimbursed at 100% to the city. There is no match required by the City
for this grant.
The
Board approved a resolution authorizing the purchase of a single axle dump
truck body, plow, spreader and hydraulics from American Equipment company off
the Kansas City Missouri cooperative purchase contract in an amount not to
exceed $78,546.The current dump truck owned by the City is 16 years old.
Maintenance costs have become excessive due to the age of the vehicle. The
Public Works Department staff obtained a quote from the KCMO cooperative purchasing
agreement with American Equipment Company ($75,546.00) for the dump truck body,
plow, spreader and hydraulics.
The
following RBA will be for this dump truck’s chassis. A contingency amount of
$3,000.00 will be used for the in-house upfitting of lights and decals – making
the cost $78,546.00. The Capital Sales Tax Fund has $165,000.00 budgeted for a
single-axle dump truck with spreader.
The
Board approved a resolution authorizing the purchase of a 2020 International
truck chassis from Summit Truck Group off the Johnson County Kansas cooperative
purchase contract in an amount not to exceed $86,454.The current dump truck
owned by the City is 16 years old. Maintenance costs have become excessive due
to the age of the vehicle.
To leave a comment use this link
34 comments:
Hey, thank you to Mr. Ward for the research you have done. It is very enlightening. And, as always, thank you Greg for giving him a platform to share it with the public. It is nice to read some "real news" about Raytown. Keep up the good work. It is beginning to look like the voters chose wisely in the last election.
I never did see Mr. Ward's poll on Raytown Unleashed. I thought he was going to post it on there as well after he said he "didn't have time yet" to post it.
Someone called this poll a "push poll". I remember Mr. Ward saying it could have been a more extensive poll but that would have cost him money to implement.
Put it on the ballot at least and let the voters decide if they want a Parks tax increase.
Keep in mind Mr. Ward has never had to knock on one constituent doorstep to hear their views or wish list. 81 people responding to that survey are a far cry from the voting citizens of Raytown. I was dissapointed that while he had no opponent in Ward 5 election in April he chose to not even spend any respectable amount of time thanking those voters who showed up to vote for him. He casts a distant non friendly shadow. And frankly I don't want him making MY mind up for me whether I want to spend an additional 14 dollars a year for the parks which have also proven a revenue need. Put together a progressive well thought out tax package Mr. Ward and others and the citizens of Raytown will once again decide on the merits of the ballot measure. Our City's future does NOT lie on $14.00 a year!
I too was surprised that Mr. Ward did not draw an opponent. Maybe it was because he was the Mayor's appointment, approved by ALL of the members of the BOA. Could also be may of the people believed he was doing a good job.
I read Alderman Ward's poll from the first to the last question.
It most definitely is NOT a push poll.
What the Park Board put out two years ago is classic push poll. It only covered one subject, that was Raytown Parks. It gave not alternatives to what they wanted done except to keep spending like their was no tomorrow. And spend they did. The pollsters they employed cost the city over $70,000!
Mr. Ward's poll cost the city NOTHING.
Mr. Ward's poll considered all of the city department needs, including police, streets, storm sewers, home values and parks.
I think Mr. Ward's poll was an honest and balanced attempt to find out the priorities of the people in Raytown. I wish our other Board members would show as much initiative as he did.
Sounds like Whoever wrote those earlier attacks on Alderman Ward are probably angry because Parks came out dead last in every category.
May 12, 2019 at 5:07 PM
Mr. Ward admitted that the poll would have been more extensive but that he didn't want to spend $40.00 out of his own pocket to fund it.
I took the poll.
I wonder if some folks took the poll several times which would skew the results.
Good question. I do know that 80 responses in the short time the poll was up is a pretty impressive return. The answers are pretty pretty consistent with what I know people to believe in Raytown. Most do want better streets and more police protection ahead of a splash park or a dog park. Why not give the majority of the people what they want?
There is only one way to know for sure what the majority want.
I wonder how many of the folks wanting us to spend more money on are parks do not live in Raytown.
Look at the person form Independence that wants to tell us want she and the mayor want us to hear.
Now we have Bob Smith with people from all over the metro and beyond telling us what to do with are parks.
Maybe a 501C3 is needed for the parks and thees out of towners can fund it.
Please do not construe the following to be against the Raytown Digest. I operate a Mac and I went to
the Raytown Digest as I find it a good site. While I was on the site and moving around on it I received
a warning MACOS 10.7 Virus Found, the site wanted me to click on SCAN THE MAC which I did not
do as my son told me that this would connect me to a Malware virus.
As I say the Raytown Digest is a good location, nothing against it but be careful if the preceding would
happen to you.
Thank you
14 dollars a year is per person (including infants) and relies on data 9 years old at this point.
I agree. Ward got nearly the same amount of responses as the parks survey.
The majority doesn't vote, so a vote wouldn't tell you that either. Less than 5 percent voted in the last election and that was an important one with publicity.
I didn't know it was still active since it served it's purpose and the election was swung.
If the city keeps asking for money on things over 70% of us voting don't want do you thing we are going to approve anything as we will believe as it appears clear you don't listen to us so why expect you to after we give you money.
We have asked for something to be done about code issues and like a horse with binders on codes drives right past countless eyesores.
Until you start listing and delivering on what we are already paying for you simply don't need any more money!
Thank you Alderman Ward for creating the survey and letting us know we are not the only ones who believe our roads and police protection should come first.
Two things I would like to comment on. First I think Raytown Digest is a total waste of time and energy to even try and read it and all the nonsense he writes. Second. I will call my alderman and ask that they don not give the parks anymore money. How they talked about the alderman and the name calling they don't deserve anything more.
Ok you win Ward. I'll give you my extra $14.00 that I was going to give to the Parks for their needs. How much Police/Streets that going buy me?
Does anyone know why the parks board awards contracts to their campaign brokers? Is it a pay to play? They handed out campaign materials during the last meeting too.
I can see great things from this new Board and it's only been 2 meetings!
Well, it will basically give the police the full budget they asked for, taking us from 36 officers to 60+. Buying new radar, a $26,000 office furniture set for the Cheif, new radar and 3 new patrol cars. That's what you 14 dollar buys... or a splash pad, your choice.
Whoever said that is wrong. They couldnt direct business to anyone in particulars, only the real board could award contracts, the parks just advises, they are only volunteers as the mayor and alderman Greene have pointed out many times.
Slow down their cowboy. The City Council has not yet named a new Cheif of police. Before we buy new office furniture lets see who is selected to be the head of the p.d. As for radar guns, how about dusting off the ones that have been sitting on the shelf for so long under the past cheif of police. What is this about a fight at city hall. The only one I've seen get angry is the mayor. Don't blame the city council because he has a short fuse.
So 5/15 3:30 you are trying to tell us that the 1/4 % increase that is projected to net around 277k to the Parks Dept is going to fund 24 OFFICERS plus all the other items listed? Is that your final answer? Please tell me there were several typos in that equation. Either that or stop contracting out your cost analysis work to Tony Jacob!
Leadership never has been a component of this Mayor. If you want a baby kissing, hand shaking, Santa Claus, I like Mike type of Mayor he's your guy. Doesn't make him bad guy, but your dig into the trenches do the dirty work regardless of public opinion lies within the board. That was shown with the last group. Whether this board will show the same moxy and roll up their sleeves when the bullets start flying is yet to be determined. I do like the shift to Alderman Mims as Mayor Pro Tem. Savvy experienced leader with some connections and respect within the board. Job 1 is rebuilding trust within the community especially the voting sector. The keys to the rebuild lies in their ability to connect to the citizens and hold the difficult but honest conversations required to gain trust and open their wallets. And that takes a special skillset not always prevalent.
The fact of the matter is Raytown is not on the news once a month because we don’t have a splash pad, when was the last time you told someone you live in Raytown and they said oh I hear your parks are in need of repair, or your neighbor said they were going to rent their house out so they could move somewhere that has better tennis courts. Raytown has needs and wants, if this Board cannot recognize the difference between the two then we will elect ones that do.
@May 14, 2019 at 9:12 AM
$14 x 30,000 residents x 10 years (a typical tax length) = $4.2 million. Given that our road study indicates that we need to spend roughly $3 million per year to stabilize and make marginal upgrades to our roads, that $14 a person would pay for roughly 14% of our needed road repairs.
Alternatively, it would probably fund around 4 full time traffic officers.
Both of those, are in my opinion, preferable to a splash pad and dog park that will generate no revenue and have large, annual operating expenses.
Derek Ward
Alderman, Ward 5
The parks board has had several very loud discussions themselves. They've even resorted to calling the Aldermen "idiots".
Alderman Ward, does it get tiring always spinning the facts to suit your position? It sounds like you are saying parks is trying to get $4.2 million over the next 10 years to pay for a splash pad and a dog park. That sounded pretty excesive to me so I did some basic math.
Going off the numbers from their presentations, if parks were to get the increase they are asking for with the current storm water split over 10 years, over $500k of that would go to pay off the TIFF, parks would end up with around $2.8 million extra, and storm water would end up with over $800,000 extra for repairs. That sounds like a win-win for the city to me.
As for all that money going to a dog park and a splash pad I did some more math. The parks director estimated it would cost around $450k total for both of those projects. That comes to only 16% of that extra $2.8 million. What is that left over $2,350,000 going to? Oh I seem to remember the parks director with a list of the crumbling infrastructure needs that money is going to, including a big chunk of the reserves the parks are sitting on.
Alderman Ward, please don't take us for fools and lose our trust. You are going to need it when you come asking for more money once again.
"Alderman Ward, please don't take us for fools and lose our trust. You are going to need it when you come asking for more money once again."
"Anonymous", Alderman Ward DEFINITELY has our trust. He's out there getting it done.
And (gasp!) he signs his name.
Parks are wants, roads and police are needs. It’s people with your type of attitude that the city is hurting due to small portion they get. I’m sure you voted to give the schools and fire district the ridiculous amount of money they get.
Parks are not infrastructure
@May 16, 2019 at 9:10 PM
You are correct about the initial expense to build the splash pad and dog park. But those are just the one time cost. Both will require maintenance and significant expenditures to run. My point, however, was to answer the question regarding how much $14 a person would get us in terms of road repairs (or police staffing).
Mr Ward,
Thank you for trying to find ways more the citizens can easily provide feedback and opinion.
We would be wrong if we don't also thank Mr. Walters for allowing us to post our thoughts, concerns and things you both as elected officials should be looking into.
I for one are not alone based on conversations over lunch and dinner with other citizens as to why that the city is no longer operating EMS that the director of EMS (Doug) is still on the city payroll.
We all know the city has many expense that can not be addresses for lack of funding so how can you justify this individual being on the payroll.
It is little things like this that have many knowing that the city still didn't get the message after last summers triple play of NO to the request for additional tax dollars.
Cleanup the house before asking for any additional funds regardless if it is for parks, police or streets because we have to see our elected officials are able to manage our tax dollars wisely before giving more money that is continued to be wasted.
I for one can say after such a wet spring we aren't concerned about the parks, but we are deeply concerned about the storm waters issues of the city. Give more money to storm water issues and not parks.
Post a Comment