BY GREG WALTERS |
Park is a Wake-Up Call
One
week has passed since two gunmen attacked a group of about 50 teenagers and
young adults at Colman Park. For those living around the park, the memory of
what transpired has not been dulled by the passage of time.
There
had been an increase in traffic on the streets leading up to the park that
evening. But the noise level coming from the park was tolerable. Apparently no
one bothered to call the police after the 11:00 p.m. curfew had passed.
One and
one-half hours later, at 12:30 a.m. Saturday morning, all of the neighborhoods
surrounding Colman Park were awakened by the sound of semi-automatic gunfire.
What
followed was surreal . . . confused cries and yelling coming from the park,
police and ambulance sirens . . . a panicked telephone call from a neighbor
whose house had been hit by stray bullets.
Later I
would learn three homes and the Park Department Maintenance Garage had been shot
up.
It was difficult to watch all of the neighbor's house lights turned on only to realize one house remained dark. You know the person living there was home for the evening. You
call on the phone only to get a voice mail. Did the neighbor get hit by a stray
bullet?
I
finally took a spare key we kept of our neighbors house and enlisted the help of two policemen to go into the house. All was well. Some people sleep very soundly!
AFTERMATH . . . City parks can be a
blessing for the neighborhoods surrounding them. Parks break the monotony of
street after street of houses.
They can be a peaceful gathering place where
neighbors can relax, walk the dog and visit with friends.
Parks
can also become a place seen as dangerous, a place to avoid . . . especially at night.
It has reached that point at Colman Park. Anyone who does not recognize this
is in denial.
One neighbor told me she is having a hard time explaining to
her granddaughter why they can no longer visit her favorite city park (Colman Park).
Another
told me she is expecting one of her children to visit her soon from out of
state. She said it was difficult to hear her own child ask to stay in a bedroom
that does not face Colman Park because "bullets can go through walls."
These
reactions are understandable. It is also makes it very clear changes need to be
made in how we manage our city parks.
TIME FOR A SOLUTION .
. . The
tragic murder of a 17 year old girl in one of our city’s largest parks is a
wake-up call that should not be ignored.
The
simple truth is that our police cannot be everywhere at one time. In fact, our
Acting Chief of Police, Randy Hudspeth, shared with me that officers were engaged
in calls at other city parks when the active shooter alert reached them a week
ago early last Saturday morning.
Had
the city’s curfew been enforced last Friday night, there would have been one
less murder in Raytown. The murdered girl would still be enjoying life. The
homes, the broken glass, the public buildings would be unblemished by bullets.
For
those reasons I am asking the Board of Aldermen to form a Safe Parks Committee
to review and develop policies aimed at making our parks safer.
I move that I be
authorized to create a Committee, consisting of the following member classes:
·
(2)
Public Safety Personnel – including Police and Fire/Ambulance.
·
(2)
Raytown Park Board members to include, at the Park Board’s discretion, one Park
Department staff member.
·
(2)
Aldermen
·
(2 to 4)
Qualified residents living adjacent or near our city’s parks.
· Any
other person who may have expertise or experience necessary or beneficial to
complete the task at hand.
That the Committee has the following charge:
·
Investigate
park safety issues.
·
Investigate
remedial steps to address park safety issues.
Other Publications Discuss
Secure Our Parks!
BY MICHAEL ANDERSON Re-printed with permission from Raytown Digest
The
shooting at Colman Park was a wake-up call for the return of law and order to
our City. Residents in the area near Colman
Park have complained for many years about the homeless population, drug
activity, unauthorized fireworks, and occasional random acts of violence.
Some
advocate for the closing of Colman Park. I do not. The answer for Colman Park
is really quite simple.
Lane
Avenue should be transferred to the control of the Parks Board and should be
gated when the park is closed. Next, a
tall, decorative fence should be installed along the park property adjacent to
59th street.
Fortunately,
most of Colman Park is surrounded by residential homes which should reduce the
cost of fencing the property.
This is
an easy and cost efficient solution to bringing public safety back to Colman
Park and it's long overdue! Easy
solution, but politics is never easy!
Park Board Meets with
Colman Park Neighbors
Last
Monday evening the Raytown Park Board met with about a dozen residents from
neighborhoods surrounding Colman Park. Board members listened to neighbor’s concern
that City Ordinances are not being enforced at Colman Park.
One
speaker told the Board that if the problem is not addressed that Colman Park
would gain a reputation of a park where anything goes. Discussion included
stricter enforcement of curfews and enforcement of city laws addressing
amplified music at Colman Park.
Many of
the attendees suggested the Parks be “gated” at curfew to dissuade individuals
from hanging out after the park is closed.
Current
City ordinances set curfews at 11:00 p.m. during the summer months. Amplified
music is specifically not allowed by City Ordinances.
Park
Board members urged the area neighborhoods to call the police whenever a
violation is noted.
Ward 1
Alderman Greg Walters and Ward 5 Alderman Derek Ward were in attendance at the
meeting. Ward 5 Alderman Bonnaye Mims had an earlier commitment but did arrive while testimony was being given.
Infrastructure Needs Addressed
BY WARD 5 ALDERMAN DERRICK WARD
A
little less than one year ago, Raytown hired a consultant, Stantec, to evaluate
the overall and specific conditions of our streets and roads. Although the report was discussed at a public
Board of Alderman meeting and is available to the public for review, many
residents have never seen it.
The
following is a brief summary of the report’s findings and recommendations.
According to Stantec:
According
to Stantec, as of mid-2018, the cost to fix our roads was approximately $36
million dollars. This last winter season
placed a huge stress on our paved surfaces.
Without immediate action, the condition of our streets and roads will
likely decrease rapidly, as wear leads to more wear. Also, obviously, the cost of everything rises
yearly. More repairs at higher prices is
the only possible outcome if we don’t fix our roads soon. While I expect that we will struggle to
finance over $30 million in road repairs, we could be facing a $100 million
bill if we delay even a few years.
- Using lasers, accelerometers, GPS, computers and other hardware, Stantec inspected every lane mile of paved surfaces owned by the City. Raytown has approximately 330 lane miles of roads and streets.
- The replacement cost of Raytown’s streets and roads is nearly half a billion dollars.
- On a scale of 1-100, with 100 being a perfect road, Raytown’s roads scored, on average, 41 on one scale and a 46 on another scale. A score of 41 is “poor” and only one point above “Very Poor”.
- Only 12% (approximately) of all Raytown streets and roads are in “Good” or “Excellent” Condition.
- Approximately 67% of all Raytown streets and roads are in “Poor”, “Very Poor”, “Serious” or “Failed” condition.
Of
course, streets and roads are not the only pressing issue facing our city. As this spring’s rains have reminded
everyone, our storm water management needs are very real, and our Park department
would like to construct new amenities for our residents.
Therefore,
I encourage city staff and my fellow aldermen to explore funding options,
including general obligation bonds, as suggested by Alderman Ryan Myers. We cannot afford to keep kicking this can
down the road for others to fix. We must
be willing to make the sacrifices necessary to maintain our basic
infrastructure. Failing to do so will
doom our chances for significant development and can only depress our property
values.
The Paul Livius Report
Raytown Board of Aldermen Meeting – June 18,
2019
PUBLIC COMMENTS: Mindy McDaniel
addressed the Board about neighborhood safety concerns at Coleman Park in the
wake of the shooting a week ago last Friday.
Tony
Jacob addressed the Board regarding a number of city issues, including public
safety and budget concerns.
The Board approved a resolution approving the reappointment of Tommy Bettis, Mary Phyl, Dwight Robinson and KevinWilson to the Planning and Zoning Commission.
The Board approved a resolution approving the reappointment of Loretha Hayden, David Thurman and Robbie Tubbs to the Raytown Park Board.
The Board heard the first reading of an ordinance amending chapter 50 (zoning) of the code of ordinances in order to add Article XI and add Article XII, Medical Marijuana. In November, 2018, Missouri voters approved an amendment to the Missouri Constitution that legalized the growing, manufacturing, transportation, consumption and sale of Marijuana for medicinal purposes only.
Those regulations were finalized by the Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services on May 24, 2019, providing staff fairly solid regulatory guidelines to go by in preparing this Ordinance. This same state agency plans to begin considerations of applications for Medical Marijuana Facilities statewide on August 3, 2019, necessitating this Ordinance to give the City some control over their siting and operations.
This Ordinance, designed to be consistent with state law while also protecting Raytown neighborhoods and residents from the undesirable impacts of Medical Marijuana operations, is an entirely new Article XII addition to Chapter 50 of the Raytown Municipal Code. Included in the Ordinance are new medical marijuana-specific definitions, detailed requirements for citing the various types of facilities and types of approval methods required, and basic regulations for residential based medical marijuana operations.
Article XI of Chapter 50 is also amended to add reserved sections for future code amendments and contains no other changes. Staff worked closely with legal counsel, reviewed similar Ordinances passed by other Missouri cities, and considered other related codes such as Building and Fire Codes as this Ordinance was being drafted. An open-to-the-public informational meeting was held by the Planning Commission on May 7, 2019, at which Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services representatives and legal counsel representing the City provided presentations and answered citizen questions after the meeting.
The Planning and Zoning Commission held a Public Hearing on the marijuana hearing on June 6, 2019. At which time the Commission offered recommendations outside of the State recommended guidelines.
Ward 4 Alderman Bill Van Buskirk offered a motion to eliminate the Planning and Zoning Commission recommendations and re-instating the State recommendations.
29 comments:
Roads are failing, make an ad hoc, roads still in disrepair.
Parks wants a 1/4 tax, make an ad hoc, parks didn't get their tax.
Want crime reduced, make an ad hoc, will crime reduce? Not if the past teaches us anything. Instead roads are worse, parks got only half, so crime will be worse than when we started.
The Coleman Park troubles will be difficult to solve with gates and fencing. That is, unless there is a dedicated buy-in from the Raytown PD.
Keep in mind that each night when it's closing time, someone (who can deal with unruly drunk or drugged people who may be armed), will have to conduct a sweep through the park to clear out remaining "patrons".
Is that something the PD wants or is willing to do?? Probably not!
I don't blame them either. That amounts to putting your life on the line nightly, and for what?
Yes, fencing and gates sounds like an easy, obvious fix but, in reality, it could be much more complex to solve.
Wrong. Police come and lock the gates, no confrontation needed. They make gates that can take a hit from a semi and resist grinders and torches.
Word will get out quick.
How are the parks going to pay for it? They only have 1.3 million in reserves.
I don't understand why it is necessary for citizens to report parks in use after the curfew of 11PM. Many people are in bed by then. The Police officers on patrol in that area should be responsible for making sure the parks have been exited! As stated by 5:46 AM parks should be fenced, gated, and gates locked at closing time. A specific person or employee function should be assigned responsibility for making sure each park is vacant and then secure the gate(s). Another person or job function should be appointed to unlock the gate(s) in the morning.
Andy Whiteman
That's easy for you to say, Andy. You don't live here and you don't pay taxes here. Please send your ideas on how to spend tax dollars to some place where you actually pay taxes.
Didn't you read the comments 2 weeks ago from the less summit crew that's use our tennis courts for free and their ideas on how to spend our tax money? Between them, Andy and Susie I think the mayor's nontaxpaying friends not living here need to find a new hobby.
How do you pay for anything? You make a judgment decision. How much is a life worth? We lost one innocent soul when she was murdered at Colman Park just a over a week ago. Do we wait for another tragedy? Gates are not terribly expensive. And they work! It is why Cave Spring Park has gates. Drive up and down Blue Ridge Cutoff. You will see gates everywhere. The Truman Sports Complex, business and churches south all the way to Grandview have gates. Even the Raytown Park Board has installed gates at its largest park (the Little Blue Trace Soccer and Softball Fields).
Both Jackson and Johnson County gate their parks at night to enforce curfews. It works there. It can work here.
I am in agreement with anyone that thinks the parks should be gated. It's not the only answer , but I think it's a good part of the solution. Now is the time to make sure things don't get worse. It would be sn absolutely bad decision for people to stop using the park. That would only encourage more troubling people and events.
I thank Mr. Walters for taking point on this issue. I think he's raised some excellent options worth exploring. Aside from gates and fencing, there are also other options that may have merit, such as more cameras and motion activated lights. Hopefully, his planned committee can weigh the various benefits and costs to produce a good set of recommendations.
More immediately, I met with the acting Chief and Dave Turner last week. The Chief is very willing to let parks pay for an additional computer and large screen monitor for the dispatching office. Currently, without a dedicated system, the dispatcher has to manually pull up the park camera system. This is difficult to do when shifts get busy. This isn't the police department's fault, it is just a flaw in the system.
With the new equipment that parks intends to purchase, there will be a large display of park cameras continually visible in the dispatch office. That way, if the dispatcher sees headlights at 1AM, they can simply send a unit to investigate. Of course, this won't stop people from hanging out in the shadows if they arrive on foot or solve every problem. But it is a start.
I am confident that working with Parks, the planned committee will be able to make some important changes. Thanks for taking the lead, Greg.
Derek A. Ward
Alderman, Ward 5
So now the police will be tasked with the continuous monitoring of the parks and dispatching patrol personnel when headlights are spotted or ?????
Please, just put up some gates and get off the High-Tech approach to this ongoing problem with a group of troublemakers.
Spending money on bigger displays and sophisticated surveillance systems may be more cool but sometimes simple is more effective.
Pretty sure that is the case now. Our patrol officers should not have to concern themselves with anything at any of the parks between 11 PM and dawn.
Please use the money that will be spent on Tech and build some gates. For now just gates. Leave the fences until there is a proven need.
@June 26, 2019 at 6:52 AM - I am not opposed to gates, as long as we can meet Fire, Police and EMS concerns about not slowing response times.
The cost of the monitor and computer are minimal and the dispatcher won't have to focus on it. Rather, it will simply hang in the dispatch room. If there is significant action in the parks that shows up on the monitor, they can respond. The advantage to the extra monitor is that it can be done almost immediately with funds already allocated to this category of expenses.
Other, more comprehensive solutions will take some time to sort through.
Last year the chief refused to put an officer that would be paid for by the parks dept in the parks to keep fireworks users from littering. I hope this new chief will not be as dumb. Does anyone know what to expect?
I assume we’re concerned with all the parks correct? Not just the one?
No. I think they're only concerned with Coleman Park. No one has complained here, or on Facebook, about any of the other parks. They only want to protect Coleman.
Well what about the parks that aren't even inside Raytown City limits? Isn't the Raytown Parks in charge of that 30 acres down by Noland Rd and 350? Should get away from that one.
Great, another committee. Just what we needed. The city should take the $140,000 they pay the city administrator with zero experience and the $100,000 they pay the assistant city administrator (zero experience) and use that money to provide more police protection. Maybe even save another $100,000 by reducing the top heavy pd admin office with reduction of a captain or two.
The city manages the park on Noland Road, but when the contract runs out their supposed to stop. We could have another cop on the street but we're having to spend $100,000 on a audit.
Yeah, that's this year's excuse when it isn't even budgeted.
What was the excuse the last 2 years?
The purpose of the Safe Parks Committee is to "review and develop policies aimed at making our parks safer". That includes ALL of our parks. The Police, Fire Department/Ambulance have agreed to participate in the Committee's work, as has the Raytown Park Board. The Committee will also have two members of the Raytown Board of Aldermen and four private citizens as its members.
I hope that clears up any question as to the goal of the Committee.
Next Tuesday the Board of Aldermen will vote whether or not to form the Safe Parks Committee.
A similar committee was formed in May at the request of Ward 3 Alderman Ryan Myers. Their work is to investigate
Is the Safe Parks committee the one you formed or the one the mayor formed? Why do we need two committees?
Phil - Greg can correct me if I am wrong, but I believe the intended purposes and scope are very different. The Mayor wants to find some big answers to some big problems. His committee, as I understand it, will look to find community wide solutions for a variety of community wide problems. Greg wants to focus on smaller, but concrete issues dealing with park security. I see them as very complimentary.
Just heard on the news the Jackson County may freeze the property values for 2019 because of all the problems. How funny would it be for the School District to waste all that money to deceive us to gain a huge increase only to have it negated from them... Thats what you call Karma folks
The school district will still get 70 percent of our taxes, the highest in the state. Meanwhile the fire district will also get the highest levy in an urban city, and the city itself will get one of the lowest portions for the whole state. And the lowest of all fourth class.
Sounds smart to me.
Well said, Derek. You are correct. The scope of the Mayor's committee covers problems throughout the city as regards crime. The Park Safety Committee is limited to a study of security problems within our parks. The goal is to make recommendations to make our parks safer.
Acting Raytown Chief of Police Randy Hudspeth, Raytown Fire Protection Ditrict Fire Chief Matt Mace, and Raytown Park Board Director Dave Turner, have all agreed to work with the Committee. I have met with City Administrator Damon Hodges. Mr. Hodges has agreed to assist the Committee if any help is required from City Staff. Also serving on the Committee will be a represent from the Raytown Park Board, two member from the Board of Aldermen and four private citizens.
It is important to know the Committee is not a governing body and can only make recommendations. Any final decision on those recommendations must be approved by the Board of Aldermen before being enacted.
It is also true the Mayor has appointed a task force to look at ways to fight crime throughout the city. I applaud his determination and willingness to look at all aspects of what appears to be a crime wave in Raytown. I look forward to the solutions his committee will bring to the table for the Board of Aldermen to consider.
I bought some fireworks today at a local tent. But the police stopped by to tell my kids they had to stop shooting them and could only shoot them off on the fourth, why are they selling them if we can't use them until next week?!
I don't know about your children and the shooting of fireworks. Consider it like Christmas. You probably buy those same kids Christmas gifts each year. You may even wrap them up and put them under a Christmas tree. But you do not let the open those packages until Christmas. The same reasons could be used for fireworks. You purchase them before the Fourth of July but you are not allowed to shoot them off until the Fourth of JULY.
Makes sense to me.
I think legal fireworks days in Raytown are July 3, 4, and 5
10:12 am - fireworks are only legal on July 4 from 10am to 11pm and July 5 from 12pm to 10pm.
Post a Comment