Wednesday, August 21, 2019

Park Board Votes to Hire Private
Security to Enforce Park Curfews
BY GREG WALTERS
At its monthly Monday night meeting the Raytown Park Board voted to hire a private security firm to enforce curfew laws at Raytown City Parks.

Park Board Director Dave Turner laid out a plan by which all Raytown city parks within the city limits will be patrolled when curfew begins at 11:00 p.m.

The two largest parks, Colman and Kenagy Park, will have nightly patrols every day of the week. Smaller Raytown parks, Southwood, Minor Smith and Kritser will also be patrolled. All patrolling of parks will begin at curfew and then at unspecified times throughout the night.

The decision by the Park Board comes in the wake of recommendations by the Raytown Parks Improvement Committee (PIC).

The PIC Committee had recommended a three part plan for consideration by the Park Board for improving safety in Raytown parks. The first goal set was for immediate implementation of nightly patrols to enforce curfew laws in Raytown City Parks.

The second recommendation was for the use of bollards or large rocks, similar to those used at Royals Stadium and the Starlight Theatre, to dissuade vehicles from being driven on grassy areas of city parks.

The third recommendation was to consider the use of gates to close city parks to vehicular traffic after curfew begins. The city’s legal counsel researched the question of closing a city street that has no residential or commercial entrances. She settled the debate by clarifying the city had the right to close streets and parks during curfew hours.

Park Board Director Turner proposed the Park Board adopt the use of nightly patrols for a two to three month period and then evaluate the results to see if any additional steps need to be taken.

Ward 1 Alderman Greg Walters, who served as Chairman of the PIC Committee, said he was pleased with the Park Board’s decision.

Walters praised the Park Board and the members of the PIC Committee in coming up with a solution.

“Not everyone got all they wanted,” said Walters. “I see it as a healthy compromise and what can be accomplished when we join together to reach a common goal.”

Other Park News . . . 
NEW LIGHTS TO BE INSTALLED AT CITY PARKS: The Raytown Parks Board has approved the installation of additional lighting at four Raytown Parks. The new lights are solar powered LED lights. The lights are to be used at areas of the park identified as too dark for cameras to detect motion.

FREE INTERNET SERVICE TO BEGIN OPERATION AT CITY PARKS: Raytown Parks has also adopted a plan to provide free WIFI service at city parks in Raytown. According to Park Board Director Dave Turner, “The service plan we were offered was so inexpensive, we decided to take advantage of the opportunity for the people of Raytown.

ACCORDING TO LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIALS there is a plus side to the WIFI option most are unaware of. When anybody is in range for free WIFI service, they can be automatically tracked as long as their cell phone is on. All the user has to do is make sure their cell phone has its WIFI receiver “on” to enable the tracking. If a person does not wish to be covered by the WIFI service they need only to turn off the option on their cell phone.

THE WIFI OPTION also opens the possibility of adding additional wireless surveillance cameras at low cost to the parks security system.  

Board of Aldermen Poised
to Raise Sanitary Sewer Bills
The Raytown Board of Aldermen is considering increasing the rate Raytown taxpayers pay for their sanitary sewer bills for a third consecutive year. 

The Board, which has the option to reduce or not increase the sewer billing rate, brought some interesting debate to the table.

Ward 1 Alderman Greg Walters reminded the Board that taxpayers are feeling pummeled by tax increases. He pointed out that most Raytown taxpayers will see large increases in their property tax this coming year due to unprecedented property tax valuation from Jackson County Executive Frank White’s administration.

Walters pointed out the fund has a reserve of over $500,000 and suggested it be tapped for any increase in sewer rates this year.

Not all members of the Board shared Walters position on the sewer tax increase.

Ward 5 Alderman Bonnaye Mims attempted to set aside the regular rules of business by suspending the rules to allow for a vote on the measure just 15 minutes after it had been read into the record.

The City Attorney reminded the Board that such rate increases are required to have a public hearing before being voted upon. 

The tax increase question was carried over for consideration at the September 3, 2019 meeting of the Board.

At that meeting a Public Hearing will be held for members of the public to voice their opinion on the proposed sanitary sewer tax increase. The meeting is open to the public and any Raytown citizen will be allowed up to five minutes to voice their support or objection to the rate increase.

For more information about the rate increase contact the office of the City Administrator or the City Clerk at Raytown City Hall.

BY PAUL LIVIUS
The Paul Livius Report
Raytown Board of Aldermen Meeting
August 20, 2019

The Board tabled until September 17, 2019, an ordinance approving a conditional use permit for MohamedAlsiyouhi to operate a vehicle repair use at 9100 E. 350 Highway.  Mohamed Alsiyouhi, the applicant, has a lease agreement with the property owner, Henry Machauf, tooperate a tire and minor auto repair shop in the former Auto Cool building which has been vacant since 2016.

The 2-bay building was originally designed and built for minor automotive work in the 1960s or 1970s and the requested use would be consistent with the original purpose of the building and consistent with automotive work previously performed on the site. The building was continuously occupied by the most recent business, Auto Cool, from 1998 until 2016. Several conditions of approval were attached to the Conditional Use by staff and concurred with by the Planning Commission relating to required property maintenance and upgrades to bring the property up to current code requirements.

The Board heard the first and second readings, then passed the ordinance repealing Ordinance No. 5603-19 and enacting a new ordinance to clarify the ballot language authorizing and approving the extension of the one-eighth of one percent parks/storm water control sales tax. More specifically, the ballot language is being amended to include the division of funds between parks and storm water control.

The Parks Sales tax was first approved by voters in November 2003 as a Local Parks sales tax. In May of 2010, staff was directed to draft a renewal that was consistent with statutory language to include Storm Water Control.
At the May 21, 2019 Board of Aldermen meeting, the Board adopted Ordinance 5603-19 authorizing and supporting the submission of ballot language to renew the Parks/Storm Water Control Sales Tax for a five-year term. Should that Ordinance be rescinded per the request of the Sponsoring Alderman, a replacement ordinance would need to be approved immediately if the Board desires to place the measure on the November 5, 2019 the ballot.

While Ordinance 5603-19 stated the current Board’s direction for the division of the funds between local parks and storm water control (75% of the monies received from the tax would be dedicated to local parks and 25% of the monies received would be dedicated to storm water control), the ballot language did not clearly state for the voter such division. If the division of funds language is not included in the ballot language, the intent in Ordinance 5603-19 could be subject to change by future Board of Aldermen during the five (5) year term. The proposed ordinance clarifies in the ballot language the division of sales tax proceeds and protects such intent from being changed without the vote of qualified voters in the City of Raytown during the five-year term.

The Board heard the first reading of an ordinance amending chapter 44, of the code of ordinances of the City of Raytown.  Over the past several years, sewer treatment costs have risen for treatment services provided by Kansas City Missouri (KCMO) and Little Blue Valley Sewer District (LBVSD).

For several years, City staff was able to maintain the City rate through the implementation of numerous cost-saving programs. In order to be compliant with funding requirements associated with debt issued for the sewer fund, the sewer rate will need to be increased approximately 7% across the board. This will ensure sustainability of the fund. Based on historical increases from KCMO and LBVSD there will be additional increases needed in future years. Due to rising costs in treatment, maintenance, and operations, staff is recommending the following adjustments to Chapter 44:


1)   Amend c (4) to read Base Rate - the Base Rate shall be $[16.00] 17.12 [Sixteen dollars] Seventeen dollars and Twelve cents per month.
2)   Amend c (9) to read Variable rate. The revenue charge expressed in per 1,000 gallons that is derived when the annual variable rate revenue requirement is divided by the customer volumes, estimated to be $[9.84] 10.53 [Nine dollars and Eighty-four] Ten dollars and Fifty-three cents (See Attached) per 1,000 gallons, in excess of 1,000 gallons. 


To leave a comment use this link
POST A COMMENT

30 comments:

Anonymous said...

Looks like the Park Board and the Park Improvement Committee worked out a good solution. Good job to all you hard working folks out there. Good to know someone has our back when it comes to safety in our parks. A job well done!

Steve Meyers said...

One of the reasons our roads are in such horrific disrepair and need an identified 36 million dollars of both short and long term repair is because of prior leadership not developing and following a consistent plan of budget revenue distribution and maintenance.

The intensive study done by engineering firm Black & Veatch that analyzed the aging and volatile sewer lines and sytem brought forward in several study sessions presented to the BOA exposed the long term and expensive implications of NOT addressing these glaring and failing infrastructure issues. And yes addressing these ongoing and increasing issues require
long term planning and CONSISTENT revenue distribution.

Allocating a mere 270k a year in the sanitary sewer annual budget towards innevatable failures within this aging system is normally spent within the 1st half of the budget year in EMERGENCY unplanned repairs (aka Pants on Fire).

Not following a consistent plan of identified projects is naive and you need to look no farther than the present road issues as a glaring reason to not kick the can down the road.I recommend to anyone that missed those presentations by Black & Veatch to archive those study sessions as to why a consistent funding schedule is a mandatory responsobility.


Steve Meyers

derek ward said...

Steve Meyers - I tend to agree that we need to stay focused on continually maintaining and improving our sewer system. I am concerned that I don't fully understand how much we expect to bring in over budgeted expenses (a) if we don't change the rates and (b) if we change the rates. I am probably inclined to support at least $1,000,000 in planned capital improvements per year. Obviously, we will have some unplanned capital jobs too.

But Greg has some good points. Specifically, we need to make sure that we aren't being over billed by the treatment agencies.

Greg Walters - Thank you so much for your leadership on the Parks Improvement initiative. I believe the committee made excellent progress and set us up to make further improvements over the next year or two. Also, I can't thank Dave Turner, Chris Rathbone and the rest of the Parks Board for their cooperation and participation. It is truly a community effort.

Derek Ward
Alderman, Ward 5

Anonymous said...

I swear the Mayor told me and some others he will not be running for re-election. Guess everyone will have an opinion on that! Maybe he is planning to run for the State Legislature. That would make three people in city government with that hidden agenda. It also might explain why the mayor has run up such a high dollar amount of unspent campaign funds in his campaign committee. I have to agree, the mayor does post a lot personal stuff on facebook. Most of it is way over the top. On the other hand, if you don't like it, don't read it.

Peter Weber said...

8:00 am -
You need to clean the potatoes out of your ears. Or maybe you're one of those people who has selective hearing. Anyway, the mayor started talking about running for re-election back in September, 2018.

Anonymous said...

"I swear the Mayor told me and some others he will not be running for re-election....Maybe he is planning to run for the State Legislature."

Time for a new face here, IOHO. On the other hand, there are several Aldermen that have exhibited, AS EXPECTED, nothing but initiative, spectacular productivity, civic experience and unsurpassed decorum and professionalism. Let's really get behind those people.

We've NEVER been more encouraged about the direction in which this City is headed because of these people.

CHANGE just takes time. And definitely one PERSONNEL CHANGE. Slim pickins' the last time around, as usual.

Peter Weber said...

9:42 -
Stop swearing and start paying attention! When the city had the last music in the park, there was a banner with the mayor's information announcing his re-election. He never hid that fact. If you are an example of the informed member of this community, then your ideas about some of the BOA members is totally worthless. You have no clue what is happening around you. Go back into your hole and leave the rest to the big kids.

Anonymous said...

Mr. Weber. You do not understand. The Mayor's comments were made AFTER his last election. He won the electin. He is there for four more years unless he runs for a state seat. This rumor or gossip may be nothing more than the rumor or gossip that Ryan Myers or Bonnaye Mims are eyeing state house seats that will be open next election in 2020. Term limits creates all sorts of opportunities for career politicians. I am not too impressed with the Mayor's tract record as Mayor of Raytown. Maybe he would do us better in jeff city.

Peter Weber said...

So what you're saying is that you are holding a guy's feet to the fire for something he said four years ago? Have you never changed your mind? Of course you have. You admit this may be a rumor or some gossip, so why are you spreading it? That makes you no better than the town troll.

Anonymous said...

"Maybe he would do us better in jeff city." If he was only moderately successful in being re-elected in Raytown this last time, what do you think his chances would actually be to achieve Jefferson City?

Peter Weber said...

He was "only moderately successful"? He won by 765 votes. Mike got 59.6% of the votes and the other guy got 39.9%. I'd call that very successful. Almost a mandate. The biggest mandate in the whole history of mandates!

Anonymous said...

Depends on your definition of "mandate" is, Petey. 765 votes? I don't think so.

Anonymous said...

I wonder what district mike lives in. Is the incumbent in that district termed out? The next election is in 2020. That's not very far away. It would be interesting to see what Mims and Myers are up. They live in Raytown state rep districts too.

Chris Inlow said...

Good job in making the parks safer for everyone to use!
-Chris Inlow

Anonymous said...


Tell me this? I thought Mims and Walter's were friends. I just saw the video of the last board meeting where Mims asked a question regarding the sewer ratings and Walter's posted that she was trying rush and change the rules to pass such.

If I remember well, she has been sitting on the board when this subject first came up and she asked extensive questions and share concerns about the sewer increase. So I suggest Walter's needs to talk to his "friend" for more details instead of throwing her under the bus.

Anonymous said...

"....why they are so interested in Mims and Myers? I think they both are doing excellent as Aldermen in Raytown. Hmmm, things started changes for the better..."

Yes, yes, YES!!! 2 ADDITIONAL Aldermen that are doing an awesome job.

Anonymous said...

Little Pete,

Consider the guy who ran against the mayor was not very well know the results were very bad for the mayor.

I heard many people now say they wouldn't have voted for the mayor and others saying they hope the state audit doesn't make them look bad for voting for the mayor.

Only time will tell, but like our last two mayors I have yet to see anything positive for Raytown from this administration.

Anonymous said...

I went back and checked the tape of the meeting too. Your recollection of the discussion is pretty much distorted. Especially the part about throwing someone under the bus. Walters asked a lot of questions of the City Administrator. He closed by saying there are many people in Raytown who cannot easily afford anymore tax increases. He pointed out the County has increased property tax valuations to historic levels and that people are being squeezed pretty hard for tax dollars.

Mims asked if it would be appropriate to suspend the regular rules and pass the tax increase right away. The City Attorney pointed out that first their has to be a public hearing, which I guess will be held at the next meeting for the public's input.

What I just shared is accurate. What you wrote was twisted to say the least. But I got the message as I am sure most who read these comments did. You don't like Greg Walters and will do all you can to get others to share you feelings.

Go sell your attempt at political back stabbing somewhere else. It does not work here.

Anonymous said...


"Mike got 59.6% of the votes and the other guy got 39.9%."

Raytown elections have historically low turnout. I agree that the other candidate got thumped.

Anonymous said...

Alderman Walters and Ward,

Thank you for looking out for the best interest of the citizens and business owners of Raytown.

I hope you both push back on the attempt to increase our sewer rates until more information can be provided to not only the citizens and business owners, but also the Board of Alderman.

It is truly concerning that their are those on the board who wanted to suspend the rules and just move forward with the increase.

When these attempts, occur I for one have even more questions!

However, I will let the two of you or other focus on why the push and what is not being shared or benefits may be for those pushing something faster than allowed by law.

My concerns come from conversations I have had with several individuals that have indicated there are many individuals and/or business behind in their sewer bills and still being provided serve.

Before those of us and I am sure the two of you subsidize sewer services for others shouldn't the starting place be those who are not current as it could be if they paid their bills there may not be a need to increase the rates at this time.

Here are some of my questions:

How many individuals and businesses are behind and what is the total dollar amount owned?

What is the largest dollar amount owned by a individual and business?

What is the greatest number of months owed by a individual and business?

What is the official policy and procedures and are they being followed?

Is it correct the only way to shut off sewer usage is to turn off the water supply?

If the only way to shut off sewer usage is the water supply are the water suppliers in Raytown complaint with the law?

Is it not true that the state did pass a law making water suppliers responsible and that the State Department of Natural Resources is the enforcement agency (DNR)?


Once again from conversations around town I doubt I am along with those questions nor am I alone in the fact they need answered and addressed before any increases are imposed and subsidized by honest individuals and businesses.

Anonymous said...

10:58

Those are some good questions and I hope all of our alderman get answers before forcing us to pay more.

I hope we really don't have several in the city that are allowed service without paying!

Anonymous said...

I pretty much know what my answer will be, but here is goes: Is the city going to re-stripe the streets and gravel streets before winter sets in? How about paving and streets? What is paving a street? Not the famous "chip and seal"!!

Anonymous said...


August 28, 2019 at 8:00 AM

Have you called PW and inquired?

Anonymous said...

12:20

I would call the city administrator or assistant city administrator and ask one of them about the streets.

I mean as a 4th class city that is hurting for money why do we need one let alone two.

I remember the "good old days" we had a mayor who not only like to be overly friendly as we do now, but actually managed the city.

God Bless those days and Willard Ross!

Anonymous said...

They only do repairs to respond to "him" and his facebook videos, which thankfully have slowed down.

Anonymous said...

@925
Agreed. The city spends half their time responding to him and backbitting. If they spent that much time and energy on the city perhaps we'd be in a better state. Instead they're trying to force every old person out of the home we've loved for 5 decades and paid for 30 years ago so some out of state investor can move a bunch of section 8 people.
When the couldn't do it with taxes they will try with sewer bills.

Anonymous said...


August 29, 2019 at 8:32 AM

It's not 1960!

We need professional city managers.

I don't want a retired carpenter or nurse running the city.

derek ward said...

@ August 27, 2019 at 10:58 AM

I sent your questions to city staff. If you don't mind, I'd like to understand your final two questions a bit better. Please feel free to call or email me directly.

Derek Ward
Alderman, Ward 5

Anonymous said...



August 29, 2019 at 8:32 AM

Governing these days is way too complicated.

We need a trained and educated staff who knows the ins and outs of dealing with the different entities such as the feds and the state.

Unfortunately the voters don't want to fund our city so we have to make due. That's working out really well. NOT!

Anonymous said...

I took the time to call Ms. Mims instead of guessing are reading rumors and talked to her. She said to me, "every since I was elected there's been nothing but negative comments about me, I just ignore them and have continued to move forward for the betterment of Raytown."

I gained nothing but respect for this lady, to continue to stand up to all of the mis-nomers. She was straight forward and responded to my questions. I like her insight into the negativity, her wealth of knowledge and experience. How about ya.

Now folks I hope this answers your questions about her intentions.