Sunday, May 10, 2020

MAY 19TH MEETING CHANGED FROM
OPEN MEETING TO ZOOM MEETING
In a prepared statement to the Board of Aldermen Mayor Michael McDonough wrote:

"Because we only have one item on the agenda with a public hearing, we will be holding the May 19th, 2020 meeting via Zoom, at 7:00 PM,  instead of a physical meeting. I think that waiting until June for a physical meeting will best serve the safety of the board and the staff at this time."

"Also, we will not have another BOA meeting until June 9th, 2020 because the June 2nd, 2020 meeting date is on an election date. There is one thing on the ballot for those in a small portion of our city to vote on.  The date was changed by the Governor from April 7th, 2020 to the June 2nd date due to concerns about the COVID19 virus." 

To view last Tuesday’s Board of Aldermen meeting use the following link. Item Number 2 covers the discussion for Mayor Pro Tem.
USE THIS LINK: MAYOR PRO TEM DISCUSSION

BY GREG WALTERS
Mayor Pro Tem Chosen
in Marathon Session
THIS MEETING WAS PACKED WITH DRAMA
Last Tuesday the Board of Aldermen held what should be their last public meeting via ZOOM. After spending about two hours on regular business the Board went into a marathon debate over the choosing of a new Mayor Pro Tem. The meeting finally ended at 11:00 pm.

Here is the short version of what happened . . .

Early in the meeting Alderman Bonnaye Mims asked to add a discussion item to the agenda. She told Board she wanted to discuss the Mayor Pro Tem. The Board agreed to her request and added the it as the last item on the evening’s agenda.

After two hours of taking care of the regular business Alderman Mims brought forth her discussion item. To everyone’s surprise, she ended the discussion by nominating herself for Mayor Pro Tem. (motion seconded by Alderman Ryan Myers.

A lengthy debate ensued. Many members on the Board objected to what they viewed as a subterfuge to sneak in her nomination when the vote had already been scheduled for the May 19, 2020 agenda.*

None the less, the Mayor approved her motion. He said he preferred to hold the Mayor Pro Tem election during a regular (open) public session. But that it was the Board’s decision.

Alderman Greg Walters made a motion to carry the item over to the next regular Board meeting scheduled for May 19th. Alderman Bill VanBuskirk pointed out the City Administrator had informed the Board via email the vote would be held at the second meeting in May. The vote on the motion was split 5 to 5. Despite the Mayor’s earlier statement that he preferred to hold the vote in a public setting he voted “NO”, against holding the item over until the May 19th meeting.

The Board then voted on Alderman Mims motion to make herself Mayor Pro Tem. The motion failed by a vote of five to five. Under Robert’s Rules of Order the Mayor is not allowed to break a tie on choosing Mayor Pro Tem.

Alderman Derek Ward then made a motion adjourn to the meeting. This made sense. Mims motion had already been discussed and voted on. The Mayor once again said it was up to the Board, and vote "NO" against adjournment.

The motion would have moved any additional votes f0r Mayor Pro Tem to the May 19th meeting. The roll was called. The motion tied 5 to 5. Once again, despite his stated belief the Board should hold the meeting in public session the Mayor voted “NO” against the motion to adjourn and move the election to the May 19th meeting.

A motion was then made to nominate Alderman Derek Ward for the position of Mayor Pro Tem. Alderman Ward declined the nomination.

A motion was then made to nominate Alderman M.J. VanBuskirk as Mayor Pro Tem. Alderman Bill VanBuskirk told the Board he would recuse himself from the vote since it could be perceived as a conflict of interest.

That motion failed as well.

Finally, Alderman Jim Aziere made a motion to nominate Ryan Myers for the position of Mayor Pro Tem. That motion passed by a vote of 6 yes to 4 no.

The meeting was adjourned.

*City Administrator Damon Hodges had previously confirmed by email that the Mayor Pro Tem election was scheduled for May 19th. The May 19th meeting will be held at City Hall and open is open to the public. The meeting begins at 7:00 pm.

BY PAUL LIVIUS
COMMENTARY . . .
Let’s Set
the Record Straight
Last Tuesday’s meeting was a wild one. Everyone can watch it via the link at the top of the page and draw their own conclusions from what was said.

The Mayor made a very misleading comment during the debate. Alderman VanBuskirk had called the motion by Miss Mims to nominate herself out of order. It was to say the least . . . sneaky. In the conversation that followed the Mayor said the following.

“This is not out of order. There have been tons of motions like this with votes on them after the motion was made.”

The use of the phrase “tons of motions” is misleading. A ton is a customary unit of weight, equal to 907 kg/2,000 lb. 

I did some checking. Board members rarely bring motions to  the table on their own. In the last year there have been only five such motions made. Those legislative motions are:

RYAN MYERS
  • Creation of Licensing and Taxing fees on owners of rental property. These fees are currently being implemented by the City.
GREG WALTERS
  • Creation of a Parks Improvement Committee: The end result of this discussion item was to institute nightly patrols of city parks to stop curfew violations.
  • Language Change to Zoning Application Procedure: This would change the notification procedure required to be sent to property owners when surrounding property is up for rezoning. It has been sent to the Planning and Zoning Commission for review.
  • Elimination of the Late Fee on Sanitary Sewer Billings.This item was approved by the Board and is currently in effect for a one month period. 
BONNAYE MIMS
  • Creation of an Ethics and Conduct Code: This item is pending review by the Board of Aldermen after suggested revisions by the City Attorney.
  • Discussion on Mayor Pro Tem: The Board approved Mims request for a discussion. However, a discussion is not an election. The Board voted down her attempt to nominate herself.
I am not sure what the Mayor means by a “ton” of such motions. But I do not think that five motions in one year equals a ton.

The Mayor’s comments suggest that what Mims did is common practice.

It is not.

Both Ryan Myers and Greg Walters have brought items to the table on their own. Each of them have done their due diligence and provided information to Board members before making their presentation to the Board. Both Aldermen scheduled these discussion items on the agenda with proper notice to the City Clerk.

Crime and Police
Activity Overview
  • There was one sex crime reported this week. A juvenile girl received an unsolicited, sexually explicit video over social media from an adult male who was in her “friends” list. The investigation is ongoing.
  • On April 27th, at approx. 3:50 pm, a group of teenagers fought each other in the street in the 9000 block of 67th St. One of the participants wore brass knuckles to strike the victim. No serious injuries were reported.
  • On April 27th, at approx. 10:30 pm, a resident of an apartment in the 9800 block of 60th St accidentally fired a shot into the apartment below, which was occupied. No one was injured, but officers determined that the gun had been reported stolen and an arrest was made.
  •  On April 30th, at approx. 4:30 pm, an adult female was shot at a residence in the 7900 block of Evanston by someone she knows. She was transported to the hospital with serious injuries but is expected to survive. A suspect has been identified and the investigation is ongoing.
  •  On May 2nd, at approx. 2:45, officers were called to an apartment in the 8600 block of Utopia Dr regarding a stabbing. A woman reported that someone she knew had stabbed her in the hand but refused to identify the person or cooperate with the investigation. The injury required several stitches and the victim signed a prosecution waiver.
On May 2nd, at approx. 6:45 pm, officers were called to the intersection of 55th & Blue Ridge Cutoff. A woman reported that her boyfriend struck her several times with his fists and attempted to run her over with a car. She was not injured, and the suspect was arrested at the scene.

To leave a comment use this link

7 comments:

Anonymous said...

I watch the meetings of the Board of Aldemen on a pretty regular basis. I know from reading here that Mary Jane Van Buskirk and Derek Ward. Both of them offered to serve as Mayor Pro Tem. I think it is a good idea to move the position around. Apparently enough on the Board want to keep it part of what is beginning to look like an exclusive club at city hall. Both of those aldermen would have been a welcome change at city hall. Seems the other side still has enough power to block people that are not part of their clique. If they would put more effort into working together the would accomplish a lot more.

Anonymous said...

"Mayor Pro Tem. I think it is a good idea to move the position around. Apparently enough on the Board want to keep it part of what is beginning to look like an exclusive club at city hall."

I get what you're saying and I'm either/or when it comes to the newly-elected, but their selection was far more preferable to an embarassing, time-wasting, capricious, poorly-executed attempt at a gimme grab squeeze play, IMHO.

Anonymous said...

Agreed. It appears good old boy government is back in Raytown. Council looks to be split down the middle. Idiotic rants by some members are an embarrassment to our city.

Steve Meyers said...

Alderman Ward turned down the nomination as did Alderman Hunt this time aound. Only possible future challenge with passing the Mayor Pro Tem baton to Alderman Ryan Myers is this. If he is elected to the State Senate seat he is running for he will leave the Board in January. Instant replay for a very short temp replacement fill in Mayor Pro Tem till April. Say it isn't so! Again...I've been critical of this ridiculous nomination process and refused to participate and play the games back in 2018. Please someone STEP UP on the Council and formulate a nomination format with defined professional procedures that remove all this petty and embarassing side show antics that truthfully have horrible optics and leave citizens shaking their head in dissapointment.

Anonymous said...

Some very good points Steve. The truth is some members of the Board (in fact, five of them) voted to carry over the vote on Mayor Pro Tem. Not once, but twice.

Alderman Greg Walters made a motion to carry over the vote until the next meeting. The vote was five to five. The Mayor broke the tie by voting to hold the vote than night. Later in the meeting Alderman Derek Ward made a motion to adjourn the meeting after Alderman Bonnaye Mims could not muster enough votes to win election as Mayor Pro Tem. Like before, the Mayor voted against the motion to move the election to the next Board meeting.

The Mayor repeatedly said it was not his decision. He told anyone watching of his wish to hold the vote in public session. When he had a chance to vote to carry those votes over, he said "NO".

Steve, you paint with a very broad brush. The Mayor caused the confusion at the last meeting. Watch the meeting with a clear eye and you will see the answer to the pettiness, lack of professionalism, and embarrassing side show at city hall.

Betty Kelly said...

9:22 you said "The Mayor repeatedly said it was not his decision. He told anyone watching of his wish to hold the vote in public session." This was held in public session, not closed session. Just because you can't muster enough votes to do what you want, don't blame the mayor for doing what he does. It's called politics, and if you can't stand it, get out of the kitchen.

Anonymous said...

I watched the meeting too. The Mayor made it very clear he wanted the election to be held at a meeting the public could attend the meeting. He also voted twice to keep the election from being held over until the public could be prsent.

The city administrator had sent the Board an email telling them the election would be held at city hall once the city council quit holding zoom meetings.

Anyone can check this out by watching he video of the May 5th meeting of the city council. To view the meeting go to www.raytown.mo.us Part 2 of the meeting. You will find it very interesting.