Monday, September 10, 2018

Please join us in welcoming a new member to the Electronic Media serving the Raytown area. 

Nexus Raytown has joined the growing number of web based news outlets serving Raytown. Nexus Raytown is published by Cave Spring Park Association. The Association is publishing this electronic newspaper as a "thank you" to the Raytown Community that has supported the park for the last 42 years. 

To visit Raytown’s newest member of its website family use the following link.

nexus raytown

BY GREG WALTERS
Should Raytown
be Audited?

Tony Jacob is a young man who actively campaigned in the August 7th Election in which three tax proposals from City Hall were soundly rejected by Raytown voters.*

He campaigned the old-fashioned way. Slowly going door to door, he visited with thousands of homeowners in Raytown.

And he listened.

He found out many of the people he visited with shared his concern that City Hall was not really functioning well.

Tony told us, “Many residents are concerned with how money has been spent and where it is all going. Many are concerned with the policies and procedures for good governance not being followed.”

So he went to work. He asked for detailed information from the city through the Missouri Sunshine Law and through the Freedom of Information Act.

He also found the answers and possibly the solutions to Raytown City Hall problems can be found with the help of the Missouri State Auditor’s Department.

The Missouri State Auditor's office performs audits of governmental agencies in the State of Missouri. It is currently conducting 68 audits in Missouri.

The Auditor may conduct an audit upon request by the voters or upon the Governor's request.

It has been over 38 years since the City of Raytown has been audited by the State of Missouri. That particular audit was made through a request by Raytown voters in the early 1980’s. The petition effort was led by John Colt, who, at the time of the audit, was the owner/publisher of the Raytown Post.

Mr. Jacob said, To instill confidence in our local governance and to bolster the City of Raytown’s reputation it is necessary and time for a full Audit according to GAO principals and best practices.”

Those interested in signing the audit petition or learning more about the petition drive can contact Tony Jacob via the following website www.auditraytown.com

Or . . . Stop by Doughboy’s Doughnuts located at 63rd and Woodson to pickup petition forms or to sign a petition (11559 East 63rd Street, Raytown, MO 64133).

*ALL THREE TAXES WERE DEFEATED BY LOPSIDED MARGINS. THE LARGEST BEING THE INTERNET TAX WHICH FELL 70% (no) to 30% (yes)

CLICK ON AD TO MAKE LARGER
The Raytown Kiwanis Club's
2018 Annual Pumpkins on Parade!
For some good family fun bring all of those special to you to the 9th  annual Pumpkins on Parade held at Cave Spring Park.






BY PAUL LIVIUS
The Paul Livius Report
Raytown Board of Aldermen Meeting
September 4, 2018
The Board certified the election results for the special election held on August 7, 2018.
The Board passed an ordinance rescinding the voluntary tax rate ceiling reduction taken in the year 2012 to be applied to future years. The City of Raytown can undo past voluntary reductions that were taken in any even numbered year in 2008 and going forward, in which the reduced rate has followed them forward. In this case both the General Revenue and Parks and Recreation levies can have their voluntary reductions undone. Once this is approved, the Missouri State Tax Auditor’s Office will revert the ceiling back to what it would have been, had no voluntary reductions been taken.

The Board heard the first reading and voted to have a second reading of an ordinance granting a conditional use permit subject to certain conditions to allow a vehicle/equipment rental establishment at 6301 Raytown Road. The Board then voted to deny the application.  David Housh is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit for vehicle/equipment rentals. 6301 Raytown Road is zoned neighborhood commercial, which does not allow vehicle/equipment rentals. Therefore, a Conditional Use Permit is required to have this land use at this property. The application first went to the Planning & Zoning Commission in April, where city staff recommended denial. The case was continued to the May meeting. The applicant revised his application and stated he would need to obtain the property owner’s approval before accepting the city’s recommendations. The case was then continued to the June meeting that was cancelled due to the applicant’s inability to obtain said approval. City staff attempted to contact Mr. Housh several times before the July meeting to determine whether or not to place him on the July 12, 2018 Planning & Zoning Commission agenda. Mr. Housh did not respond.

The Board heard the first reading and voted to have a second reading of an ordinanceapproving the 2018 zoning map amendment.  The Board then passed the ordinance.  After years of consistently releasing an updated zoning map throughout the 2000’s, and after careful considerations, city staff saw the need to update and amend the zoning map. The online version of the zoning map (GIS), which can be found on the city’s website, has been more recently updated but still has a few inaccuracies. The proposed zoning map update uses the online zoning map as a base and changes the zoning of several properties that were found to be inaccurate by City Staff. City Staff found that there were few inaccuracies; that some properties have been rezoned through ordinances that have yet to be updated. The Staff Report includes detailed information about each property that is proposed to be changed.

The Board heard the first reading and voted to have a second reading of an ordinanceapproving the final plat of Crescent Creek. The Board then passed the ordinance. Judd Claussen P.E., Phelps Engineering, Inc., is requesting approval of a final plat for Crescent Creek, Second Plat. Mr. Claussen is working on behalf of Kirk Miles with Crescent Creek Revitalization LLC, to consolidate the existing eleven lots into eight lots to allow for the construction of larger single-family homes as opposed to the townhomes originally envisioned for the site. In the original plat of Crescent Creek in 2003, a private, ‘L’-shaped drive was planned to connect 57th Street and Crescent Avenue. However, in this replat, the private drive in now planned to connect 57th Street and 57th Terrace.

The Board passed a resolution authorizing the expenditure of funds with key equipment for the purchase of parts and repairs related to the maintenance and operation of city-owned equipment in an amount not to exceed $26,000.  The City of Raytown recently entered into an agreement to purchase an Elgin street sweeper from Key Equipment and a PO for $250,000.00 has been subsequently issued; additionally, the City has incurred $7,143.35 in expenses since the beginning of FY 2018. The staff anticipates the need for replacement parts for the CCTV camera and certain consumables for the Vactor sewer truck that are only available from Key Equipment. The staff has identified an immediate need for the replacement of the cabling for the CCTV camera system in an amount of an additional $7,044.

The Board passed a resolution approving the expenditure of funds with Double Check Company for maintenance and operation of the city-owned underground storage tanks and fueling equipment in excess of $15,000.The City of Raytown recently entered into an agreement to purchase a replacement underground storage tank and dispenser system from Double Check and a PO for $353,000 has been subsequently issued; additionally, the City has incurred $1,792.90 in expenses since the beginning of FY 2018. The staff has identified the immediate need to replace the tank monitor for the underground storage tank at City Hall in an amount of $7,503.00 with the possibility of additional needs for repairs to other sites and general maintenance supplies that require additional purchasing authority per purchasing policy. The tank monitor is considered an immediate need to meet our MO Dept. of Natural Resources and tank insurance requirements.

The Board passed a resolution authorizing the repair services of wastewater and storm water infrastructure.  During routine CCTV work, the condition of these pipes was determined to have extensive longitudinal and radial cracking with considerable crush and loss of pieces of pipe in places. The condition of these segments is such that it requires complete replacement. The general conditions in these areas pushed these projects toward pipe bursting due to substantial amounts of buildings and other improvements that would interfere with open cut. Each of these projects will still need to excavate to replace each manhole & each private sewer service connection.
The city received 3 construction estimates from Wiedenmann, Inc. based off of the Lee’s Summit Cooperative contract.
·        Wiedenmann estimated cost of 6720 to 6808 Raytown Road to be $60,360.00 + 10% ($6,036.00) = $66,396.00
·        Wiedenmann estimated cost of 8923 to 9007 E. 79th Street to be $59,931.00 + 10% ($5,993.10) = $65,924.10
·        Wiedenmann estimated cost of 9805 E. 350 Highway to be $20,300.00 + 10% ($2,030.00) = $22,330.00.

This is from a utility company bore that went through the City main, but the staff is not able to figure out which company made the hole years ago. These 3 sanitary sewer repair projects total $154,650.10. This includes $14,059.10 of contingency money to cover unforeseen circumstances that may arise with this work.

There was a Board discussion about the 2018-2019 budget.  To watch the discussion, go to

https://raytownmo.swagit.com/play/09042018-1737 It is the last item on the meeting index.

30 comments:

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...

"Granted, the present mayor needs to not listen to the Chief of Police so much. I know they are friends and that the Chief was in charge back then, but this is a new time and the Mayor does not have to listen to him anymore."

12:44 PM, you made several good points, but we don't believe that it's possible to uncouple the aforementioned gruesome twosome. After all these years, they're too intertwined to act independently - this has been openly demonstrated more than once.






Anonymous said...

"How can a career LEO just suddenly put all that behind him?? Not possible."

Agreed.

"Anyway, I like the guy as a "figurehead", but he is clearly out of his element as a city administrator."

He obviously enjoys attending every event and public outing. I cannot find any fault in that. But I also agree that while he may have been a good city employee that was steadily employed for a number of years, the best "fit", given our current circumstances, would be a business owner, academician or someone similarly situated that has the education, experience and aptitude to handle complex issues.

Anonymous said...

What good would an audit do? What the city/PD does may be unethical, but that doesn't make it illegal.

Anonymous said...

I wonder if the mayor ever thinks about how his buddy Jim Lynch has and is using him. From everything I have seen and heard I don't think the mayor is smart to figure that out.. Yes he is being used and has been .

Anonymous said...

Yeah because so many of the prior mayors have done a good job. Apparently you don’t understand how the powers are distributed. The only time the mayor even has a vote is when their is a tie by the board. Has no city administrator duties, which personally, is a waste of money paying an actual city administrator for a city this small.

Anonymous said...

You can say what you want about the present board members and the mayor, but lets look at the whole picture.
First of all, remember when Sue Frank was Mayor and the WalMart / School District giveaway was created. It was almost done, but not voted on until 2007 when David Bower became Mayor. It was voted on without a complete contract being presented to the Board who had been in power for years. Remember that out of the $40 million dollar TIF, the School District got over $30 million of it leaving the City of Raytown to foot the bill for the 23 year TIF which is ballooning out of control. And your present Board has been trying to "make ends meet" due to this debacle that went on years ago. That is why Raytown is in such a mess. It is not because of the current Board. In 2013, several new members were elected as the present ones thought they were shoe-ins and did not campaign and were surprised that people did not want them anymore. In 2015, more new members came on the Board and worked together to try and make things right for the citizens of Raytown. Don't blame them, they got so much dumped in their laps to try and straighten out. They are doing their best with what they have to work with.
As for the Mayor, he is present at all functions this City and other functions throughout the metropolitan area. He is a great face for the City of Raytown. Mayor Boyer was never (oh maybe, when it was politically in his interest) in attendance at Raytown functions. However, he and others on previous boards are certainly working behind the scenes now to create disention. Granted, the present mayor needs to not listen to the Chief of Police so much. I know they are friends and that the Chief was in charge back then, but this is a new time and the Mayor does not have to listen to him anymore.

Raytown Newbie said...

As a relative newcomer, I don't know all the "Walmart" history first hand. The blogger above says quite nicely what I believe the state of things to be. The past few months leading up to the election has seen a ramped up level of nasty criticism of the current BOA. I do not believe their handling of CURRENT budgetary matters has been so bad.

I did not vote for the mayor. I saw the potential for a conflict of interest that probably only comes naturally to him. How can a career LEO just suddenly put all that behind him?? Not possible. Anyway, I like the guy as a "figurehead", but he is clearly out of his element as a city administrator.

Have a nice week Raytowners.

Anonymous said...

"You can say what you want about the present board members and the mayor, but lets look at the whole picture...And your present Board has been trying to "make ends meet" due to this debacle that went on years ago. That is why Raytown is in such a mess. It is not because of the current Board...The only time the mayor even has a vote is when their is a tie by the board... "

Basic. Everyone gets this. We GET it. Always have. How many more times does this need to be asserted? Those remarks appear to be merely purposeful deflection at this point.

Some concern lies with how a handful of current elected officials CONDUCT THEMSELVES. THIS MATTERS. It's all too obvious that those in question very carefully read this blog, are all too aware of the complaints and have sublimated their more overt public behavior. (For no other reason than to survive the next election cycle, more than likely.) Their remarks and behavior will continue to be stringently reviewed, as their prior hijinks have consistently detracted from issues at hand.

"Apparently you don’t understand how the powers are distributed. The only time the mayor even has a vote is when their is a tie by the board."

Well no kidding. ONCE AGAIN, We get it. A mayoral potted plant could pretty much get our business handled. At vote we could add a touch of serendipity by simply flipping a coin to break any tie. This would perhaps be preferable to the sitting dog and pony act.

A well-tended phildendrion would perhaps be preferable to officeholders that may/may not have attempted to enrich their employee spouse, or one that may have consorted in a bar/bars with a certain caustic online "admin". Examples abound.

Professional behavior. Professional government. Impulse control.

Anonymous said...

I am not sure I agree with those comments. Certainly only has a vote in case of ties. But the way business is being conducted at City Hall does not fit your criteria of Professsional Behavior or Professional Government.

Let's review. The needless foot dragging on filling vacancies on the city council took over six months in one case. It was a show worthy of the carnival. The Mayor put a candidate up that he simply did not have the votes to support.Then his minions went into a frothing fit over the insensitive City Council!

One of the first requirements for any elected office is that you need to know how to count.

The city has been without a qualified and licensed city administrator. (yes, the do have certain professional criteria they are supposed to meet). The cobbled together "joint" city administrator roles being played out at city hall will not move Raytown forward.

City ordinances specifically require the City Administrator to hold certification in his or her field. Neither of the two aforementioned do not. Check it out. The city ordinances are very clear on this point.

Same is true for the position of Finance Director. There are degrees a person in this position is supposed to have to professionally conduct the city's business.

The last two people holding the positions of City Administrator and City Finance Director were literally run out of their jobs by a hostile work environment allowed at City Hall. Every one of the City Council knows this. Some even participated in creating the situation.

The Mayor does attend many city functions. But there is a BIG difference between glad handing at social events and taking an active role in the metropolitan area. It would be fair to say his name identification is one of the lowest for a Mayor in the metropolitan area.

What bothers me the most are the broad announcements from the Mayor in which he proclaims the debt situation in the 350 Live (Walmart) area will be solved by re-financing the bonds.

Anyone who pays attention to the markets knows that is not going to happen. Interest rates have risen. That window was opened. It is now closed. You know why the city could not move on he re-financing of bonds? Quite simple, while shopping the market for buyers the city foolishly entered into a lawsuit with the Fire Department. No one is too interested in financing a city that is literally at war with itself.

By the way. The lawsuit was eventually settled. By any measuring stick, the Fire Department won that battle. They no longer have to pay any of their tax revenue to pay for the folly known as 350 Live.

Many poor decisions, non-decisions are not the hallmark of a successful administration. To try and paint it as a glowing accomplishment is very wrong.

Anonymous said...

So many holes in the comments made by 7:04 AM that one could swear it was authored at Blue Steel firing range. Slow City Hall news cycle presently so this should get the bored bloggers stirred up. Maybe it was internally generated? It was worthy of some much needed comic relief though!

Anonymous said...

Need I remind everyone that the Fire District first got alarmed that there were issues with the TIF revenues when the Bower and Mahesh Sharma lead Administration failed to file the State required reports for several years. These serious violations occurred long before most of the current Mayor and Board were elected. And that horrible TIF project and agreement continues to haunt and harm Raytown. But yea let’s hang it on the current administration as they attempt to dig out from all the ongoing shrapnel from it.

Anonymous said...

So many of you complain so much on this blog. Have you ever ran for a board seat? Do you serve on any committee? I am sure that the answer to both of these would be no to most of you. The Board has had much dumped in their laps that they are earnestly trying to clean up. It is a thankless job and no matter what they do, they are taken to task by those that are either unwilling to help or just love trying to make waves. I support their work and wish them the very best with what they have to deal with.

Anonymous said...

When David Boyer was Mayor, he very rarely, if ever, brought anyone's name forward for a committee seat. There were countless vacanies on committees when he left office. At least our present Mayor has brought forward many names to fill many vacant seats on committees. Check your history.

Anonymous said...

"When David Boyer was Mayor, he very rarely, if ever, brought anyone's name forward for a committee....At least our present Mayor has brought forward many names to fill many vacant seats on committees..."

Brilliant analysis, top drawer. Please provide a comprehensive list of the number and duration of unfilled appointments during Mr. BOWER'S (B-O-W-E-R) tenure. Thank you.

Anonymous said...

Looks like its happening EMS is going to be taken over by KC Fire. That means all Raytown EMS workers are out of a job it also means longer response times for Raytown residents.I wonder is this because taxes didn't pass and this is the best/easiest way to save money?

Anonymous said...

Seems as though the City Administrator position got created when a former mayor could not perform the full time duties that a mayor was required to do many years ago because they had full time job commitments before being elected to office that conflicted with it. If the elected mayor is available, he or she should perform those duties again.

Anonymous said...

What’s your source for this information?

Anonymous said...

The City has to operate with the funds that the taxpayers provide. This means finding new ways of providing the same services and fixing infrastructure with flat or low revenue increases. No one should be surprised by outsourcing, consolidations and other strategies to keep the City operating. Hopefully, whatever EMS service we get will not create delays in response times.

Anonymous said...

You couldn’t have gotten this more wrong if you tried. Raytown EMS has been sinking ship for the past 10 years and the time has come to make a change. The City is going to transfer the license to the Raytown Fire District, you know the one that was in the news two months ago after being recognized as one of the best in the whole state. Response times will decrease, the revolving door of employees will stop, the poor and down right horrible care that has been explained in detail on this blog will cease and we will finally get the service we deserve. Get your facts straight before you speak please

Unknown said...

"Get the facts straight before you speak" looks like you just confirmed what I said. Fire is taking over EMS, Employees will be out of a job.As far as response times Our EMS comes from this city response times on an emergency is under 6 min. What kind of response time do you think your going to get when an ambulance is coming from a further distance?

Anonymous said...

After rereading your comment I noticed you said Raytown fire. So we do differ there. My source said KC Fire, and it's pretty reliable however I'm not saying your wrong. I guess we will just have to wait and see.

Anonymous said...

I would hate to think of the current mayor taking over the responsibilities of city administrator the man can't even read a budget. I have no respect for him, he lost that when he threw the current board under the bus over cutting the police budget. He was sticking with the police over getting a balance budget. Shame,shame on you. As for the EMS the trouble started with Matt Cushamn playing with the time cards just as Lynch has done.

Anonymous said...

The only people I have noticed that don’t want a state audit are directly tied to the city or speak with those from the city too much.

If we are to ever get to the truth we will have to have the state audit.

For those that still don’t understand playing with time cards is illegal and the audit will allow the county and state to prosecute those who have done this act against the taxpayers of Raytown.

Anonymous said...

Kcfd and Rfpd are the same thing basically because KC dispatches. So if you think the ambulances will be better, you’re kidding yourself. No guarantees it will be a Raytown ambulance and that it will be anywhere close to Raytown when dispatched. This city is dying, whether you all want to see it or not. I guess you will get what your willing to pay for.

Anonymous said...

Set emotion aside for a minute. I’ve been saying this all along before the tax vote, “you get what you pay for”. Simple. No new taxes, okay. City operations don’t stop and they must live within their budget. That means painful cuts sometimes, as we saw last year and now this year. We’ll have to wait and see what service level change we will see, good or bad.

Anonymous said...


The city has no money. Getting rid of EMS is a necessary evil apparently.

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...

no guarantees you will get a raytown ambulance tonight as they only have one..

Anonymous said...

That is not the case. Not tied to the city, and don't run around with city officials. Don't need a audit. There is always someone screaming for one, over the past 50 years at least 30 or more times it has been called for. Stop wasting taxpayers money on witch hunts!