Saturday, October 27, 2018

REMINDER TO OUR READERS
 TWO EVENTS TO WATCH FOR THIS WEEK

ENJOY THE FALL COLORS
HALLOWEEN IS WEDNESDAY

To leave a comment use this link
BY GREG WALTERS
A Taxing Question
OUR RESPONSE TO AN
ANONYMOUS BLOGGER 
About once a week we receive a post from an anonymous blogger who makes it their business to complain bitterly about the what they call an "anti-tax attitude" in Raytown. In his last missive he wrote:
*      Anonymous said . . .
“You all crack me up! Your anti-tax attitude is killing this this city but you all don’t see it. You can’t pay bills in 2018 and beyond based on 80’s and 90’s tax rates. So what are you going to do when the city can no longer pay their bills? Because that time is coming based on the current economic situation.”
We wondered if the post was, in a word, accurate. So we did some fact checking on revenue resources for the City of Raytown. What we found will probably surprise most of our readers.
Nearly all of Raytown’s taxes are tied to inflation.
The following is a short list of Raytown’s major income producing taxes. All of these taxes are based on the dollar amount spent on the product that is taxed. As the cost of the product  goes up, so does the amount of tax paid.
FRANCHISE TAXES
Natural Gas       Based on dollar amount (tied to inflation)
Electricity           Based on dollar amount (tied to inflation)
Telephone          Based on dollar amount (tied to inflation)
Cell Phone         Based on dollar amount (tied to inflation)
Internet               Based on dollar amount (tied to inflation)

SALES TAXES
All sales taxes    Based on dollar amount (tied to inflation)

PROPERTY TAXES (personal and real estate)
Property tax valuations are reviewed by Jackson County every two years. The property value is tied to inflation.

The only tax we were able to find not tied to inflation is the gasoline tax. It is based on a per gallon basis.

Based on the facts above, someone is trying to sell a false narrative. The fact is nearly all of Raytown's taxes are based on dollar amount sold. That means the taxes are keeping right in step with inflation.


Election Endorsements . . .
The November 6th General Election will be upon us in a little over ten days. Depending on your point of view, this election will be a pivotal one for our nation and Missouri. Here is a list of our choices in a few of those races and issues. Please remember to vote.

FOR STATE REPRESENTATIVE – DISTRICT 28
Jerome Barnes

FOR UNITED STATES SENATE
Josh Hawley

There are four Amendments and four Propositions on the state wide ballot. We have separated three of those issues, all having to do with the legalization of marijuana for medicinal use. The marijuana issues follow the other ballot questions. 
Amendment 1 . . . . VOTE NO
LEGISLATIVE DISTRICT LINES
The Legislative and Senatorial Districts in Missouri are re-drawn every ten years to guarantee each District is balanced as to population. In many states the re-drawing of District lines is often mired in legal challenges and accusations of gerrymandering and favoritism.

That may be true in other states. But it is not so in Missouri. The current system used in Missouri to draw District lines is fair and balanced.

Someone once said, “If it is not broken, do not try to fix it”.

Good advice. Vote no on Amendment 1. 
Amendment 4 . . . . VOTE YES
CHANGES TO BINGO LICENSING 
Amendment 4 would allow a few minor changes to the rules governing the operation of Bingo Parlors in Missouri. Two changes are suggested here. 
  • Remove language limiting bingo game advertising that a court ruled unenforceable.
  • Allow a member of a licensed organization conducting bingo games to participate in the management of bingo games after being a member of the organization for six months instead of the current two years.
These minor changes will open up the operation of what many people view as a social and  recreational activity. In its own way, allowing advertising of such operations may help boost the local economy in some areas. 
Proposition B . . . . VOTE YES
MINIMUM WAGE 
Proposition B sets minimum wage standards through 2023. The current minimum wage would be set at $8.60 per hour with .85 cents per hour each year until capped at $12 per hour in 2023.

The schedule of increases follows:
  • $8.60 per hour beginning January 1, 2019
  • $9.45 per hour beginning January 1, 2020
  • $10.30 per hour beginning January 1, 2021
  • $11.15 per hour beginning January 1, 2022
  • $12.00 per hour beginning January 1, 2023
Proposition D . . . . VOTE NO
GASOLINE TAX
Proposition D would raise the tax incrementally through 2022 to a total of .27 cents per gallon. The current gasoline tax in Missouri is .17 cents per gallon.

The schedule of increases follows:

  • Nineteen and one-half (19.5) cents per gallon beginning July 1, 2019;
  • Twenty-two (22) cents per gallon beginning July 1, 2020;
  • Twenty-four and one-half (24.5) cents per gallon beginning July 1, 2021;
  • Twenty-seven (27) cents per gallon beginning July 1, 2022.
Everyone wants to improve our highways and bridges in Missouri. But these hefty tax increases will put too heavy a burden on Missouri motorists

A “no” vote is in order on Proposition D.
MEDICINAL MARIJUANA VOTE NO 
AMENDMENT 2 AND 3 / PROPOSITION C 
The legalization of medicinal marijuana is an emotional issue. We are well aware of people who use marijuana to help ease suffering due to a number of ailments.

But what is being proposed in Amendments 2 and 3, and in Proposition C is about more than allowing the sale of marijuana for medicinal purposes to the public.

It is the legitimization of setting up an industry that only has one direction to go. And that direction is the legalization of the recreational use of marijuana.

In our research we came across an article in which Greene County Sheriff Jim Arnott wrote: “I am going to wait to see if the law passes before making any considerations regarding what to do."
Arnott said he was alarmed by what he had heard from a colleague in Colorado, where the legalization of medicinal marijuana was enacted nearly two decades ago and where recreational cannabis was approved in 2012.
"I definitely have concerns over the entire marijuana issue," he said in an email. "I have had the pleasure of listening and conversing with a Sheriff from Colorado over what has happened to his County after the laws progressed from medical to growing etc. The Sheriff stated it destroyed the county and overburdened their criminal justice system with a whole host of issues. I am just waiting as is everyone to see what transpires in November."
The three proposals before the voters have one thing in common. If passed, each proposal is opening of the door to what is estimated to be a 10 million dollar industry in Missouri.

One wonders why, if the purpose is to treat marijuana as a drug, why not distribute it the way other controlled drugs are in Missouri . . . through a licensed pharmacy?

For example, cocaine is a controlled substance. It is used in some medical procedures. But it has not been necessary to set up the convoluted structure and bureaucratic machinery to distribute it (cocaine) outside the norms of regular pharmaceutical distribution.

We support the use of any kind of therapy that helps ease the pain of people suffering from chronic illnesses.

But what has been laid out by petitioners is a thinly disguised attempt to set the groundwork for the legalization of marijuana for recreational use. For instance, Proposition C calls for the legalization of home grown marijuana. We have yet to find anyone who can say how homegrown weed has any medicinal value.

All three of the proposals are flawed. Our Legislators and Senators in Jefferson City can do much better. The only way to receive better results is to let our representatives know they must try again.


To leave a comment use this link

23 comments:

Anonymous said...

Last week there was a false narrative here about fees for ice cream socials. A few weeks ago there was a false narrative here about a gasoline price war in Raytown. Let’s ignore these things shall we? If a tax takes in less revenue than the previous year then the revenue is not keeping up with inflation. We know this is occurring with many of our taxes. Property tax revenue is a classic example. I think this needed to be explained.

Anonymous said...

I don't remembver any narrative about a gasoline price war in Raytown. I remember one being mentioned on 40 Highway and Sterling just north of Raytown. Just take Sterling past the homeless village under the I-70 bridge and you will find where the gas war was. As for the ice cream social, I went back and looked. There is nothing on the page about an ice cream social. The only false narrative is your post.

Anonymous said...

The ice cream = last weeks edition. You didn’t look very hard.

Anonymous said...

Finally, someone recognizes we are being taxed to death. Between the city and the school district it is really getting hard to keep up with the tax increases we pay every time a utility bill goes up, the county re-assess the value of my property, and now the ridiculously high fees for the simplest of services from city hall. Hasn't city hall figured it out yet? If I wanted to pay higher taxes I can move to that city to do so.

Anonymous said...

2:17 pm

I am going to ask a serious question after I give some facts. The school district is the biggest part of our tax bill. The City, not so much. But, I think we can all agree that we are the second highest City in the metro for taxes. Ok. So with these agreed upon facts, perhaps we can all agree on this: We are residential heavy and business lite. We are landlocked. To give you an example... North Kansas City has a population of 4,500 people. On 5 square miles. They are business heavy and residential lite. They have a ton of money for their City. Our City was poorly planned and we are way behind on business development. We have 15.5% of our population that is at the poverty level. The economy of Raytown is out of wack, unbalanced and not diversified. I keep saying this, but it falls on deaf ears with some folks. It will be a struggle to run this City for years to come. It’s easy to blame other people, but a lot of folks are not connecting the dots! It would save a lot of time if all factions in this City would realize the truth of what I just said! As a famous political hack once said, it’s the economy stupid! So when do we stop blaming and playing political games and start working together to improve the situation? Because we can change everybody that is in office right now and the problem I outlined is still there. M.

Anonymous said...

You missed a very important part in your analysis. It is the part where the city is $30 million dollars in debt on a failed 350 Live TIF District. It was a bad deal for the city. After ten years of millions in payments, the city is still $30 million dollars in debt. At the same time, the city is GIVING Walmart an HYVEE FREE use of the city's police department equipment (SUV police cruisers and the fuel used to run them). The city is even allowing officers on private duty service to those stores to take them home city owned vehicles with them when they are off duty.

The city is now trying to re-finance the bond indebtedness. But it is hard to tell what is going on because NO ONE at city hall will talk about it.

Everything you wrote about is true. But you left out the biggest problem at city hall. It comes down to poor business decisions and poor management.

Now here is a question for you. Of all the things you mentioned. And the evidence of mismanagement of the city's business. Which are the easiest to correct?

Raytown could be a success story, but when you put all of your eggs in one basket and give away 30% of your tax base to support one of the richest corporations in America, you are going to have trouble.

Please do not blame the city's problems on the working poor. Put the blame where it belongs. On very bad business decisions at city hall.

I disagree that changing who is running city hall will not make a difference. It will make a BIG difference. Because what we have now is not really running city hall. Watch a city council meeting. They spend more time on public comments and personal attacks against each other h other than they do on city business. Don't believe me? Watch the video of the last Council meeting. You can link to it on the home page of the city's website. Go to www.cityofraytownreachingfortomorrow.org

Anonymous said...

Very good points and right on. Forty plus years ago, Raytown wanted to stay a bedroom community, heavy on residential and truly controlling the businesses that were open in the city. This kind of thinking has killed this city as the population aged and changed. This is why the city will eventually fold. You have a large portion going to the school district, a portion, soon to be asked to be bigger, from the fire District since they are separate entities and the city gets the minimal scraps after that.

Anonymous said...

@7:32

While I appreciate your response and receptiveness, it was a bit political. I don’t blame the poor at all for the situation we are in. It’s just the reality, we got 15.5% poverty rate in Raytown. The politicians who support the TIFF are largely gone. Not really fair to blame somebody for a problem they did not create. No easy answers on this TIFF thing, except to dig our way out. The politicians in this City are too busy fighting each other. It looks to be like Washington D.C. only on a smaller level. Shift the deck chairs all you want but there is only so much any person or faction can do with the circumstances we are in. And I have little faith that such a change would accomplish much.

Anonymous said...

"I disagree that changing who is running city hall will not make a difference. It will make a BIG difference. Because what we have now is not really running city hall. Watch a city council meeting. They spend more time on public comments and personal attacks against each other h other than they do on city business. Don't believe me? Watch the video of the last Council meeting."

Pick a few cities that also post their council meetings online. Review them carefully. Be objective. They ALL have their share of factions, divisive behavior, petty as well as major squabbles and at times snarky moments where they have no problem letting it fly.

But there is nothing, and I mean NOTHING like watching -some- of the crew in Raytown conduct themselves. And it's depressingly consistent. They only pretend to work for us is the feeling that I'm always getting.

Agreed, October 28, 2018 at 7:32 PM. The time for change is now.

Anonymous said...

So you agree the blatant favoritism shown to HyVee and Walmart should come to an end? The waste of sending city owned police cars home to officers who live in Lee's Summit and beyond is another concern. It is irresponsible to cry about not having any money to run he city when you see unnecessary expenditures like the free use of city vehicles and fuel for Raytown's to largest retailers.

There are problems at city hall. Some can be solved with simple solution. But I do not think Mayor McDonough or the majority of the Board of Aldermen really want to find solutions.

They find it much easier to pretend they are working real hard to solve the city's problems. This make-believe type of governing is a waste of time. I am so glad an election is coming. It is time to turn out this do-nothing Mayor and Board of Aldermen.

Anonymous said...

"But I do not think Mayor McDonough or the majority of the Board of Aldermen really want to find solutions...I am so glad an election is coming. It is time to turn out this do-nothing Mayor and Board of Aldermen."

Reviewing one's high school reunion on "company time" as well as pulling in and posing with an enormous grin for one cell phone snap after another with area politicians and minor celebrities comes across as self-serving. Just another someone documenting a good time in the moment, and frankly, the practice has become rather annoying, in my opinion. Wonderful for preserving memories of good times, but I'm not seeing a great deal of effort or results otherwise.

Cannot emphasize enough that these remarks are nothing personal, "bashing", as is always the refrain from that peculiar handful, but I feel that changes are needed. Those changes need to start at the "top" (such as it is) and trickle down as warranted.

The citizens need to assume control and run their business. Ultimately, the culpability for what has happened lies with us, and it's our responsibility to repair this town. This predicament IS all our fault and no one else's.

Raytown Newbie said...

Well, I must have on my blue tinted glasses again.
Reading through the news this morning while enjoying my corn flakes, I noticed two upsetting banners. Paraphrasing here.
Cramer says current stock market slide reminds him of worst he's ever seen, and the budget deficit set to be highest since depths of great depression.
As a footnote to these is the undercurrent drumbeat of Republican leaders who claim the way out is to cut "entitlements". Scary for those of us in our "golden years".
Have a nice day Raytowners and vote next week.
RN

Anonymous said...

The irony is that our tax rate is higher than our neighbors and most of it goes to the school district but somehow there’s no hand-wringing about the size of the school district budget. Could it be that the problem is being oversimplified?

Anonymous said...

The school district is so fat, bloated and top heavy that they don't even know what one another are suppose to be doing. Cut the fat Raytown school district and pay the teachers more of a living salary. This has gotten out of control.

Andy Whiteman said...

I pointed out the problem with the School District's high property taxes over 15 years ago and was ignored. Obviously it wasn't important the but is now.
Andy Whiteman

Anonymous said...

Keep in mind that the largest part of any organization is salaries. The Raytown School District has around 1,300 employees, while the City of Raytown only has about 150 employees. So it makes sense that the school district's levy/budget should be higher than that of the city. I think Dr. Markley has done an outstanding job, given the adversity that the district is faced with in terms of coping with the inflow/outflow of transient students, etc. He's also very outspoken in Jefferson City in working for our community.

I'm just glad that 59th Street is finally being fixed, and I wish Raytown would put a bond on the ballot to fix the rest of the streets before interest rates get too high.

Anonymous said...

Andy, you were just ahead of your time. Some people are very stubborn in recognizing what is wrong. Probably because they have to admit to themselves they were wrong in their assumptions about how our current leadership in Raytown is doing a good job. Eating crow is not fun. Ask all of the former McDonough supporters. Many disappointed folks in Raytown. They know there is more to this city than a police department. They wish their elected officials knew as much.

Anonymous said...

11:23 a.m. And it sure would of been nice, not to mention fiscally responsible, if the gas tax would of passed to help finance that road bond you desire.... The local unions saw the importance of the motor fuel tax by endorsing it.

Derek Ward said...

"Keep in mind that the largest part of any organization is salaries. The Raytown School District has around 1,300 employees, while the City of Raytown only has about 150 employees. So it makes sense that the school district's levy/budget should be higher than that of the city."

Agree. But, it is fair to ask whether it is necessary and appropriate for Raytown to spend over $12,000 per student per year. Parochial schools can provide an arguably better education in many cases for roughly 1/3 that cost. True, it isn't apples to apples. However, a lot of money the district spends isn't related to educating students. It is also fair to ask whether the same educational results could be achieved with far fewer staff. Maybe not. But it is a fair question.

" I think Dr. Markley has done an outstanding job, given the adversity that the district is faced with in terms of coping with the inflow/outflow of transient students, etc"

Also agree. I just differ in my opinion as to how much it should cost to educate a student. Education is of course, critically important. But so are roads and sewers and there are only so many dollars available. Ignoring one side of the equation will eventually impact the other side.

Anonymous said...

But Mayor Micky would not say that the gas tax would only be used for road repair
in all probability it would have been used to give the Chief extra money. There
were no guaranty. I no longer have any feeling that the majority of the board
would do the right thing. Guess we can say well you Dirty Bird. They will know.

Anonymous said...

They have way too many upper management salaries kind of like the police department and the city. You don’t need a supervisor for every couple of employees. If a supervisor can’t manage more than a couple of people, there are issues.

Anonymous said...

The school district has 1300 employees? How many work at the health clinic set up specifically for them? Make no mistake about it. The Raytown School District is bloated to the point exploding. If they were turning out a quality product it would make sense. But that is not the case. The management's main interest is in where to send their next resume'. Markley would be gone but no one really wants him.

Anonymous said...

I worked at the Raytown School District a few years back.
I vice principal for each 7th, 8th and 9th grade, same as high school. When I went to school in the late 70's, we had 1 principal and 1 vice principal, that it and they handled everything and everybody. These V-principals and principals make 80k on up.
The waste in the district is UN-believeable!