Petition
Presented
to
State Auditor
Representatives
of an effort calling for an Audit of the City of Raytown by the Missouri State
Auditor’s office formally presented petitions to Missouri State Auditor Nicole
Galloway last Thursday.
Petitioners
submitted over 1800 signatures, far exceeding the number required to begin the
audit process.
The
petitions will be reviewed by the Jackson County Election Board to validate
signatures as to authenticity.
The
lead petitioner in the call for a state audit, Mr. Tony Jacob said, “The
petitioners hope the review will identify problems and make recommendations to
restore trust and improve city services”.
Most
signatures were collected after the August election when voters defeated three
tax questions the Mayor and Board of Aldermen had placed on the ballot. The
three issues before the voters were defeated by lopsided margins.
Political
observers say the results demonstrated a lack of trust between the electorate
and City Hall.
According
to the petition request areas of concern outlined in the audit request include
but are not limited to:
Mismanagement
of the police department. In 2017, the city lost many positions in the patrol
staffing of the police department. Petitioners claim more officers left the
department than required to meet the city's budgetary concerns. They point to
mismanagement as the base cause of shortage.
Inadequate
policies in the handling of employee time records. Another area of concern is
the city's policies regarding staff time records. Petitioners point to abuse of
time keep records as a concern. Evidence of time records being changed after
they have been submitted by employees have been found.
Hostile
work environment. The city has experienced a large turnover of leadership
positions, specifically in the area of City Administrator and Finance Director.
In the
last four years the city has had three City Administrators and three Finance
Directors. Current and former staff describe racial and gender discrimination,
failures to follow internal policies, and the disciplining of employees
(whistle blowers) who bring problems to light.
Lack of
transparency. In several instances, requests for information from the city have
been met with delays, denials and unreasonable costs to those requesting
information. Records of said requests have been falsified at City Hall.
"Over
the last decade there have been attempts by citizens, elected officials, and
the Raytown Fire Protection District to call for an independent state audit of
the City of Raytown," said Jacob.
The
City Responds
![]() |
| DAMON HODGES |
In a
prepared statement on the city's website the city responded to the news of the
petitions being turned in to the State Auditor's office.
City
Administrator Damon Hodges wrote, "The City of Raytown has been made aware
by media reports of the submission to the State Auditor’s office of a petition
audit request. To date, the City of Raytown has not received a copy of the
petition."
“Until
we receive communication from the Missouri State Auditor’s office, we are
unable to comment further,” said Mr. Hodges.
| BY PAUL LIVIUS |
Paul’s Rant!
Say
what! A petition calling for a state audit has been filed with the Missouri
State Auditor, Nicole Galloway.
No
doubt a good number of people are aware of the petition. After all, over 1800
Raytowners signed the petition. So it is a fair guess they knew what they were
signing.
I
visited with the lead petitioner, Tony Jacob. He told me he is puzzled by the
city’s response (see the comments from City Administrator Damon Hodges) and
other city officials who expressed no knowledge of an audit in Raytown.
“After
all,” said Jacob, “a number of city officials, elected and appointed, signed
the audit petition.”
According
to Jacob the Chief of Police, Jim Lynch, who has also denied any knowledge of
an audit, sent a multi page reply to the
Kansas City Star.
"If
he had no knowledge of an audit, what on earth did he write on those
pages?" asked Jacob.
It does
not really matter at this point. The petitions are turned in. The Jackson
County Election Board will now do its “due diligence” by verifying the
signatures.
Once
the signatures are verified, the matter is out of the city’s hands and into the
hands of the State Auditor.
No doubt
there will be other proclamations from city officials and parties hereunto not
named, with comments as the process moves forward.
Hopefully
they will be a little more forthcoming than claiming they are unaware of an
audit being conducted.



Comments
In a perfect world the state audit will show all is well in Raytown. If there is less than "all is well" it will also expose the problems that need to be addressed.
A state audit is not that rare. Clay County Missouri is currently having one conducted at well.
How is the above unreasonable? What Greg has written makes perfect sense.
Common sense. Yes, the state audit costs money. Some of these people in Raytown City government brought it upon themselves due to their actions and behavior in the last few years. They simply need to look in the mirror. It makes me angry that our money has to fund this audit. But this review is imperative at this point. Most of these people currently in office aren't getting another cent from us until the State steps in.
We fervently hope that some of these people walk away from their elected offices when their term expires. It's not all about you. Give the chance to someone else - support them in THEIR efforts. This sentiment is overwhelmingly directed at this current mayor. I feel that we could do so much better.
I urge every citizen to write a detailed letter to Ms. Galloway in Jefferson City outlining your concerns.
I also would like to speak to the people that keep bringing up the annual audit not only did this last one miss transfers, but the two are not the same! The state audit will look into policies and procedures, the annual does not. The annual audit would not report if someone is stealing as long as a check was written, it doesn't question why.
The state audit will find out why we are awarding no bid contracts, why we pay overages on contracts, and why political donors get special treatment.
It will also delve into the thousands of dollars of tax money that has been transferred to private corporations.
Some of this info has been posted publically for months, and some items turned over have not been discussed at all. Affidavits from current and former employees can be turned into her as well as using the whistle blower hotline. Your anonymity will be protected by state law.
Office of the Missouri State Auditor
Call: (800) 347-8597
Email: moaudit@auditor.mo.gov
Mail: State Auditor's Office, P.O. Box 869, Jefferson City, MO 65102
Who is filing does matter to some people. Many of them have changed and adapted to using the web as their source for finding out what is happening in Raytown.
Maybe we have another department head (city clerk) that need to find employment some other place.
Keep in mind the amount of money she has cost the taxpayers because part of the job when hired was to do the minutes from the board meetings, but that was to much stress for her and we hired an outside company to do that task.
She should have been let go for not being able to do the job she was hired to do.
The current administration is about waste and looking the other way.
You may not care who runs our city but there are a lot of us who do.
Please be a little more open minded and considerate of others.
Andy Whiteman
You post on this page so you are evidently aware of the internet and how it can be used as a news source.
So lets talk about what this is really about. There are some who actually benefit because the names of their opponents are not published. Without naming names, they are called incumbents. Now why would an incumbent not want a challenger's name published?
Your turn bubba. Go ahead and make your excuses for bureaucrats who will not do their job and their bosses who are protecting them.
The Mayor and his special lady don't want anyone to know the challengers are true. They freeze them off all city sites, and even the social ones. They've gone as far as booting people that mention them in the comments. But I think the real reason the city doesn't publish the names is no one wants to run, there's so many holes and people unchallenged it shows just how disfuntional it is. No one wants to deal with it. on
Publish | Delete | Spam
Anonymous at 7:38 AM
When one side keeps the name of the other side from being published they are no longer equals.
Whoever is in charge at city hall or whoever's resonsibility it is to make sure it happens, do the right thing. Do your job. Post names of who has filed for public office in Raytown.
SNOW FLAKES HOW ABOUT ILL-INFORMED PEOPLE THAT WANT TO SIT OUTSIDE AND DICTATE HOW TO RUN CITY HALL. GO FILE FOR A SEAT AND SHUT UP!!!
I hope all of these smart read you post.
Well attacks on the City Clerk. Let the games begin.
What does it take for people to quit throwing dirt on Raytown. We look bad enough and you people just don't get it. Other cities are looking at us and laughing. Dams Idiots
"The Mayor and his special lady don't want anyone to know..."
Is this "special lady" the one that was unable to attend a city council meeting last Fall, so the mayor directed a city employee to read her citizen comment? Unlike the rest of the common folk? No "specialness" there, IMHO. Gack!
I think so. He gave her a "proclamation" too.
that they would get tired of people with the same request.
Guess we now know the pecking order at Raytown City Hall.
No conspiracy theory here. Check it out for yourself. By the way, thanks for the roadmap to get me where the site is located. I would never have guessed it was so cleverly hidden away. But it does make me wonder. Why is it hidden away like that?
You seem like a clever fellow. Maybe you can explain why taxpayers should have to jump through hoops to find out who has filed for city office.
Good job running the city into the ground Mikey.
Might give an insight of how state audits are handled in Missouri.
Office of the Missouri State Auditor
Call: (800) 347-8597
Email: moaudit@auditor.mo.gov
Mail: State Auditor's Office, P.O. Box 869, Jefferson City, MO 65102
Concerns can also be submitted anonymously online at auditor.mo.gov/hotline
It's very important that any Raytowner that is truly concerned about the survival of this City to have your voice heard. When submitting comments to this office, please make certain that your complaints are extremely detailed.
Many of us have first-hand knowledge of a couple of these officeholders that span decades. We're aware of a number of events that have occurred over years.
Unfortunately, we can relate them to several recent incidents.
It's vital that we support each other in order for the Auditor's Office to piece together a comprehensive understanding of the issues in this town.
I guess you haven't noticed all the city, county, state and federal government officials and employees who have got caught with their hand in the cookie jar in recent years.
Trust.....but verify!
Nit picker.
Why do the CAPS bother you? Something you can't control.
Thank you. Only one new person, who remains on the BOA came into office, after looking at many factors, publicly stated a need for an audit. Guess what? that person got called all sorts of names, even many not repeatable. How about even our so called city collector saying things (On Raytown Unleashed Blog), we need to get rid of, "that
Black ----." So the nastiness went from that person to Tony Jacobs. REALLY? All of the new people have been trying to fix the long overdue issues. They keep telling us. Wake up people.
Who else are you going to blame before realizing there's a money problem in Raytown. ijs
Black ----." So the nastiness went from that person to Tony Jacobs.
While I'm definitely no fan of that city collector, if it can be SUBSTANTIATED that she called anyone "...that black..." , she needs to be terminated from office immediately and be permanently barred from participating in anything associated with the City. We're right there with you. Otherwise, if you can't prove that she made those remarks, you need to CAN IT with the free range race baiting. It's self-serving and provokes needless antagonism.
IJS. (I'm just saying.)
The mayor promised these millions and come to find out he can't deliver once again. I remember when a guy went up at a meeting and already said he lined up financing and the city turned it down because it wasn't the mayor's idea. Last year I saw that he brought 3 million in grants and this year over a million and the city turned all of them down.
Sad day when elected officials put their pride before the best interest of the city.
Those are very serious accusations being made in the comments towards the city collector and with zero proof shown. Why is that being allowed without proof or a name being signed?
I know first hand, I was there at some of the meetings of discussion about this person and there was talk about running someone against that person. It was also posted on Raytown Unleashed. Ask out of town Susie. Better yet, ask the mayor.
ijs
Oh plueeze, anonymous person. You're not doing anything to further your cause. And if these remarks truly were made, they undoubtedly would have been acted upon by other people who would have found them as offensive as we do.
Put up or...
As for Suz, Unglued, or certain elected officials, their "disaccreditation" (is that a word?) is nearly complete. They've all been spiraling towards irrelevancy for quite some time.
If you have something constructive to add, SPILL. Otherwise, let's get to work on fixing this city.
Is it me? Or are most all the posters calling for the end of anonymous postings ....
ANONYMOUS
Now that's too funny.
We are a 4th class city the department heads serve at the pleasure of the Board.
The exception would only be in a tie vote, which allows input from the mayor.
Sadly we have a Board of Alderman that is very lacking when it comes to making sure we get our moneys worth from the department heads.
However, the house cleaning needs to start with whoever is over code enforcement.
I find it hard to believe your employer doesn't hold you accountable.
It is "FACT" that the prior city clerks took the minutes of the board meetings.
The one we have thought it was too hard for her, yet the board didn't address the problem. They instead went to the magic money tree and pulled a few more leaves so they could fund a company to type up the minutes.
The reality as we know there is no magic tree, which really came to light last year when another department head had a public breakdown because of how much his department was going to have to be de-funded.
Accountability is what is needed if we are going to move our city forward and put a stop the the dirt as you called.
That is why we need a state audit!
Thank you for helping with the justification.
Facts: The City is low on funds. We can thank the 40 million dollar TIF that the BOA voted for in 2007 and 2011. They voted to give the School District over 30 million of that amount leaving the City holding the bag. Among those were on the BOA at the time, Jim Aziere and Joe Creamer voted for it. Greg Walters was the only one to voice concern. Now they are both running for Aldermen! What will they do to help the City when they have helped put us under the bus? (By the way, I went on the City website and found out who was running. Wasn't a difficult thing to do).
When the WalMart Neighborhood Market was before the Planning and Zoning Commission and the BOA, the people turned out in the hundreds to protest. Joe Creamer voted for it. Jim Aziere passed on the first vote to see how it was going to turn out even though he was strongly in favor of it. When his vote didn't matter, he voted no. When it passed, (10-4), WalMart decided to pull out because of the people who did not want it, and they also thought there was going to be a lawsuit over it. Mayor Bower went to Arkansas to WalMart's headquarters, and begged them to reconsider. They did not. I believe we can be thankful that we do not have it on the green space.
Facts are truth.
Hope people will begin to understand that misinformation is not truth. Let's work together to make Raytown strong again.