Sunday, March 24, 2019

To leave a comment use this link
OR CONTACT THE RAYTOWN REPORT DIRECTLY AT
admin@raytownreport.org

Raytown Forum a Huge Success
BY PAUL LIVIUS
Do you get the feeling that a lot of people in Raytown are undecided at this late hour on who to vote for Alderman and for Mayor. I know I do. I was not able to attend the Raytown Candidate Forum sponsored by the Raytown Chamber of Commerce and the League of Women Voters. But I did find the following link to the meeting.

It was impressive event. Over 100 of Raytowners packed the Raytown Christian Church to hear what the candidates had to say. Some of the candidates were impressive. Some were a disappointment. The upside of all of this is that everyone had an opportunity to hear what their candidates for Alderman and Mayor had to say.

It was an interesting evening.

We should honor all of those candidates who showed up for the event. All but five of the candidates were on hand to speak to the issues*.

Please use the following link to see and hear what the candidates had to say.

*The five candidates who did not attend the forum were Joe Creamer, Loretha Hayden, Josh Bennett, Otis Taylor III and Quentin J. Brown (Ms. Brown had previously announced her withdrawal from the race in late February)


To leave a comment use this link
OR CONTACT THE RAYTOWN REPORT DIRECTLY AT
admin@raytownreport.org



RAYTOWN FREE STORM VOUCHER PROGRAM TO END MARCH 29TH
The City of Raytown is offering free vouchers for the disposal of tree limbs from winter storms. The offer expires on March 29th. The vouchers have a value of $50 and can be redeemed at dump locations on 40 Highway and Raytown Road.

Vouchers can be obtained at the Public Works Department located at Raytown City Hall, 10000 East 59th Street from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 pm., Monday through Friday.

The vouchers must be used by April 15, 2019.

If you have any questions you can reach the Public Works Department by calling 737-6000 (press option 8 for the Public Works Department.


CANDIDATE FORUM
The League of Women Voters will conduct a Candidate Forum for the Mayoral and City Council candidates in Raytown on Tuesday, March 26, 2019 from 6:00 to 7:45 p.m.

Mark your calendars for this important event!

Tuesday, March 26, 2019        6:00 to 7:45 in the evening
Raytown Christian Church
6108 Blue Ridge Boulevard       Raytown, MO 64133

Sign, Sign,
Everywhere a Sign BY PAUL LIVIUS
There has been sooooo much on social media these last few days about signs I thought it would be a good idea to, how shall I say, “set the record straight”, on the law in Raytown regarding political signs.

So I had Greg send a request up to City Hall for a copy of the city’s current sign ordinance. Greg had told me the city does not really have many laws concerning political signs.

He said, “They (political signs) are protected under the First Amendment . . . the right to free speech.”

He also added what he calls an interesting “fun fact”. “The roots of political signage can be traced back to the time of the Romans – when Roman citizens would use graffiti on public walls to express their opinion on issues of the day”.

Enough of Greg’s history lesson, I was really more interested the current laws affecting political signs in Raytown in the 21st Century.

Here is what I found.

SECTION 25-3.16
PERMITS: A permit is not required for a political sign.

SIZE: In residential areas a political sign is limited to 8 square feet in size.

WHERE: Political signs are not allowed on the City Right of Way.*

WHEN: Political signs are allowed to be placed or erected on “the last day after qualification of candidates”** Political signs are to be removed from the city within ten days after the election.

URBAN LEGENDS / POLITICAL MYTHS: 
·        Contrary to popular belief, there is not a required setback of seven feet from the road mentioned in the city’s ordinances. Public right of way varies from street to street. For instance, when 59th Street was constructed, all of the right of way was used up to allow for sidewalks. This means a yard sign can be placed right next the sidewalk (as opposed to seven feet back). As long as the sign is on private property, it is perfectly legal.

·        As an example, the last day of qualification for the April 2, 2019 city election is the second Tuesday in February. This means a political sign can be placed on private property from February 12 through April 2nd.

All of that being said, or, in this case, written, clears up what is illegal and what is not. There is, however one other subject. Who is breaking the laws on political signs? So, I grabbed by trusty cell phone and went hunting for illegal political signs in Raytown.

Greg tells me he has heard from a few candidates who have been told their signs were on the right of way and that they need to be moved. I wondered, so I asked him if he had received any notification from the city on illegal signage.

His reply was “no”.

Greg is a veteran of many political campaigns. He says it is very easy to comply with the law. As he pointed out to me, “Why would I make myself more work by not following the city’s ordinances?”

Good question.

Paul’s Rant! BY PAUL LIVIUS
I believe the whole yard sign debate is a Red Herring. A red herring in political terms is a non-issue thrown into the debate to distract from real issues.

Raytown has really important topics in need of attention.

The recent court ruling in which the city was fined $43,000 for not following the State Sunshine Law is a good example.

The slow bleeding of the city’s tax dollars to pay down the 350 Highway TIF is another. The city has budgeted over $200,000 from this year’s budget to prop up the bond payments due to bondholders.

The settlement with the Fire District over a lawsuit (initiated by the city) cost the taxpayers over $147,802.25 and a payment of tax money back to the Fire District of over $100,000. All of those bold faced numbers are for real. They all have one thing in common. It was all money wasted because of poor decisions at Raytown City Hall.

The total of those five items comes to $493,000. That is nearly half a milliion dollars that could have been used to repair our streets, put in street lights or even hire additional police officers. 

     Some people are all excited about yard signs. I guess that is their right to be so. But for my money, we have bigger fish to fry on April 2nd.


A NOTE FROM PAUL LIVIUS: It has come to my attention that there are some who are trying to cast doubt on a dispute between the Raytown Fire District and the City of Raytown last Spring. The following story, based on information received from the City of Raytown through the Missouri Sunshine Law, is a re-print of a story published in the Raytown Report on April 18, 2018. We hope this information puts to rest any questions regarding the validity of both the story from last April and from this week's story.


BY GREG WALTERS
CITY / FIRE DISTRICT
SETTLE LAWSUITS
$147,802.25 in Legal Fees
Lawsuit(s) between the City of Raytown and the Raytown Fire Protection District racked up $147,802.25 in legal expenses over tax payments to the Raytown 350 Live TIF. 

Last November the City of Raytown and the Raytown Fire Protection District settled a dispute over tax payments ear marked to fund the Raytown Live (350 Highway) TIF Plan. The Raytown Live TIF Plan was used to fund the purchase and development of the area currently occupied by Walmart on 350 Highway.

Even though the agreement was reached last November, there had not been any public announcement of the dismissal of the law suits.

After a number of requests were ignored by officials of the City and Fire District, we made a formal Freedom of Information Request for documents relevant to the settlement.

The City of Raytown used two law firms to represent them in the dispute.  For their services the respective law firms billed:

Kapke and Willerth . . . . . . . . . . . .  billed   $6,518.75
Williams & Campo . . . . . . . . . . . .   billed   $71,164.50

The Raytown Fire Protection District used one law firm.
Polsnelli . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   billed    $70,119.00

For a combined total of  . . . . . . . . . . . .    $147,802.25


THE DISPUTE
Through an internal audit, the Raytown Fire Protection District came to believe they were being over-billed by the city for their share of the  payments made towards the Raytown Live (350 Highway) TIF plan.

The discovery eventually led to the Fire District withholding (at least) $20,000 in TIF payment to the City to Raytown.

In response, the City of Raytown sued the Raytown Fire District in an effort to collect the money being withheld.

The Fire District countersued the City. The District claimed they were only responsible for payments to the TIF District for participation in Project 1 of the TIF Agreement. Project 1 encompasses the land currently occupied by Walmart on 350 Highway.

The dispute never went to trial. It was officially settled on November 21, 2017. The final product is a 14 page long Mutual Release and Settlement Agreement.

By the terms of that agreement, the City would receive $20,000 in payments from the Fire District.

In turn, the Fire District is released from paying any additional payments to the TIF District.

The City also agrees to provide the District clarification regarding the $7,335,833 asset of the October 31, 2016 balance sheet.

An interesting document is the original TIF Agreement. In the document it clearly states the Raytown Fire Protection District would only participate in Section 1 of the TIF Development. Section 1 encompasses the land occupied by Walmart on 350 Highway.

The following pages are the key parts of the agreement (pages 4, 5, 6 and Exhibit 1. The entire 14 page document is a pubic document and can be obtained through Raytown City Hall or through the Raytown Fire Protection District. (click on image to make larger)
PAGE 4
PAGE 5
















PAGE 6
 



THE PAUL LIVIUS REPORT
Raytown Board of Aldermen Meeting
March 19, 2019

The Board passed a resolution approving the appointment of Brent Hugh to the Raytown Park Board.

Brian Waters and Tony Jacob made comments to the Board.

The Board passed a resolution authorizing an agreement with UMB Bank.  With the appointments of Finance Director Russ Petry and City Administrator Damon Hodges, it is necessary to update authorizing agents for banking business. The authority granted by this resolution empowers the agents to manage the City’s investment activity and authorize other banking business items as required.

The Board passed a resolution approving a memorandum of understanding permitting the Police Department to enter into an agreement via the Memorandum of Understanding with Ring LLC.  The increased popularity of home surveillance systems is well-known.

The Ring LLC doorbell is a very popular product and already in use in Raytown by many members of the community. Ring offers a video sharing app, which allows users to share videos with their neighbors. This app, called “Neighbors” provides a unique approach to the neighborhood watch idea. Ring also facilitates video sharing with local law enforcement. 

The attached Memorandum of Understanding is required for the City of Raytown and the Police Department to participate. This concept is already in place with several cities in the metro area and has proven to be a viable idea. Police Departments can reach out to residents, whom are Ring users, when a crime has been committed in their neighborhood and ask residents to share any video they may have relevant to the crime.

It is important to note that this agreement will not give the Police Department access to residents’ videos or cameras. The residents must elect to share a video via the sharing app.

The video is then hosted by Ring. I believe this program will improve the Police Department’s ability to investigate and prosecute crimes. I also believe that awareness of this program will act as a crime deterrent in participating neighborhoods. There is no cost to the residents or the City to participate in this program.
_____________________________

The City posted the following press release regarding a Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Raytown and the NAACP.

“The City of Raytown and the Kansas City, Missouri Branch of the NAACP are proud to announce that they have updated a Memorandum of Understanding executed on December 6, 2005 for the purpose of continuing to build strong relationships between the City, the Raytown Police Department and minority members of the community. Representatives of the City, the Raytown Police Department, the Kansas City, Missouri Branch NAACP, and the Department of Justice’s Community Relations Service met to review specific action steps and timelines for implementation identified in the 2005 MOU. The representatives noted the completion of certain tasks. The amended Memorandum of Understanding incorporates new specific action steps addressing current issues and sets timelines for implementation. The document addresses a wide variety of topics, from the hiring of new employees to the review of how complaints about local government are handled. Mayor Michael McDonough and Rev. Dr. Williams are enthusiastic that all parties were able to work together on this effort. Mayor McDonough stated, “I am very pleased that we could come together to update this meaningful document, in our effort to keep current on important issues impacting our community, for the present and for our future.”

Ward 5 Alderman Derek Ward, who also serves as liaison to the Raytown Park Board, gave a report on the Park Board’s most recent meeting. He told Board members the Park Board had been approached by a private concern interested in purchasing the waterslides from the old Super Splash Water Park. The Rice Tremonti Historic Home had a 40 tons of gravel put in its parking area.

He also reported that at the last Park Board meeting, one of the Park Board members referred to the Board of Aldermen as a “bunch of idiots”. Ward said it was very disappointing to hear, and noted that not one Park Board member apologized or expressed disagreement with the comment. He felt the comment was very unprofessional.

To view the meeting in its entirety use the following link:
BOARD OF ALDERMEN MEETING


To leave a comment use this link
OR CONTACT THE RAYTOWN REPORT DIRECTLY AT
admin@raytownreport.org

To my Readers,

BY GREG WALTERS
A couple of weeks ago I received and email from Susan Vorbeck Brown. Mrs. Brown manages a local Facebook page named Raytown Unleashed.

Mrs. Brown wrote:

“I have attached a candidate questionnaire created by members of the community.  The community was asked what questions they'd like their candidates to answer and this is the result.  This questionnaire is completely voluntary and is not sponsored by any group, business or organization.  It's simply a way for the voters to get to know their candidates.”

At the end of questionnaire Mrs. Brown asks for any additional comments. So I thought, why not? There are two subjects of importance not covered by the Mrs. Brown's questionnaire.

I was surprised the questionnaire did not address residency rules for the Chief of Police. Nor did it address taxation.

My response will lead with those two topics and then go into Mrs. Brown’s questionnaire.

Two topics not covered by the questionnaire.
RESIDENCY REQUIREMENTS / CHIEF OF POLICE:
One of the ballot questions we will vote on April 2nd asks if the position of Chief of Police should be appointive or elective.

I hold firm in my belief that the head of our Police Department must live within the city limits. Police are unique in public service. They are our first responders in an emergency. The leader of Police Department must be hands on when emergencies arise. Not 40 to 60 minutes away in another town.

The Mayor and Board of Aldermen did not address this question when they placed the elective vs. appointive issue on the ballot.

If elected, I pledge to work to make certain our Chief of Police lives in Raytown.

While on the topic of residency I wish to discuss what I believe is an opportunity for Raytown.

Many Raytowners are concerned with crime and police protection. As our police department is rebuilt, it may pay dividends if newly hired police officers were offered incentives to make Raytown their home. This would increase the police presence in Raytown where people want it the most, in our neighborhoods.

At this point it is just a thought. But it is a possibility I believe deserves discussion.

TAXATION
  • Last August there were three tax increases on the August ballot.
  • This April, there are four more tax questions that affect property tax rates.
  • The Mayor and three lame duck Aldermen have repeatedly tried to place an additional Park Tax on August ballot* prior to the April 2nd election.
*The cutoff off date to place the Park Tax on the August ballot is May 28th. Why the hurry? The Mayor and three Aldermen, who have chosen not to run for re-election, are behind this scheme to force the Park Tax onto the August ballot ahead of its time. A new Board of Aldermen will be sworn in after the April election. It will be their decision to make.

This constant barrage of tax increase proposals is a mistake. I have been walking the neighborhoods in Ward 1. There is a strong anti-tax vibe coming from voters. The voters are not to blame. Their antipathy towards repeated (high) tax increase questions is understandable

Taxes are needed to sustain a community. This shotgun approach to raising taxes is poor politics and doomed to failure. 

Raytown is one of the highest taxed communities in Jackson County. The following comparison chart shows where Raytown ranks in property and sales tax rates.

SALES TAX COMPARISON OF AREA JACKSON COUNTY CITIES*

4.250% . . . . . . KANSAS CITY, MO
4.125% . . . . . . RAYTOWN
3.875% . . . . . . GRANDVIEW
3.625% . . . . . . LEE’S SUMMIT
3.625% . . . . . . INDEPENDENCE
3.375% . . . . . . BLUE SPRINGS
*SALES TAX RATES SHOWN DO NOT INCLUDE MISSOURI SALES TAX RATES OR SPECIAL TAX DISTRICTS LIKE WALMART, HYVEE AND SUTHERLAND LUMBER (which all have higher tax rates).

PROPERTY TAX COMPARISON OF AREA JACKSON COUNTY CITIES*

9.4335 per $100 valuation . . . . . . KANSAS CITY, MO
9.0668 per $100 valuation . . . . . . LEE’S SUMMIT
9.0558 per $100 valuation . . . . . . RAYTOWN
8.4043 per $100 valuation . . . . . . INDEPENDENCE
8.3990 per $100 valuation . . . . . . BLUE SPRINGS
8.3949 per $100 valuation . . . . . . GRANDVIEW
*SOURCE: JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI.


Susan Vorbeck-Brown's
Candidate Questionnaire
NAME:                                  Greg Walters

ADDRESS:                           Raytown:    Life Time Resident
                                              Ward 1:      Ward 1 resident 42 years

EMPLOYER:                         Service Printing and Graphics, Inc.

CAMPAIGN TREASURER:           Greg Walters      816-517-6852  

EMAIL:                                           admin@raytownreport.org  

OFFICE SOUGHT:     
Alderman, Ward 1

INCUMBENT?                                
No

HAVE YOU EVER BEEN ELECTED TO PUBLIC OFFICE BEFORE?
Yes

IF YES, LIST TITLE AND YEARS OF SERVICE:       
Raytown Charter Commission (twice)
Jackson County Democratic Committee (one term)
Raytown Board of Aldermen  1980 – 1996 / 1998 – 2009

What qualifications do you believe make you a good fit for this position?
I bring nearly 34 years of public service experience to the table. Those years of public service taught me the value of teamwork, the importance of listening and working toward common goals. I was twice elected as Mayor Protem by my fellow aldermen. More importantly, the voters in Ward 1 elected me in 12 elections to represent them. I am active in the community and am willing to serve again.

What is your vision for Raytown’s future?
I recognize an opportunity for Raytown with the completion of the Rock Island Trail. The Rock Island Trail is linked to the Katy Trail. Brett Hugh, Executive Director of the Missouri Bicycle and Pedestrian Federation recently told me shared with me the following information:
·       The Rock Island Trail connects to the Katy Trail. The Katy Trail follows the Missouri River across the state to St. Louis.
·       Over 500,000 bicyclists, runners and hikers make use of the Katy Trail each year. The Katy Trail does not come to Raytown, but through its connection to the Rock Island Trail, it will be connected. Raytown needs to be prepared for this influx of people crossing Missouri.
·       Raytown has been designated the western terminus of the Katy Trail. The influx of people on recreational holiday can be a boon to Raytown’s economy. It is an opportunity we must be ready to take advantage. It will definitely funnel many people to our Downtown area. The economic possibilities are many.
·       An influx of bicyclists into the Raytown area will result in the need for restaurants, entertainment and places for people to kick back and relax.

     For the past ten years I have participated in a bike ride across the State of Iowa (RAGBRAI*). I have witnessed the economic engine and its impact as over 25,000 bicyclists come to a community. It is something to behold. This success story can be part of Raytown’s legacy.
                *(Des Moines) Register's Annual Great Bike Ride Across Iowa

Are you currently involved in community activities in Raytown.
Yes. Former Raytown Alderman Garth Bare and I created a website back in 2007 named the Raytown Reporter. It has since grown into the Raytown Report. Ours was the first web-based news service in Raytown. We have since expanded the Raytown Report with a Blog that has a steady flow of commentary from Raytown citizens. Many have told me they appreciate our weekly publication and rely upon it for accurate news of the goings on at Raytown City Hall.
The Raytown Report can be accessed at:      www.raytownreport.org

What made you decide to run for office in Raytown?
I received numerous requests from the Raytown community asking me to run for office.

How long have you been a Raytown resident?
64 years.

Do you feel you can make unbiased and sometimes difficult decisions that affect the community and its finances?
Yes.

Do you have the ability and will work with all members of the Board and Mayor without prejudice.
Yes. My record on the Board of Aldermen is a good one. Many of the laws we live under were conceived by me and approved by the Board. The value of teamwork, patience and understanding cannot be over-emphasized in the goal to create successful legislation.

How do you plan to communicate with your constituents, and will you provide multiple avenues for communication to suit the needs of those constituents?
I will continue to publish the Raytown Report. I have it to be a very effective way to
keep the lines of communication open and flowing. I can be reached by email at admin@raytownreport.org and by telephone or text at 816-517-6852.

How will you encourage economic development and growth in Raytown?
We should recognize the mistakes of the past that have placed Raytown in its position of economic peril. We must recognize two truths. One, that you cannot tax yourself into prosperity. Two, we must stop the failed policy of tax abatements and other forms of corporate welfare to attract corporate America to Raytown.

Raytown’s economic problems can be traced back to the formation of the 350 Live TIF District on 350 Highway. In order to gain a lower interest rate on development bonds the City agreed to guarantee payment of the debt to bond holders*.
*I was the only Board member to vote against the Walmart TIF.

We must re-structure the debt payment to terms that allow Raytown to start re-building itself. By doing so, we can show the business world that Raytown is a place where business start-ups are welcome. They, in turn, will recognize an opportunity for their business and Raytown’s future.

Entrepreneurs have been the catalysts to growth and development in Kansas City. How would you make Raytown attractive to those investors?
I believe I have answered that question in number 9. However, I would add that Raytown has a unique advantage in the metropolitan area. Major freeways surround our city to the north, south, east and west. We are 20 to 30 minutes to everywhere in the metropolitan area. 

What do you do for a living?
Printing/Publishing/Direct Mail

Educational background?
Graduate of Archbishop O’Hara High School. Class of 1972.

What are your long term plans in politics?
Currently to be elected to the Raytown Board of Aldermen. I do not have any political aspirations beyond the Board of Aldermen.

Are you willing to vote in a way that reflects the wishes of your ward; not your personal preference?
Yes.

How will you supervise those who enforce the various ordinances and laws in Raytown?
Board members do not supervise employees. That is the responsibility of Department Heads. At the same time it is important for Board members to be aware of what is happening at City Hall. It is the Board’s proper function to raise the alarm and work with Department heads if there are problems that need addressing. This “team” approach is true in any well run organization. It can work in Raytown as well.

Have there been orders or judgments against you of a criminal nature?
No.

Within the last three years, have you paid your taxes in a timely manner.
Yes.

What are your plans to make Raytown more bicycle friendly?
I was on the Board of Aldermen when Raytown first recognized the need for bicycle lanes on major streets. When the old wooden bridge in Downtown Raytown was renovated I took a leading role in making certain bicycle lanes were incorporated into it. When 87th Street was widened and re-built, bicycle lanes were included. Blue Ridge Cutoff was striped with wider lanes on the outside lanes to accommodate bicycle traffic. Raytown must continue to take a progressive route in making room for bicycle travel on public streets.

During Board meetings it has been noted that members of the Board are not paying attention to speakers and are sometimes looking at their cell phone. How would you battle this issue?
I have visited with members of the Board of Aldermen about this topic. From those conversations, I believe the accusation to be false. Ward 5 Alderman Derek Ward has publicly stated he uses his phone as a laptop for information during discussion at Board meetings. His seatmate, Bonnaye Mims, has a son, who is blind. He contacted her during one meeting via cell phone (using an audio ap) in an emergency.

However, I have viewed instances of unprofessional behavior, loud obnoxious language, and personal attacks on private citizens that happen all too often at meetings of the Board of Aldermen.

The Mayor, as Chairman of the meeting, has the authority to call down and stop such instances. To not do so would be to condone such behavior.

I pledge that I will conduct myself in a civil manner at public meetings. Meetings of the Board of Aldermen are Public Business Meetings. Board meetings should be conducted in a professional manner without rancor or anger. 

Who inspires you?
My mother and father. My wife, our children, my grandchild and my twin grandchildren to be (due in August).

How would your motivate citizens to be more active in the community and promote positive change?
I would lead by example. It may sound like a cliché, but there is much we can do if we all pull together.

Can you speak of a time when you had a goal and did not achieve it? What did you learn from the experience?
We all have goals that are not met. We all stumble and fall. The best lesson learned is to get back up and try again. The greatest lesson we can learn from our failures is to understand why they were not successes. Just as important, learn to not make the same mistakes again.

Can you speak to the top three issues you believe concern Raytown citizens the most?
Proper maintenance of neighborhood streets. People are very disappointed it with the use of Light Aggregate Seal (LAS) to repair our streets. LAS is meant to lengthen the life road tops in good condition. In Raytown the city has used LAS as an attempt to repair streets that should be milled and properly repaired with new asphalt.

The public has lost faith in and trust in City Hall. The last tax election in August of 2018, in which two tax proposals were defeated by an 80% to 20% margin, show the depth of this disconnect between elected officials and the public. We must work to re-build that trust.

Some members of the current administration seem to have a problem accepting “no” for an answer. The new Board of Aldermen should make earning the faith of the people of Raytown their number one priority.

Transparency in government is a very is a real problem at City Hall. The recent debacle in which the city was fined $42,000 by the Courts by failing to comply with a Sunshine Law request is not new in Raytown. I personally have made Sunshine Requests that were stonewalled and held up by city staff for two weeks for very flimsy reasons. It took the intervention of the Attorney General’s Office of the State of Missouri to get the requests fulfilled.

Laws like the Sunshine Law in Missouri and the Freedom of Information Act on the federal level are in place for a reason. Such laws fight corruption in our government by allowing the public access to how our government works. Raytown is not above those rules and laws.

Is your candidacy being sponsored by any business?
No.

Discuss a time when you were a leader of change. How did you get the buy-in from those around you?
In 2001 we experienced a winter somewhat similar to the one we are going through now. There were two major differences. It was much colder and, natural gas prices, which most people use to heat their homes, more than tripled due to a shortage of product and a lack of pipeline(s) to carry the demand.

At the time I was Chairman of the Finance Committee. I had a meeting scheduled for early January on a number of topics. A week before the scheduled meeting, I went to the two local papers (the Raytown Post and the Raytown Tribune)* and gave them a press release announcing the Finance Committee meeting would also include an open forum. The purpose was discuss what to do with a $250,000 windfall the city had gained due to natural gas price increases.
*In those days, the internet was not what is today. Raytown was blessed with two weekly papers that collectively did a very good job of keeping the public informed.

I had previously proposed the city cut the tax on Natural Gas until the weather warmed. I had some support on the Board for this change – but not enough to acquire the six votes to make it happen.

The night of the meeting arrived. The committee was made up of one-half of the Board of Aldermen. Most who were opposed to the rollback of the 8% Natural Gas Franchise Tax.

Eight people showed up to testify. As did Al Brown, the founder or REAP (Raytown Energy
Assistance Program). They told of having to keep their home thermostats set as low as they could so they could afford to heat their homes. Some told how no matter how many clothes or blankets they layered on, the cold still penetrated. Some told how their health had deteriorated due to the constant cold.

A local television station had seen the press releases and has sent a camera crew to film the meeting.

At the end of one and one-half hours of testimony I asked for a motion to provide REAP (Raytown Energy Assistance Program) with $30,000 to help those in need of assistance to pay their heating bills. The motion passed unanimously. (About three weeks later, the Board of Aldermen added another $20,000 to the fund)

After the meeting I was approached by our City Finance Director. He told me he knew I was disappointed in not getting the tax roll back for all of Raytown. But, he continued, “You need to know they (the members of the Finance Committee) came to the meeting with the intention of giving nothing”.

I went home that evening feeling pretty good about what the Finance Committee had recommended.

I watched the news and saw something I rarely see on a local news broadcast. The reporter on the scene told what had happened at the meeting. The two anchor persons then took time to comment to each other how it was such a good and nice gesture for the City of Raytown to do what it did for its people.

What are the top strengths Raytown has and how can those be pursued or maximized?
Every viable community is made strong by the people that live in it. Raytown is no exception. People in Raytown want to be proud of their city. This is their home. They raise their children here. They grow old here. I really believe this. The last four years in Raytown have been rough. There has been animosity and anger. In many ways we are a community divided.

Raytown needs new leadership to change its course to a more productive path.

To do so we need to dial back the noise in our lives and start living again as good neighbors.

What are the top challenges that Raytown has and how may we overcome those?
1. Refinance the TIF Debt of the 350 Highway TIF.
2. Abandon the failed Light Aggregate Seal program on neighborhood streets.
    Replace it with the use of asphalt and concrete for repairs.
3. Make transparency in Raytown city government a reality.

52 comments:

Anonymous said...

I know I reported to the canidatate who I support an angry woman knocked on my door and said it be arrested if I didn't move the sign, I told her to buzz off and closed the door on her face. That was a week ago and I haven't had trouble since.

Anonymous said...

500,000 dollars! Why haven't we heard about this?
I didn't know the city and the fire district got in a lawsuit, when did that happen and why? Why is the mayor hiding all these problems with a smile?

Anonymous said...

Speaking of campaign issues. A candidate for alderman used donations to sponsor her business. Isn't that illegal? I know Clean Missouri only applies to State level, but something tells me using campaign money to increase business is or should be illegal.
What would she do if in office? Would she the use taxpayer money to fund her business like our president does? That's not someone I want in the citt, we have enough problems.

Anonymous said...

Only 1 mayor candidate has said what he will do, the other is relying on his smile. No wonder the mayor's clique has to harass his opponent about signs.

Anonymous said...

Input, please.
With what? One week until the election, what material accomplishments or advancements can be directly attibuted to this incumbent mayor? Other than riding the bench? Serious responses only. TIA.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous 5:03pm -
You say you didn't know about the lawsuit between the city and the fire department. Well, you must be new to the neighborhood. How do we know? Simple, the information and subsequent debate has been all over this blog, as well as two separate Facebook pages. Only someone who is new, or has their head in the sand, wouldn't be aware.

Anonymous said...

Raytown is more divided. The police pension is being funded. Those are good things, right?

Anonymous said...

Beyond this the Fire District held a Town Hall meeting explaining the lawsuit, there were banners at least 8 feet long at both Fire Stations announcing the meeting, at this time Raytown still had two local papers and the Fire District purchased ad space in both announcing. If you didn’t know then you didn’t try.

Anonymous said...

Paul, what are your thoughts on the April 2nd ballot? Mayor? School District? Fire Dostrict? Yes/No and why?

Anonymous said...

I wonder why the city's website does not have any information about the Tuesday night forum being held by the League of Women Voters? The Chamber of Commerce is a co-sponsor. You would think the city would want as many people as possible to attend the meeting.

Maybe it is part of some sort of commitment to TRANSPARENCY at city hall.

Yeah, that has to be it. I am sure the incumbents want as many people as possible at the forum.

Anonymous said...


The Ring MOU and the NAACP MOU have nothing to do with each other.

From the city's website:

R-3189-19: A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AND APPROVING A MEMORANDUM OF
UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY OF RAYTOWN AND RING LLC.

4. R-3190-19: A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AND APPROVING THE EXECUTION OF A
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF RAYTOWN,
MISSOURI AND THE KANSAS CITY BRANCH OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE
ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE.

Anonymous said...

I thought about that too. The city hid who was on the ballot buried 3 links in, then reversed the ballot order on the sample ballot. The incumbent has repeatedly barrassed his opponet and the supporters.
I hope everyone comes, I promise you'll see a large difference in intelligence.

Anonymous said...

Why, in 2019, do so many people still have to make everything about race?

Anonymous said...

I wonder if I am the only one looking forward to April 3rd.

The election will be behind us and with luck several will start acting like adults again.

Anonymous said...

Just as the band played on the Titanic to comfort passengers while she sank, so it is with our dear mayor, smiling as we burn millions in reserves.
The question is, will enough residents be fooled.

Anonymous said...

If I read the reposted story from last year correctly, the city tried to withhold those records too?! Seems to me if the mayor and crew spent less time trying to cover things up we might get more time spent fixing issues.

Anonymous said...

Mike signed off on the NAACP? Must have made his supporters upset. His sign looks like it is at plan headquarters on 350.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1v2ubjV9TwlTQHz5PeWUzMELrukArmf03/view?usp=drivesdk
Any explanation? Did they steal his sign or does he endorse them too?

Anonymous said...

How important is good leadership? Well, six years ago all you heard was that the Fire Department was bankrupt and laying off employees. I remember setting in the audience at a candidate forum back then and listening to 2 current sitting Aldermen take turns attacking the Fire District, they both advocated for the absorption of the District into the City operation. Well fast forward to today and Raytowners refer to our Fire District on social media consistently with such terms as "stellar, outstanding, tremendous and even exceptional. The Fire District is rated as one of the best services in the country and one of only three level 1 rated fire departments in the area which saved us the taxpayer annually more than we pay for them on our taxes. They assumed the dismal ambulance operation that had a revolving door of employees, out of control overtime costs and yet still failed to staff the needed amount of ambulances on a consistent basis. All you have to do is a quick youtube search and you will see Raytown's ambulance was the subject of numerous State investigations over the past 2 years for improper care. Since taking them over the Fire District, has operated both ambulances 24/7. They have hired a highly qualified, educated and experienced person to oversee the operation. Most importantly, as anyone who pays attention can see the Fire District has restored professionalism to the Ambulance operation. I point all of this out not toot the horn of the Fire District (they don't need it), I point it out because you have to look at the only thing that has changed in the past 6 years. The only thing that has changed in that time is their Chief Matt Mace, who by the way is appointed as well. This folks is a textbook case of leadership and what can be accomplished when you have it. In the past 6 years, they have not increased our taxes, in-fact they have lowered them through the refinancing of their Bonds in 2016 returning almost a million dollars in taxes back to us. Yes they are asking for an increase next week, but instead of just saying they need it. They put together a detailed plan that provides an incentive that not only justifies the increase, but actually offers a cost benefit to the senior citizens of Raytown. Now it would be really short sided to credit the Chief with all of these accomplishments, but it is equally short sided to not recognize the only measurable change in this time period was the top spot. So next Tuesday when you are completing your ballot, stop and think about the importance of leadership, think about about what can be accomplished in just a 4 year term with the right choice, and think about which of your choices can be the leader we need at the City Hall.

Anonymous said...

Rules for both canidatates at the forum. Don't try to be too smart.
If the incumbent does he'll make a fool of himself.
If the challenger does, he'll go over time and lose everyone in the depth of his answer.

Anonymous said...

She's at it again.
She who will not be ignored decided to publish her candidate "questionnaires" again.
Mr. Walters answered your "questionaire". Here.
His concise, intelligent, literate answers clearly reflect his extensive history with the city, his business experience and how he can improve our situation.
To quote this FB admin, that "speaks volumes".
WHERE Mr. Walters chose to publish the answers to that question was his prerogative.
You asked. He answered. Period.

Anonymous said...

Looks like Susan is changing the rules on what and when to post to support her choices. She admitted rules aren't really important anyway. Hope she post Greg's now. It's the same copy and paste she has to do for all the others... unless there's another reason.

Anonymous said...

So you think Greg responding to the questionnaire here is enough? He gets, what, maybe 2,000 readers a month? Susie's FB page has more than 14,000 members. Maybe they all don't comment, but a large majority of them read it. They will see all the questionnaires, and they will be aware of the candidates who haven't submitted one. It'll be interesting to see if those who thumb their nose at the people will win or lose.

Anonymous said...

1:22 pm -

Mike's sign is in front of the Specialty Concept Fence company at 10920 E 350 Hwy. The Confederate flag is clearly next door at 11000 E. 350 Hwy. You must be supporting the other candidate is you're willing to tell such a blatant lie.

Anonymous said...

"Hope she post Greg's now. It's the same copy and paste she has to do for all the others... unless there's another reason."

Nah. Doubt she will.

Here's why. It's easy peasy, actually. We suspect that Unglued assembled these "questionaires" partially to initiate additional discussion, negative buzz for the candidates that they despise. You know, the ones that they would do almost anything to "get at".

Greg's answers are so airtight, they realize that they would look even more foolish if they attempted to controvert his answers.

Anonymous said...

A BLOG from the Raytown interim chief of police? Glad to see this. Very appreciated.

https://rpdchief.com/2019/03/25/agency-cooperation-and-major-cases/

Anonymous said...

"It'll be interesting to see if those who thumb their nose at the people will win or lose."

It's doubtful that the candidates are thumbing their noses at "the people".

Instead, it's highly likely that the candidates are thumbing their noses at Suz.

Anonymous said...

Pictures dont lie. And I'd bet in a day or so that sign will be gone.

Anonymous said...

If the sign is not on the exact same property, it does not matter!! You can take a picture at many different angles and try to tell your version of a story. You can also Photoshop pictures very easily. How about we worry about real world problems like needing $35+ million dollars to get roads to average, when no one knows where the money is going to come from! Or storm drains that are collapsing due to age that no one know how to pay for! Those are just the two big ones!

Anonymous said...



What does putting a sign at a business have anything to do with a private residence?

NOTHING!

Anonymous said...

Rumors around town are our city clerk is unable to respond to Sunshine request in a timely manor.

I would recommend those people who are waiting to send a email to the Attorney Generals office and State Auditors office.

We are only going to get the city to follow the letter of the law when we get other agencies involved as our Board of Alderman continue to stand behind the behavior that is unacceptable of a professional.

Keep in mind the city is have the state audit them now and the main stream news has been all over the place about the city clerk and failure to comply to a Sunshine request that cost us taxpayers over $42,000.

Anonymous said...

"It'll be interesting to see if those who thumb their nose at the people will win or lose."

That thing on Facebook doesn't represent us. They definitely don't represent "the people".

If so, we're in huge difficulty. Their level of hatred, divisiveness and intolerance is extraordinary. Sometimes they'll go too far, delete a few items and dial it back a bit, but it doesn't take them long to get back at it.

Any elected official that communicates through that group should be ashamed of themselves. That group is a nuisance.

Anonymous said...

Well only one week to go. I can't wait. But if this is anything like the tax vote, no matter who wins the drama will continue.

Anonymous said...

"Any elected official that communicates through that group should be ashamed of themselves. That group is a nuisance."

Agreed. Our apologies to the National Enquirer, but that Facebook page, while not sophisticated nor bright enough to realize it, unintentionally mirrors their technique. They embed trash in general interest, helpful posts. While they tout "membership", it's obvious by a number of factors that their actual engagement numbers are abysmal.

Not only should any responsible elected official avoid any association with that "group", he City should insist that this "group" prominently and permanently display a disclosure that the "group" is not representative of all citizens nor of the City of Raytown.

Anonymous said...

With all the debate on signs and things lets take a moment to look at what will come before the Board of Alderman and ask ourselves who really will represent the best interest of Raytown.

The Park Board President cannot seem to control his personal need to force an additional tax upon us will the parks department has a reserve of almost 1 million dollars.

Let me say that again a reserve of almost 1 million dollars.

The lies don't stop there as he wants you to believe based on his presentation before the Board of Alderman that with those reserves they cannot even afford to fix the tennis courts or wall around the lake at Kenagy park.

DO NOT BUY IT!

From conversations with several Alderman the money they have will cover these expense if they would just put the money to use.

I therefore recommend you get in WRITING from the candidates in your Ward and Mayoral race where they are on this PARK TAX and vote like it is another attempt to take our hard working tax dollars.

Anonymous said...

Was a Bob Cochran supporter until I heard him last night. I got so tired of hearing the buzz work "newbie". Maybe he should have came to some council meetings to find out how city government works. What really closed the door on voting for him was when he gave Alderman Steve Meyers thanks for mentoring him. Wow that just shows me he is really out of touch with what is going on in the city. My vote is for Mrs. van Buskirk because she went straight to the gossip that is out there about her, and how she would vote with her husband on the board. Nice to see an honest person.

Anonymous said...

Kudos to Tony Jacobs he did a get job last night at the candidate form and handed the mayor his lunch. Think he has a lot of support. Keep working Tony.

Anonymous said...

The school district wants us to approve their spending, but their spending is going to cost us even more than they are being honest about because once you build something you have to take care of it.

It is past time for the ongoing waste of money on fields and sports

It is time to say no and let them come back when they change their ways and improve classroom scores, classroom sizes, and teacher to student ratio.

Anonymous said...

The forum was really great. It is on YouTube everyone should watch it. I think there are a few things to watch for.

From the mayoral candidates:
Who had solutions and who had excuses.
Who acknowledged we had problems and who smiled and said there were none.
Who answered the questions themselves and who only critized their opponent.

From the aldermen:
Who had no idea on any of the issues as the "newbie".
Who didn't even bother to show up.
And all candidates acknowledged the current poor leadership. That was the only thing they agreed on.

Are we better than we were 4 years ago?

Anonymous said...

Well the current mayor put it on the agenda 6 meetings in a row. He wasted so much time that could've gone to more pressing issues.
The parks board threatened to mutany and only stopped so the mayor could keep his clean image that all is well. I would support eliminating the board as most 4th class communities don't have one. Tripling the sales tax is not the answer.

Anonymous said...

I have to agree i felt he had good promise and my kids love him. Then he stated he had lotterally no opinion on anything and would vote however the wind blew that day. I want someone that has the ability to actually care about what's going on and the stones to make a decision without hand holding.
And if Steve is his puppeteer it is a deffinate No as his antics at meetings were discussed in-depth as unprofessional.

Anonymous said...

I was impressed as well, and now understand why his opponent refused to debate him.
Tony gave original thought to every question and answered well. I saw the current mayor just answer for us to trust and believe someone knows best but it didn't have to be him. That was scary.

Also, I noticed Tony helped setup and take down the place, a true servant.

Anonymous said...

The school district operates on the McDonald's model.
Save money by cutting staff. By staff I mean teachers, they add admin staff at outrageous rates of pay, but cut trachers.
I wonder if some of the dwindling numbers are because people are moving to better districts.
Voting no won't save today but will save about 300 a year in a few. The district already has the second highest taxes in the area, time to cut back a little.

Betty Rowland said...

7:10 stated the school district has the second highest taxes in the area. They forgot to say the school district also has the second lowest test scores in the area. Obviously, buying old YMCA buildings and having fancy new football fields DO NOT improve student learning. Vote no on the school bonds. Enough is enough.

Anonymous said...

"My vote is for Mrs. van Buskirk... Nice to see an honest person."

We overwhelmingly agree! Additionally, Mrs. VanBuskirk has an incredible energy level. She hasn't even been elected yet and has been a tremendous source of assistance. We really enjoyed our interaction with her.

Anonymous said...

I got two fliers in the mail today, one for each of the candidates for mayor.

On mikes he had a list of names and I thought they were endorsements. I know a few of them, called, and found out they DO NOT endorse him. They did not give permission to use their names, although they have worked with him in the past. That's very dishonest.

Tonys stated we were under investigation by quiet a few agencies, and I didn't believe it, but just like with the other I called. It's true. WHAT IS GOING ON?! I've never seen some place have so many investigations and almost all started before the election.

I am not voting for Mike, he's gottan us in so much trouble.
I'm voting for Tony, has honest about what state were in and isn't trying to cover everything up with a smile .

Paul Livius said...

To view the video of the Raytown Forum hosted by the Raytown Chamber of Commerce and the League of Women Voters go to the top of this week's Raytown Report.

Anonymous said...

Otis Taylor III also dropped out of the race early on.

Anonymous said...

Just got the mailers today of the two mayor's.
One was just about how nice he was and had no solutions. The other identified problems and had real solutions. That's who I'm voting for.

Anonymous said...

I can't wait for the election to be over with. I just got hounded for not having a button for the mayor. Not by him but by some mutual friends. I don't care to have a button, I think they're cheap and dumb.
But if that's the kind of people in his camp it makes me question supporting him. All I see from his people is uncontrolled hate for anyone who dares disagree. My mom always said if you want to know someone look at their friends.

Anonymous said...

Our Mayor and several Alderman have been very upset with fellow citizens who have been critical over saying the police chief Jim Lynch retired instead of he resigned.


Upon looking into this going back as far as President Nixon's Administration all the searches clearly show he resigned as president

Looking to local politicians we see former Sheriff Mike Sharp resigned as Sheriff

The fact is mr. Lynch did not complete his term in office which means he resigned from that office had he truly retired from that office he then would have completed his term and decided not to run for the next one

Why is this important if our mayor and alderman can't get this right do you expect them to get anything else right

Anonymous said...

"Kudos to Tony Jacobs he did a get job last night at the candidate form and handed the mayor his lunch. Think he has a lot of support. Keep working Tony."

Watch the video.
Compare and contrast the mayoral candidates.
Thematic, analytical and critical thinking.
Mr. Jacobs was the clear winner.
It's quite obvious why the incumbent did whatever he could to avoid a debate with Jacob.
Four more weary years of that incumbent mayor?
Four more years of a city in decline?
We need change. Now.

Anonymous said...

"Four more weary years of that incumbent mayor?"

That's what it comes down to.

4 more years of decline, embarrassment, negative perception and negative TV coverage?

We're willing to give Tony Jacob a chance.

Is Jacob perfect? Definitely not. Will be make mistakes? Absolutely.

But we're certain that he will be an enormous upgrade.

Let's work to reclaim our pride and to fix our city.