Sunday, March 11, 2018

RAYTOWN'S LEADING NEWS SOURCE

To leave a comment use this link POST A COMMENT


THE RICE-TREMONTI HOME
Spring Soup and Crafts
Historic 1844 Rice-Tremonti Home
8801 E. 66th Street    Raytown, MO
March 17 and 18    11:00-4:00pm
Be sure to mark your calendar for the annual Soup and Craft event. Homemade Soup, corn bread, pie and a beverage for $7.  
All proceeds go towards the upkeep of this Historic Home.


BY GREG WALTERS
BOA Considers Changing Public Comment Rules
In a surprise move, some members of the Raytown Board of Aldermen brought forth a discussion on changing the rules governing the Public Comments portion of its regular meetings.

Ward 4 Alderman Steve Meyers opened the discussion with remarks at the end of last Tuesday City Council Meeting.

BACKGROUND The practice of setting aside time at the beginning of regularly scheduled meetings of the Board or Aldermen began in 2004. Any Raytown citizen who wished could address the Board on any subject provided it had to do with city business. Originally the time set aside for speakers was set at three minutes. It has since been expanded to five minutes per individual. A person speaking on behalf of a group is allowed ten minutes to speak.

The Mayor is charged with the responsibility of making certain the rules regarding Public Comments be followed. He regularly reminds the audience at the beginning of Public Comments that personal attacks will not be tolerated, and that speakers must remain on city topics. He has come under criticism for ignoring those rules, particularly when speakers stray into the areas outside of city business.

RECENT EVENTS Public speakers are supposed to be limited to one opportunity per meeting. Meyers said, “we all know that has been abused”, in reference to comments made by one speaker from Lee’s Summit who made repeated trips to the podium. The speaker was a representative of the Fraternal Order of Police (FOP).

In another incident, the Mayor directed the City Clerk to read into the record a statement written by Independence resident Susan Vorbeck Brown. Ms. Brown manages several Facebook pages including Raytown Unleashed.

OTHER ALDERMEN SPEAK OUT Alderman Jason Greene echoed some of the points made by Meyers. Greene questioned the need for individuals to give their name and address at the beginning of their comments. One frequent speaker at City Council meetings had complained that by giving his address he was running the risk of people robbing his home when they knew he was at City Hall speaking.

Alderman Jim Aziere said he wanted to know who was speaking. He especially was wanted to know in which Ward they lived so that he could address their concerns properly.

Ward 4 Alderman Bill VanBuskirk said there had only been a couple of instances in which speakers were opposed to giving their name and address. He also said, to his knowledge, there have not been any crimes committed as a result of someone addressing the Board of Alderman.
Paul’s Rant! BY PAUL LIVIUS 
Ward 4 Alderman Steve Meyers may very well have opened a can of worms at the last City Council meeting. Truthfully, it is a can of worms that needs to be opened. The subject here is Public Comments.

Sometimes a good idea can go sour if it is not managed correctly. Such is the case with Public Comments. Held twice monthly at the beginning of meetings, local political gadflies, have found a way to unfairly attack their representatives at the start of the meeting. They have proven to be adept at manipulating the local television news media to cover their comments.

After the smoke has cleared, the television stations pack up their cameras and leave.

At the last City Council meeting six of this group were in attendance. Three of them were on the local news protesting who knows what outside city hall. It must have been a slow news night – all of the metropolitan area got to see the three protestors smeared across their television screens.

Three of the same group got up to speak during Public Comments. Are six political activists a true representation of the 30+ thousand other souls living in Raytown?

To their credit, City Council members have done well in holding their tongue when the accusations and attacks start to fly.

Public Comments is a good tool of communication. It can help to solve problems. It can keep other topics from developing into larger problems.

But it must be managed.

When the same individuals begin to dominate the process, it can quickly turn into a circus. The City Council seems to be aware there is a problem. Hopefully, it is the first step in correcting a good idea gone bad.

The Paul Livius Report 
BY PAUL LIVIUS
Mayor McDonough issued a proclamation to Raytown High School students who form “Lead 2 Feed”.  This organization collect food and funds for REAP.

Eric Teeman said he has an issue with the way the Board did not appoint the vacant seat in Ward 5.  Kathie Schutte said she is disappointed with the Board not filling the empty seat in Ward 5.  Michael Anderson said he is circulating a petition directing the Board of Aldermen to appoint Melissa Beall.  Phyllis Goforth said this will be the 8th year of the Egg-Extravaganza.  It will start with a parade at 11:00 on March 31 at the Raytown Christian Church.  She said they still need volunteers to help with the egg hunt. Melissa Beall told the Board she never considered withdrawing.  Last week, the mayor warned her that the vote might not pass, but she chose to stay.

The Board tabled an ordinance vacating a portion of 75th Street located between the East right-of-way line of Raytown Road and the West property line.   Mitch DiCarlo, on behalf of Raytown Wash LLC, is requesting approval of a right-of-way be vacated. The applicant is requesting to vacate right-of-way on 75th Street between Raytown Road and westbound MO-350 Highway. The request to vacate 75th Street is a condition placed on the Conditional Use Permit for the future Tidal Wave Car Wash located to the north of the existing right-of-way. The right-of-way to be vacated is approximately 232 feet long and 45 feet wide. Written consent to vacate has been received by 2/3 of adjacent property owners. Notices for Consent to Vacate have been provided by the following adjacent property owners: FJM Distributing Company LP, Raytown Wash LLC, and Raytown Auto Developers LLC. Kansas City Power and Light (KCP&L), KC Water, Public Water Supply District #2, AT&T, and Spire (formerly MGE) have all waived objections subject to retaining their utility easements and protection of existing facilities.

The Board passed an ordinance granting an amendment to a planned development to allow for an assisted living facility on lot 5 of Blue Ridge Villas in accordance with the provisions of the comprehensive zoning regulations for Raytown.  Ivan Chiang, LIY Financial, is requesting approval of an amendment to the Blue Ridge Villas planned development and a site plan for an assisted living facility on Lot 5. The planned development, located at 59th St. and Hunter Court, was approved in January 2006. To date, approximately eighty percent of the lots remain vacant. The applicant is requesting to make an assisted living facility an allowed use on Lot 5. The building would have almost the same building footprint as the five patio homes intended for this lot. The site plan indicates additional parking to account for the increased demand as well as several site furnishings for the common areas. The assisted living facility will adhere to the requirements of the Design Manual for Blue Ridge Villas to keep a consistent design aesthetic for the neighborhood.

The Board passed an ordinance authorizing an intergovernmental agreement for environmental services with Jackson County.   The City has been using the services of Jackson County to provide food service inspections for the various business/concerns located in Raytown that serve/sell food products. Given that Jackson County has the expertise and equipment to conduct such inspections, this relationship has worked out well for the City. Jackson County provides reports on all inspections and those results are incorporated into the appropriate records of the business/concern. Additionally, the inspection results can be viewed on the Jackson County web site (www.jacksongov.org/fsi). There is no cost to the City for the inspection service.

The Board passed an ordinance authorizing an interlocal agreement with the Missouri cities of Blue Springs, Buckner, Grain Valley, Grandview, Greenwood, Independence, Lake Lotawana, Lake Tapawingo, Lee’s Summit, Lone Jack, Oak Grove and Sugar Creek, as well as the State Highway Patrol and Jackson County, including the Jackson County Sherriff’s office and the Jackson County Drug Task Force for law enforcement services. The Jackson County Drug Task Force is a multi-jurisdictional enforcement group pursuant to a cooperative Memorandum of Understanding between many participating Law Enforcement entities, including Raytown. The current MOU went into effect in 1998 and the new MOU will commence on April 1, 2018 and will continue as long as the COMBAT, Community Backed Anti-Crime Tax, is in effect. The changes from the existing MOU and the updated MOU reflect the current operating procedures of the Jackson County Task Force in which Chief Jim Lynch serves on the Board of Directors.

The Board passed an ordinance approving the second amendment to the second amended and restated tax increment financing redevelopment agreement Raytown, Missouri and Raytown 350 INV Group LLC On December 7, 2010, the Board of Alderman executed the First Amendment to the Second Amended and Restated Tax Increment Financing Redevelopment Agreement. Project 2 Deferred Improvements within Section b (2) (A) and (B) of this agreement required the Developer, Raytown 350 INV Group (Block and Company), to construct a series of public improvements along Raytown Road and eastbound Highway 350 per Missouri Department of Transportation and City of Raytown’s design standards. Since the execution of the First Amendment to the Second Amended and Restated Tax Increment Financing Redevelopment Agreement, Missouri Department of Transportation and the City of Raytown have determined the public improvements identified in Section b (2) (B) of the Agreement are no longer required to be constructed along eastbound Highway 350. The Second Amendment to the Second Amended and Restated eliminates the requirement of the Developer to construct a “proposed future entrance”, “future curb”, and the “future shared access” along eastbound Highway 350. Missouri Department of Transportation and the City of Raytown are still requiring to be constructed a “Proposed 10’ Wide Bike & Pedestrian Path” along eastbound Highway 350 and a “5’ sidewalk” along Raytown Road in front of IHOP. The Second Amendment provides for the Developer to, in lieu of construction, pay the City of Raytown’s Public Works Department to cause the construction of a “Proposed 10’ Wide Bike & Pedestrian Path” along eastbound Highway 350 and a “5’ sidewalk” along Raytown Road in front of IHOP. City Staff and legal counsel have aggressively negotiated with the developer on the terms of the proposed amended and restated development agreement.

The Board passed an ordinance approving the final plat of Lourdes subdivision.  Sam DePriest, Continental Consulting Engineers Inc., is requesting approval of a final plat for the Lourdes Subdivision. Mr. DePriest is working on behalf of the Our Lady of Lourdes Catholic Church and the Raytown C-2 School District to plat the church’s property. As the old parochial school is now being used by the Raytown C-2 School District, both parties would like to redraw property lines to place the school on a separate lot. Additionally, Our Lady of Lourdes Church decided to separate the remaining buildings into separate lots that aligned with their individual uses. The proposed subdivision has four lots. The church, sisters’ home, rectory and public pre-school will all be on separate lots. Utility services are already established, and no public improvements will be necessary. Utility easements will be dedicated with this final plat. The public school and the church will share existing drives and will have joint ingress and egress for vehicular and pedestrian access over all of the existing parking lots and walkways.


The Board approved a resolution declaring certain property owned by Raytown as surplus and authorizing disposition of such property by auction Multiple vehicles have been taken out of service due to the purchase and operation of new vehicles. Public Works has evaluated the vehicles that were taken out of service and it was determined that these vehicles are not well-suited for continued use by the City and should therefore be deemed surplus and disposed of in accordance with the purchasing policy.
The information for the vehicles is as follows:

Unit 105 = 2014 Ford Explorer PIU, 1FM5K8AR9EGC08240, miles 86,785

Unit 106 = 2014 Ford Explorer PIU, 1FM5K8AR0EGC08241, miles 105,982

Unit 119 = 2009 Chevy Impala, 2G1WB57K291310198, miles 97,185

Unit 122 = 2010 Chevy Impala, 2G1WA5EK6A1220403, miles 92,376

Unit 126 = 2008 Chevy Impala, 2G1WB58K481343202, miles 85,559

Unit 131 = 2005 Ford Crown Victoria, 2FAHP71W75X171949, miles 86,376

Unit 133 = 2011 Harley Davidson, 1HD1FMM15BB644922, miles 11,674 Unit 134 = 2011 Harley Davidson, 1HD1FMM10BB644679, miles 27,835.

 The vehicles listed above would be sold in accordance with the purchasing policy. Proceeds from the sale of Units 105, 106, 119, 122, 126, 131, 133 & 134 would be deposited back to the appropriate fund. 

The Board approved a resolution approving the additional expenditure of funds relating to a professional services agreement with Olsson Associates for design and construction services of the 83rd Street bridge in an amount not to exceed $165,485.65.  The 83rd Street Bridge construction project is scheduled to begin construction in March of 2018.  This is a complex construction project that will require a significant amount of labor intensive oversight. It is estimated that adequate inspection of this project will require approximately 8-9 hours per day through the duration of the aggressive 180-day construction schedule.

 As per Resolution R-2895-16, the original agreement with Olsson was executed on August 9, 2016 for $408,071.96.  A purchase order is needed for the amount remaining for the remainder of the signed agreement as per the schedule of reimbursable fees attached.  The design service part of this agreement has already been completed for $257,630.46 and paid to date.

 Staff needs to open a purchase order for the Olsson Associates construction services portion of the agreement for $150,441.50.  These services will include project management, review of bridge shop drawings and material submittals, oversight of all construction activities, utility coordination, the upkeep of all required daily inspection notes and forms, communications with City staff and surrounding property owners, progress meetings, coordination of all required testing, and the completion of final documents. 

The Board passed a resolution authorizing the expenditure of additional funds through change order no. 1 with GBA related to the 59th Street sidewalk project in an amount not to exceed $19,688 for a total amount not to exceed $82,087.  The 59th Street Sidewalk Project started construction at the end of October of 2017. This is a complex construction project that requires a significant amount of labor intensive oversight. Adequate inspection of this project requires from 6 to 9 hours per day through the duration of the construction schedule.

GBA inspection services includes the oversight of all construction activities, utility coordination, the upkeep of all required daily inspection notes and forms, communications with City staff and surrounding property owners, bi-weekly progress meetings, coordination of all required testing, and the completion of as-builts.  The initial proposal was for $59,428.00.  The BOA approved a not to exceed amount of $62,399.40 on August 15, 2017.  This change order amount of $19,688.00 will make the project total not to exceed amount $82,087.  The 59th Street Sidewalk Project has taken a little longer than expected and has required more hours of oversight by the GBA inspectors.  This additional amount will safely get us through the end of the project and to close it out.

The Board of Aldermen had three discussion items.  The first was a report by the Mayor relating to the “Raytown Live” committee.  The Mayor said the second Saturday of each month, from May through September, there will be family-friendly music venues at the green space.  These events will be fully funded by donations.

The second discussion item was for rental regulations.  Alderman Ryan Myers said there are approximately 14,000 total housing units in Raytown.  There are 10,200 owner occupied units and 3,800 renter occupied units (houses, apartment complexes, and duplexes).  Rental regulations will improve safety, cleanliness of our neighborhoods, the property values, and community development and code enforcement.

Safety would be improved because the majority of crime is in rental property.  Code violation remediation will mean safer dwelling.

The landlords who live outside Jackson County must register with a local property manager, who will fill out all the paperwork.  Liens will be placed on property due to non-compliance.  Exterior inspections will no longer be limited to street view, but to the backyards as well.

Alderman Myers said the codes department is understaffed and has difficulty keeping with the code violations.  A portion of the registration fee will help fund additional inspectors.  With 3,800 rental units and a registration fee of $75, that will bring in $285,000 to help fund this project.

Alderman Steve Meyers said he has heard from many residents about folks who speak during public comments having to give their address.  He believes putting their address on the sign-up sheet should be sufficient.  He would like some the rules enforced more, such as the rule indicating each speaker only gets one trip to the podium.  We saw how that was abused last fall.  Raytown limits the public comment portion to 30 minutes.  He thinks that also should be enforced.  Some meetings, there will be 20 speakers all saying the same thing.  Alderman Jason Greene said speakers must make their comments in person.  Emailing their thoughts and having the city clerk read them into the record should not be allowed. Alderman Jim Aziere said he wants to know that the speaker lives in Raytown, He thinks it is very important.  Alderman Bill Van Buskirk said people have been coming to these meetings a long time, and to his knowledge, there have not been any adverse incidents because someone was ere and gave their address.

To leave a comment use this link POST A COMMENT

53 comments:

Anonymous said...

No one has been turned away from public comments as far as I know, so saying the same people dominate the comments is silly. Honestly, it'd be great to see more people taking part in the process of city goverement. The protestors out front, had you attended or truly seen them on the news, you'd know it was because the seat in Ward 5 is vacant. Yes, seats have been vacant for awhile before, and maybe that's part of the reason the city is in a financial mess? To address the address situation, pretty sure no one would have an issue with saying what ward or city they're from, or their connection to the city and why the feel they should be allowed to address the board, no reason in this day and age to make addresses so readily available to people who might be live streaming or watching from home.

Anonymous said...

"He also said, to his knowledge, there have not been any crimes committed as a result of someone addressing the Board of Alderman."

I think, however, this is on people's minds. If the no-address rule passes, I expect to see many more folks address the aldermen.

If you have someone already at home that can call for help as soon as something bad is happening, you are lucky.

Many of us live by ourselves and as such we think about safety differently. The person may not break in, but what if they are lying in wait for you to get home? Yes you can say it has not happened yet, but why wait for something bad to happen to make a change?

I am in favor of speakers not giving their addresses in public comments.

Anonymous said...

I wonder if Steve Meyers is going to check with other communities to see if they require a speaker give his name and home address when they address the city council in Lee's Summit, Independence and Kansas City. Let me save you some time. I already did. They all require name and address. I think the some ones who were spreading the lie that criminals would hack into the police department to ambush police officers if gps was added to police cars.

You guys should form a club. How about naming it Paranoids are Us. I think we can get some tin hats for all of you to wear when you meet.

What's next? Take down the name tags of elected and appointed officials so the criminals will not assassinate them when they go home after the meeting?

You guys are unbelievable!

Anonymous said...

Might want to check your facts. LSMO does not require you to give address over the air.

Jorge

Anonymous said...

@6:53

This is Raytown, not Lee's Summit, Independence or KC. If those cities still require people to state their name and address publicly to the audience and anyone live streaming, that's their choice. How can you be sure they aren't looking at changes to their policies? Personal Identifying Information security is a thing, especially with data and such. Maybe Raytown will take lead in only requiring people to give their ward or, if not from Raytown, their city and why they feel their business is city related. If you think it's paranoid to not park your car in dark spots of parking lots, or not give your name and address to a bunch of strangers that don't need it, or be female and not walk down dark alleys at night, you might want to look at the things happening in this country, state, metro area and even this city- why wait till something happens?

Anonymous said...


6:53pm

"Paranoid" is not a correct description.

Proactive and cautious yes.

Do you lock up your house even when you are at home? I bet you do.
Is it OK for strangers to be roaming the halls of your kid's school? Nope you say.

We do things differently now because the world we live in demands it.

I don't care what other cities do. Raytown does not have to follow them.


Anonymous said...


6:53

The only reason you give to keep addresses at the public comments is because other cities require it?

That's not a good enough reason.

Please---let's stop the juvenile name calling and be adults here.

Peter Weber said...

I want the speakers at the BOA meetings to give their addresses. We have a right to know if the speaker is a Raytown resident or not. We also have the right to know if they are a non-resident that has a business in Raytown. Non-residents have the right to speak, but it carries less weight than a resident or business owner.

Anonymous said...

Why not say your ward and leave your address on the sign in sheet.

Anonymous said...

Do they have security cameras at city hall? If those cameras are hooked to computers they can be hacked. Not sure it there is any place safe enough anymore.

Anonymous said...

After watching the Council meeting it appears the board is going to consider different options as far as the public comments. I agree it needs to be updated. And Lee’s Summit doesn’t require address to be given and according to Alderman Meyers research only gives a total of 10 minutes for entire segment. I thought his approach and that of Alderman Green seemed reasonable and still very respectful for those citizens giving comments.

Andy Whiteman said...

When I address the Raytown BOA, I stated my address as PO Box 18095 since that is the address where I received my tax bills. Since there are many sick, hateful, and violent people out there, I did not feel comfortable stating my residence address publicly. When asked for my street address, I stated that for security reasons, I did not feel comfortable making my address public. I was asked to provide my address to the City Clerk which I did and the issue did not come up again.

It may be impossible to correlate crime with BOA comments. I reported numerous incidents of vandalism to the RPD. I am unable to state why the vandalism occurred. True addresses may be obtained from public tax records etc., but it takes some work to obtain addresses from public records and the average criminal is either too lazy or too stupid to obtain it this way. I feel it is best not to state an address verbally at a BOA meeting making it fair game for sickos.

Andy Whiteman

Anonymous said...

Nice job on the rental property presentation Ryan. Raytown desperately needs this. I saw that there may be some legal hurdles to jump, but it looks like Alderman Myers did his homework and this will hopefully come to fruition.

Anonymous said...

Just because it hasn’t happened, that you know of, doesn’t mean it hasn’t and doesn’t mean it can’t. Are you going to pay for any damages, loss of property or liability for the city if someone gets hurt or worse?

Anonymous said...

In the last week we have had a three alarm apartment fire in a complex that I am told by public safety workers that should be razed and a home invasion where the homeowner fired his weapon and hit the intruder. Here you guys are still arguing about names and vacant seats and how bad the mayor is. I would say clueless describes most of it.

Dean

Anonymous said...

When I pick up my clean up coupons at City Hall, I show them a utility bill with my name and address in addition to my driver's license.
Why not have someone checking in the public commenters and use this as a proof of residency.
I have commented at the meetings before and did not appreciate having to give my information out.
After showing proof of residency, the speaker should only have to give their name.
I understand that many city employees do not reside here but they should also be entitled to speak.
Just please not that gas bag from the FOP.



Anonymous said...

Can someone explain why some people are all upset about the ward 5 nominee not being approved. This is politics people. It is how the decision is made. Even the Mayor now admits he knew he did not have the support to get Bealle appointed. So why forc a vote he knew was going to fail?

I remember two years ago when the Mayor allowed two terms to go unfilled for over four months. Former Ward 5 Alderman Steve Mock passed away in July 2016. His seat was not filled until the election nearly nine months later in April. Josh Greene resigned his Ward 1 seat in November 2016. His seat was left vacant until April 2017 as well.

Nobody complained. No one held a protest march. No one ranted on and on about not having representation in Ward 5 or Ward 1.

What was the difference? Could it be a handful of people, working in collusion with the Mayor are purposely trying to cause turmoil at City Hall. There are plenty of problems that need to faced. Instead of facing those problems head on they spend valuable time arguing about a nomination everyone knew was going to fail (even Bealle admitted as much!) and now, the all important question(s) being probed over Public Comments.

I would much rather they spent as much energy on getting the street in front of my house paved properly.

Anonymous said...

7:30

Never acceptable to not have equal representation. You can come up with whatever justifications your mind can devise but that’s an undefendable position.

Anonymous said...

2:35 PM

That shooting happened close to me. I am waiting for charges to be filed to get the details about what happened. I am concerned about that and other crime in Raytown. I am also concerned about dilapidated apartment buildings.

However, the blog topic this week is public comment names which is why we are commenting on that.

Perhaps the topics of public comment addresses and crime aren't so far removed from each other.

Anonymous said...

7:30 3/12

You are correct with one exception. Steve Mock's seat was not filed for almost 10 months.

It only got filed thanks to an election as the mayor refused to ever bring a name forward.

Anonymous said...

Andy,

Since the passage of the Patriot Act I don't believe anyone should be using a PO Box and those that try clearly have something to hide.

Raytown Newbie said...

Hello 7:30

Nice post. As I recall, what you have said is spot on. Yes, there seem to be many smokescreen non-issues to deflect from the reality of Raytown and its citizen's concerns.

Anonymous said...

I have yet to hear any acceptable reason why the nominee for ward 5 was voted down. I, and others would like an answer. That answer better make sense, and not just political BS either.

Dave Williams said...

Steve Mock's seat sat empty for nine or ten months. Where were all you people that are upset now? Why were you willing to only have one person represent you back then? I can understand if someone just moved to town and now want to be involved. The majority of you claim to have been here all your lives. Where have you been? How come you just now started taking an interest? The city had had financial problems for years. How come you just now started picking the budget apart bit by bit? I think you are all a bunch of hypocrites looking for your 15 minutes.

Anonymous said...

@ 5:39

Bullets are flying. In light of this fact, everything you just said is not important. Be part of the solution. Enough of the tearing down.

Anonymous said...

Not so sure I buy that last comment. It sounds to me like someone has figured out your game plan. All the hypocrisy is exposed and the target knows it has been hit hard and will do anything to change the narrative. They are right about one thing. Time to put down guns shooting those bullets and work for practical solutions to Raytown's problems. Will this mean an end to the constant sniping from the peanut gallery? Probably not, but there is always hope.

Anonymous said...

6:57

Everything that I am advocating for begins and ends with crime and lack of city services. The lack of urgency, blame games, fingering pointing does not change the fact that at the end of the day, the City will either be turned around or it won’t. I am not so sure that it will.

Anonymous said...

To those complaining about shots fired in Raytown and the focus being on the Alderman seat that has not been vacant as long as Mock's.

Have you thought it could be a planed distraction by the city marshal and mayor to not let us know about the crime in Raytown they invited when they made fools of themselves on the news.

You do know that one of the biggest speakers in public comments in part of the police VIP program and a long time friend of both the city marshal and mayor.

Anonymous said...

The process for appoint someone to fill the ward 5 open set was completed for the first person who was brought before the board

Being that person was not approved by the board the mayor needs to restart the process and bring forward another name.

See how simple the process it is and as most of us have grown up and know you don't always get what you want.

Just the facts of life.

Anonymous said...

So if you or the board have someone since it’s so simple, call the mayor and give him a name!
Remember it needs to be someone that’s qualified and can put up with some of the board members

Anonymous said...

Maybe the WARD 5 lady can explain the following:

Why should she be on the board when she clearly doesn't believe she should vote in city elections?

Why should she be on the board when the laws says you have to have taxes paid, but keeping her taxes paid on time is an issue?

What has she done for Raytown?

NO we don't need her our individuals like her representing Raytown.

Anonymous said...

It’s impossible for the police to “hide crime” when the police put out a press release about the shooting. See how that works??

Anonymous said...

@10:50

If these are the embarrassing reasons for voting NO, then the Alderman should of stated this. Perhaps her job got in the way of voting? Hmmm, I dunno. Putting food on the table is kinda a big deal....... Not everyone has a job that allows time off for voting. Being late on taxes sometimes happens to people. It’s tough out there and people are struggling financially. I am still waiting to hear an embarrassing reason....

Anonymous said...

12:16 If you really don't believe police "hide crime" you have never been part of the police family.

Anonymous said...

I am sure this will set a lot of you on fire. But I truly believe the only way to get this city on the right track is to put the police and parks under the city. Do away with the position of mayor because he is just a figure head that cuts ribbons, he doesn't have any power (all thought he thinks he runs the city) We have a very capable city administrator that does a fantastic job of running the city. That alone would save the city over twelve thousand plus dollars a year. Do away with the the city collector another twelve hundred a year We need to get with the program and make Raytown great a place where families want to move to and raise their families.

Anonymous said...

I am so upset to hear the finance director Briana Burrichter is leaving it will be hard to find someone of her knowledge to fill this position. Who in their right mind would want to come work in this quagmire where the mayor throws the city employees under the bus to protect the police department. I wish it were the mayor leaving instead of Briana. Who ever gets her is getting one smart cookie and a super employee.

Anonymous said...

I would like to know if I am correct that one of the people making up things at city hall is also someone that the camber removed from running the day to day business activities as they couldn't do the job?

Anonymous said...

Mayor and chief I have to tell you that the finance director leaving is on the two of you. I can hardly wait to hear the mayors state of the city address full of crap I'm sure. He is the worst mayor we have had in a long time. And of course the chief is just another Marion Beeler nothing to be proud of.

Anonymous said...

How do you figure her resigning is the chief or the mayors fault? That’s the most asinine statement I’ve heard. Get over yourself. Don’t like it, move.

Phil Jacoby said...

I'm amazed by the number of people who profess to know how a fourth-class city works but then make a statement like "only way to get this city on the right track is to put the police and parks under the city". In a fourth-class city, the parks department is a stand-alone entity. It is not supposed to report to anyone but the taxpayers. Thanks to David Bower, there is now a memorandum of understanding that takes away some of the autonomy the park board should have. If you don’t like it you should have voted for the charter when you had the chance.

Anonymous said...

We have heard this crap for a long time. No one would come to work for Raytown because of this or that. Well overall the city has hired some well qualified people and so not well qualified people but they have now hired some great talented folks overall. Just because one person leaves who was a Mahesh hire doesn’t mean the city will fall apart. Tom Cole will find someone from what I have seen watching city hall the last few years. Go Tom Cole !!

Anonymous said...

The last charter was crap. You had two police men on there whose main purpose was to protect the pd. Write a good charter and I'll vote for it.

Anonymous said...

If Tom Cole is so great why is Doug still at EMS or Ray still at codes?

Anonymous said...

The mayors state of the city address was just what I figured it would be, full of crap. He tried to tell us what the job of a mayor is and what the job a policeman is. Mr. Mayor we all know it's YOU who doesn't know, or understand. You threw the alderman under the bus and now one on the board has any respect for you. OMG do the city a favor don't run for another term.

Anonymous said...

The mayors state of the city address was just what I figured it would be, full of nonsense. He tried to tell us what the job of a mayor is and what the job a policeman is. Mr. Mayor we all know it is YOU who does not know, or understand. You threw the alderman under the bus and now one on the board has any respect for you. OMG do the city a favor do not run for another term.

Anonymous said...

We have heard this stuff for a long time. No one would come to work for Raytown because of this or that. Well overall the city has hired some well qualified people and so not well qualified people but they have now hired some great talented folks overall. Just because one person leaves who was a Mahesh hire doesn’t mean the city will fall apart. Tom Cole will find someone from what I have seen watching city hall the last few years. Go Tom Cole !!

Anonymous said...


The last charter was weak. You had two police men on there whose main purpose was to protect the pd. Write a good charter and I will vote for it.

Just an idea, how about a story about the lack of building/housing code enforcement in Raytown? Also the effect neglected rental property/apartment buildings are having on the city. Thank You Alderman Meyers for bringing attention to this important topic.


Anonymous said...

Can someone tell me why Raytown, a city of just under 30,000 people, is slotted for 10 alderman and Lee’s Summit, a city of around 100,000 has 8 council members? Sounds like small town politics to me.

Anonymous said...

Were you at the same address I was at?
Mayor gave kudos to board, staff, citizens, everyone who has been involved in the city. His point was that he took oaths to protect the city and serve all in both capacities as policeman and mayor. Made sense to me. Sorry you’re so closed minded. Hope he does run again. Most involved mayor we have had in a long time.

Anonymous said...

So Alderman Mimms sits with her back to the Mayor during his Chamber speech today as well as being on her phone most of the time. Yea pretty much everyone noticed the obvious disrespect shown. Why even attend?

Anonymous said...


9:57 pm

Like they say in the military--you should respect the office (position) if not the man.

Wow--I am glad she is not my alderman.

Michael said...

Thanks to Alderman Myers for initiating a conversation about rental properties in the city. I strongly support analyzing any regulations that could improve code violation issues at rental properties.

On the surface, code violation concerns appear superficial at best or elitist at worst. We have to recognize some facts, however. The first one is that realtors and their clients are turned off when they come to view homes in neighborhoods with blight. I imagine there are few people in the city who want to see their property values diminished at the cost of neighbors parking cars on the lawn. In the case of my neighborhood, the blight issues aren't entirely confined to rental properties, but they are hugely over represented.

Michael said...

Anonymous 9:57

In college, I took a trip to the Kansas State Capitol. I was shocked to see state senators in session walking around, chatting with each other, and playing on their phones. Since then, I've observed this behavior in a number of highly official and professional settings.

I agree that it looks odd, but if the output of one's work is robust, I see little reason to micromanage how they spend their time in meetings.